this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2025
24 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

9498 readers
974 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Election Interference / Misinformation

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It blows my mind that we're denying qualified candidates a career in medicine. We're short 22,000 doctors and 28,000 nurses.

We should have a full court press from the federal and provincial governments to train those professionals. And recognizing foreign credentials (etc).

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago

With that kind of shortage, I will not be surprised to see more doctors and nurses from the US move to Canada soon. The brain drain in the US is going to be something awful.

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The provinces only have so many spots available for med students, and there are limited spots for residency for all new doctors.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I totally understand that. But given the shit situation we're in, we should start looking for ways to train more docs than are leaving the profession.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The way to train more docs is to build more medical schools, more hospitals. Gotta lay out the big money for that!

The other problem we have is the demographic bubble. The population is still aging. As the boomers approach their 80s the medical costs of caring for them will rise exponentially.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 3 points 12 hours ago

build more medical schools, more hospitals. Gotta lay out the big money for that!

I'm all for that!

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

test takers are [only] told which of four tiers they fall into, from highest to lowest — relative to other people taking the test at the same time

Which means that you could theoretically take the test twice, give exactly the same answers, and score in the highest tier one time and in the lowest tier the other. How is this a useful tool for evaluating anything?

[–] Grabthar@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Makes sense if you run it once per year and use the results to determine the admissions list. This assumes your goal is to maximize the number of doctors trained each year given a limited number of slots available. If you can take it whenever you want and it is just another hurdle to get into med school, then I'm not sure what value your score relative to your cohort is. Maybe it assumes all classes should have equally capable applicants, and since the content of a test would necessarily change to prevent cheating, they can't guarantee that all tests will be of equal difficulty. So to even that out, they just take the top performers from each cohort.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There is zero chance this personality test doesn't isn't also biased based on ethnicity, gender, and disability status. It is absolutely certain that it is. All opaque personality tests like these always are.

[–] loonsun@sh.itjust.works 3 points 22 hours ago

This is a situational judgement test, not a personality test, they are not the same thing