this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2025
163 points (99.4% liked)

Not The Onion

15788 readers
1702 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Nate said its app’s users could buy from any e-commerce site with a single click, thanks to AI. In reality, however, Nate relied heavily on hundreds of human contractors in a call center in the Philippines to manually complete those purchases, the DOJ’s Southern District of New York alleges.

Saniger raised millions in venture funding by claiming that Nate was able to transact online “without human intervention,” except for edge cases where the AI failed to complete a transaction. But despite Nate acquiring some AI technology and hiring data scientists, its app’s actual automation rate was effectively 0%, the DOJ claims.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sqw@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 3 hours ago

Another slave-powered "mechanical turk".

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Nasan@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 day ago

Asian Islanders in this case.

[–] The_Caretaker@lemm.ee 22 points 1 day ago

It's still AI. You have to read the fine print. Asian Intelligence.

[–] GreenSofaBed@feddit.is 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Isn't that the same as Amazon with their "automated" grocery stores? But guess it's fine when they do it

[–] undeffeined@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago

Or Tesla and their "AI" robots

[–] Tiger@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Isn’t this super weird, someone is in trouble for employing a lot of people instead of replacing them with tech, nutty.

[–] whatwhatwhatwhat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Idk man, I’m just happy this fake “AI” crap has consequences.

My boss (a C-level) was just telling me about how “AI agents” are so amazing and we should build one to replace our procurement department. Things like this (where they claim “AI” but it’s really humans offshores) make him think AI is a lot more capable than it really is, and this makes it harder for me to keep him from imploding all of our jobs.

[–] Tiger@sh.itjust.works 4 points 22 hours ago

Yeah I agree with that, faked AI helping sell more AI is definitely bad. It’s just ironic this thing, can’t put my finger on it. Like he could have sold a mash up of AI and human involvement and still have had a good selling angle. (I do that at my company, I include the human element as a positive feature, because I think people should be skeptical of AI just let loose on its own.)

[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago
[–] yagurlreese@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

this government has done far worse shit why do they even give a fuck

I'm really surprised this hasn't been discovered more often, but maybe it's just early and more cards will start to fall soon.