I've always had a soft spot for The Exorcist.
this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2025
44 points (95.8% liked)
Casual Conversation
3089 readers
176 users here now
Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.
RULES (updated 01/22/25)
- Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
- Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
- Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
- Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
- No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
- Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.
Casual conversation communities:
Related discussion-focused communities
- !actual_discussion@lemmy.ca
- !askmenover30@lemm.ee
- !dads@feddit.uk
- !letstalkaboutgames@feddit.uk
- !movies@lemm.ee
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The Serpent and the Rainbow. It's been 20 years since I've seen it so I don't know if it holds up.
I did a super scientific study once where I monitored my heart rate while watching movies that were listed as being the scariest. The highest my heart rate went was during a scene in the movie Hereditary, where it went up to a whopping 85 bpm!
Yeah, I don't get scared easily LMAO but the answer is Hereditary!
I'm not sure that's a very good measure of fear, though.
If you showed me an average jump-scare-infused "horror" flick of the variety that gets tossed out by the film-making industry every five minutes or so, you'd see my blood pressure and heart rate spike each time, but five minutes after the end I'd likely not even be able to identify that film it was I'd watched.
On the other hand, The Thing (the John Carpenter version) keeps me feeling unsettled each time I think of it (and has the occasional starring role in my rare nightmares). During the movie, though? Maybe a blood pressure increase, and a slight increase in heart rate. But nothing compared to the jump-scare fodder.
Scientific proof!
Threads (1984). I was in shock for a week when I first saw that. No horror film has come close.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Never been one to get scared by horror movies. I just can't get the buy in necessary to feel scared for the characters. However, the closest to traditional horror I can think of that really was effective was Green Room. It's intense in its loud parts and tense in it's quiet. It's realistic modern cult horror.
If you expand the field out a bit and look to more of a 'leaves you with dread about reality' effect, 'When the Wind Blows' is very affecting. It's animated but the story is quite realistic.
The only horror that has really had an effect on me is The Descent. I think it’s the claustrophobic nature of being underground and then hunted by those things. I can’t think of any other horror that has sent a shiver literally all the way down my spine before.
If you liked The Descent, you should try As Above, So Below. They felt very similar to me.
load more comments
(3 replies)
A Serbian Film wasn't scary but it was the most horrific thing I've ever seen and would never watch it again.
Hard to say what the scariest is because I don't personally find movies scary.
- The Exorcist (1973).
- Funny Games (1997).
- Eden Lake (2008).
- Dear Zachary: A Letter to a Son About His Father (2008).
- -
✍︎ arscyni.cc: modernity ∝ nature.
Jacob's Ladder (1990)
Doesn't look like it but no single other film shattered me as much as this one when I first saw it, well, in the 90s.
This was my answer too - this film really got under my skin in a way that most traditional scary films don't, and Tim Robbins is riveting, as always. I was not prepared.
This was my answer too - this film really got under my skin in a way that most traditional scary films don’t, and Tim Robbins is riveting, as always. I was not prepared.
Neither was I. Would you have known younger me of back then it would not have come as surprise to say I was a little more than receptive to this movie. Watching it, I was absolutely terrified and shattered. Like you said, Time Robin was amazing as he often is.
Man, it is such a sleeper! The title doesn't make it obvious as a horror film, and it isn't one of the bigger successes, but it is awesome
Heard this title my while life, only today learned it's a horror movie.
It is, indeed :)
SKINAMARINK.
Two kids wake up in the middle of the night, and things are just ... Not right. The door's not where it's supposed to be, the chairs in the dining room aren't right, mum and dad are acting odd...
It's such a primal form of horror for me, when simple things are just - different... It's either painfully boring for people, or uniquely terrifying.
I tried to watch that but I couldn't figure out at all what was going on. I eventually just turned it off I was so lost.
What did I miss?
Fair enough, a CBC News review said
"Even though [Skinamarink] has cemented its place as one of my favourite releases of 2023, I almost feel I'd have better odds playing Russian roulette with a fully loaded gun than finding someone to recommend it to who'd actually enjoy it."
It's not a narrative film as much as just a mood, an evocation, tapping into a very unique experience.
Nothing. It was shit.
I think if you're expecting traditional horror, it's more likely just going to frustrate for sure.
You either have the fear the director is trying to evoke, or you don't.
I wasn't expecting traditional horror, but I was expecting at least a traditional movie instead of like an hour and a half of the tops of doors with some grunting.
I've trawled many streaming services looking for horror, and I've watched some of the worst drivel imaginable in the far depths of Amazon Prime, but at least they were all still movies. This is more an arthouse thing.
Lord that does sound scary
as far as feature films go, probably the shining. I found the blood coming down the hallway to be really unsettling. also, since I'm a huge wuss, there were a couple analog horror series that freaked me out; in particular, dreams of an insomniac by pastra on youtube. I'd highly recommend that one, mainly due to how cool the art direction is.
