this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2025
18 points (100.0% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

4762 readers
324 users here now

/c/TenFoward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Remember that diversity and coexistence are Star Trek values. Any post/comments that are racist, anti-LGBT, or generally "othering" of a group will result in removal/ban.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon'

~ 8. No Political Upheaval. Political commentary is allowed, but please keep discussions civil. Read here for our community's expectations.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

!startrek@lemmy.world

!memes@lemmy.world

!tumblr@lemmy.world

!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

specifically paradoxes.

Ignoring the one instance of branched time that I know of (the Kelvin timeline), assuming that the prime universe has a single dynamic timeline (considering all the times Voyager reset the timeline):

my thoughts are time travel creates a permanent linkage between two points in the timeline.

  • The linkage stores all changes caused by the time travel.
  • Linkages are vulnerable to paradoxes.
  • Too much paradox stress causes the linkage to rot and break. (like an old rope?)
  • If a linkage breaks, all changes it caused are naturally lost, thus the timeline self corrects.

I haven't seen much around about how paradoxes would physically work. this just came to mind and makes the most sense to me, I'm curious if something like this has been explored before?

very simple illustration below, black line is the main timeline, red line is a linkage created by time travel:

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] teft@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Time is a obviously a closed loop. Jeremy Bearimy baby.

[–] bappity@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

WHAT THE FORK??????????

[–] semisimian@startrek.website 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When we talk about time travel in fictional universes, almost all of the narratives follow one of three "truths:"

  1. Time is one linear thread. What you do now will have consequence X and if you do something different it will have consequence Y. A simple illustration is the movie Sliding Doors. But the same can be said for Back to the Future or Bill and Ted's. If you make a change to the prime timeline, it will ripple into the past/future. Your cousins will disappear from the 3x5 photo!

  2. Time has branches, a truly infinite number of universes and possibilities. Really, as far as I'm concerned, the best example of this idea is Rick and Morty. That show has the freedom to both cook our brains about the concept and also hold a mirror to its ridiculousness. You also see it more famously in the MCU, with their multitude of Lokis and such, though the TVA is still hell-bent on a prime timeline. But the multiverse is the natural order, with only 80s inspired bureaucracy to keep it in check.

  3. Time is a combination of the two, which leads us to Trek. Time is linear, so Jake Sisko can tell his dad to dodge a beam that travels at light speed. But time is also non-linear, so... I dunno... most of Voyager. When Seven came aboard with her temporal node all bets were off as far as what could even be considered a prime timeline.

Moreso, the mirror universe is a parallel to our own, marching along at the same pace and whose characters are developing at the same rate as the prime timeline. So, there is no prime timeline, and no multiverse. Just the clean-shaven and the goatee universes.

And to answer your question: yes, I think Trek trends toward a "prime" timeline. It's honestly the way our brains work. With all the posturing of the wormhole aliens, we just don't work in a non-linear fashion. And maybe more importantly, good stories don't work that way either, Kurt Vonnegut aside. Time travel is wearing plot armor in EVERY movie and show because no one has a handle on it.

Thank you for bringing this up. It's something I think about too much.

[–] bappity@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

in reality it's all a big ball of timey wimey wibbly wobbly stuff

[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

To further illustrate is our Science correspondent ~~Doc Doom~~:

Edit: Egregious error emendation below

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Like I was saying... our Science correspondent Doc "Kruge" Doom:

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 4 points 1 day ago

Unfortunately, he died after being shot midair by Libyans while falling off a cliff into molten drip.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Ignoring the one instance of branched time that I know of (the Kelvin timeline), assuming that the prime universe has a single dynamic timeline

What about the "mirror mirror" universe where the Federation never came to be and instead the Terran Empire arose?

There's also time travel in the mirror universe where the USS Defiant (NCC-1764) as seen in ST:Dis (not the Defiant from DS9) was sent to the mirror universe, then also back in time to be found by Jonathan Archer of the prime universe ST:ENT when he was in the mirror universe.

[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When it's all said and done, just best to know where your towel is.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wish I could give you more upvotes.

both the gif and the comment. Always keep your towel handy.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

And "Don't Panic".

[–] bappity@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

true!!!! argh!!!!!!!!!

[–] paradox2011@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Interesting, I'm working my way through Voyager now, I'll keep this in mind when I run in to those episodes. It makes me think of Stargate Universe too, lots of time travel in that show. They seem to always give you the perspective of the successive version of the group and the "originals" get sloughed off pretty regularly.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

voyager, IMO, is a classic example of why authors should stay the fuck away from messing with time travel. Just leave the universe as causal. Once you open the time machine, it becomes god and you just roll it out everytime you write yourself into a corner.

[–] paradox2011@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Haha, yeah time travel strays in to deus ex machina territory pretty easily. It can make for an interesting story if done well, but usually ends up feeling cheap and lowering the emotional stakes.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

Dr. Who, for example, or that ds9 trible-tribute episode.

[–] bappity@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

OH and the reason they retain certain things after timeline resets like Harry Kim and the slipstream drive could be because one end of the linkage would rot off but the other end would still be kinda connected ?

like depending on where each point of the linkage is, one side could be weaker to paradoxes than the other