The Thing (OG, of course) unreasonably scared me, so much so that while shivering during the blood test scene I was thinking to myself “This is literally all practical effects why am I so utterly terrified?”
I love that movie! IMO the practical effects make it more unsettling. It feels more real than CGI even if some of those effects look pretty fake.
load more comments
(1 replies)
The OG was from 1951. You mean the 1982 remake.
I had the 2011 reboot in mind :P
I’ve had 2 sleep paralysis episodes in my life and both of them were themed around The Grudge. I’ve never really been scared by horror movies before or since I saw that at the cinema as a teenager, but for some reason that movie rocked me. It also started my lifelong obsession with Ju-On (though I have never rewatched The Grudge) and Asian horror in general.
Kayako is the ultimate ghost villain; once you are cursed, you are fucked. There is no protection ritual, no solving of unfinished business, no escaping a haunted location. She can get to you anywhere, any time of day. She can distort reality to trap you and even time travel. I have goosebumps while writing this comment!
I've also had two episodes of SP but I didn't know what they were until after the first one, which was a generic old "witch" sitting on my chest. However, by the time I got the second one I had read up enough about it that I thought it wouldn't be so bad - nope, it was just as terrifying of not more so because I knew what was happening and couldn't really do anything about it
my sp episodes usually consist of me being bound in some way, usually by and invisible force. my first one was really horrifying, with my vision going all red and black, and the one thought racing through my mind being "you have to wake up". now they're usually just met with feelings of annoyance that I can't simply wake up, lol.
also recently began gaining the ability to lucid dream, which has had some scary results as well. one time where it happened, I was in a messed-up version of an old childhood house, and I kept calling out "hello" to see if anyone would help me. another one was where I was looking in the mirror, sad that I had three eyes. then, I became lucid because I remembered that I'm not supposed to have three eyes.
load more comments
(1 replies)
The only time I have ever turned a horror movie off because of how uncomfortable it made me was when I was watching Jordan Peels "Us".
All his films are worth a watch!
load more comments
(3 replies)
I'm weird with horror movies. Have been my entire life.
Even as a little kid, the fact that the movie was a movie was enough that they didn't scare me. It was just fun, and maybe (in some cases) exciting the same way action movies can be. Even jump scares didn't hit as hard as they do other people I've watched a lot of horror with, and they rarely work nowadays because they're easy to predict.
However, that doesn't mean my subconscious was entirely immune to things. Damn near it, but not entirely.
Two horror movies gave me dreams, but only one ever gave me nightmares, as in scary dreams.
The Exorcist had me having some really intense dreams. They weren't scary, they were more like action movies inside my head, but it was still the kind of thing that would break me out of sleep, sweaty and breathing hard.
But the one that gave me actual nightmares? Manitou
The movie itself wasn't super great, in terms of quality, though it was better than average. But it's no Exorcist, you dig? It won't win big awards or end up on top ten lists, but it's watchable even today.
But holy fuck did the premise fuck with my little head. I wanna say I was six or seven when we watched it. And, before anyone gets frisky, I was one of those kids that loved horror movies, and had zero issues with them. My parents were pretty careful early on, but the way I just ate up classic horror like the Universal and Hammer stuff when it would be on and I'd catch it, quickly made them realize they didn't have to worry.
But for three nights after that movie, I'd have nightmares about things growing out of me. It wasn't even things from the movie itself, it was the idea of my body being taken over like that.
You'd think that would mean body horror would be a favourite subgenre, or maybe something that would still get to me, but those few nightmares were it. I like body horror, but it doesn't get past my awareness of it being a movie.
But yeah, boy, The Manitou sticks out because of that. I don't rewatch it often because I don't want the memory of those nightmares watered down. They were terrifying, and at the time it was unpleasant, but as time passed and I came to enjoy horror films as an art form, the fact that that one movie sank into me like that is a cherished memory. Something broke through that awareness, the disbelief I couldn't entirely suspend, and I've never had that experience again. So I I don't want the power of that memory weakened if I can avoid it
As a kid, it was Pet Cemetery; but, like, the flashback part of the wife's sick sister.
As an adult, it was The Fourth Kind. I had gotten pretty drunk and high before putting it on, and I didn't know jack shit about it so I thought that the "real" footage was, you know, real and when they showed a guy floating off the couch in the therapist office with the "real" footage I freaked out. 🤣
The 2004 Thai movie Shutter.
Still haunts me.
The Woman in Black with Daniel Radcliffe is absolutely terrifying. not jump scarey, just intense dread and horror as some of the scenes linger on.
the sequel was alright but couldn't quite match the intensity
I didn't find it that scary but based on it's popularity, I went to see the stage production in London - it was awful and pretty much all the "horror" relied on jump scares with loud music/noise stings.
Honestly the closest to reality that drove me sick was the OG, Texas Chainsaw Massacre. It’s so fucking gross and terrifying.
view more: next ›