this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
50 points (100.0% liked)

Beehaw Support

2805 readers
1 users here now

Support and meta community for Beehaw. Ask your questions about the community, technical issues, and other such things here.

A brief FAQ for lurkers and new users can be found here.

Our September 2024 financial update is here.

For a refresher on our philosophy, see also What is Beehaw?, The spirit of the rules, and Beehaw is a Community


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.


if you can see this, it's up  

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

hey folks, we'll be quick and to the point with this one:

we have made the decision to defederate from lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works. we recognize this is hugely inconvenient for a wide variety of reasons, but we think this is a decision we need to take immediately. the remainder of the post details our thoughts and decision-making on why this is necessary.

we have been concerned with how sustainable the explosion of new users on Lemmy is--particularly with federation in mind--basically since it began. i have already related how difficult dealing with the explosion has been just constrained to this instance for us four Admins, and increasingly we're being confronted with external vectors we have to deal with that have further stressed our capabilities (elaborated on below).

an unfortunate reality we've also found is we just don't have the tools or the time here to parse out all the good from all the bad. all we have is a nuke and some pretty rudimentary mod powers that don't scale well. we have a list of improvements we'd like to see both on the moderation side of Lemmy and federation if at all possible--but we're unanimous in the belief that we can't wait on what we want to be developed here. separately, we want to do this now, while the band-aid can be ripped off with substantially less pain.

aside from/complementary to what's mentioned above, our reason for defederating, by and large, boils down to:

  • these two instances' open registration policy, which is extremely problematic for us given how federation works and how trivial it makes trolling, harassment, and other undesirable behavior;
  • the disproportionate number of moderator actions we take against users of these two instances, and the general amount of time we have to dedicate to bad actors on those two instances;
  • our need to preserve not only a moderated community but a vibe and general feeling this is actually a safe space for our users to participate in;
  • and the reality that fulfilling our ethos is simply not possible when we not only have to account for our own users but have to account for literally tens of thousands of new, completely unvetted users, some of whom explicitly see spaces like this as desirable to troll and disrupt and others of whom simply don't care about what our instance stands for

as Gaywallet puts it, in our discussion of whether to do this:

There's a lot of soft moderating that happens, where people step in to diffuse tense situations. But it's not just that, there's a vibe that comes along with it. Most people need a lot of trust and support to open up, and it's really hard to trust and support who's around you when there are bad actors. People shut themselves off in various ways when there's more hostility around them. They'll even shut themselves off when there's fake nice behavior around. There's a lot of nuance in modding a community like this and it's not just where we take moderator actions- sometimes people need to step in to diffuse, to negotiate, to help people grow. This only works when everyone is on the same page about our ethos and right now we can't even assess that for people who aren't from our instance, so we're walking a tightrope by trying to give everyone the benefit of the doubt. That isn't sustainable forever and especially not in the face of massive growth on such a short timeframe.

Explicitly safe spaces in real life typically aren't open to having strangers walk in off the street, even if they have a bouncer to throw problematic people out. A single negative interaction might require a lot of energy to undo.

and, to reiterate: we understand that a lot of people legitimately and fairly use these instances, and this is going to be painful while it's in effect. but we hope you can understand why we're doing this. our words, when we talk about building something better here, are not idle platitudes, and we are not out to build a space that grows at any cost. we want a better space, and we think this is necessary to do that right now. if you disagree we understand that, but we hope you can if nothing else come away with the understanding it was an informed decision.

this is also not a permanent judgement (or a moral one on the part of either community's owner, i should add--we just have differing interests here and that's fine). in the future as tools develop, cultures settle, attitudes and interest change, and the wave of newcomers settles down, we'll reassess whether we feel capable of refederating with these communities.

thanks for using our site folks.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thegiddystitcher@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

Ok so TLDR for people who don't quite know what this means.

Beehaw are going for a walled garden approach and cutting off our access to content from some of the bigger instances. This is fine, it's their right as instance admins and it creates a safer space for anyone who was only browsing Beehaw local communities anyway. It's best they've done this now before even more people join, but it does suck for those of us who already built a nice feed.

As users we now have a decision to make. If you're an active member of a community on one of these two instances, you'll probably need to migrate your account.

If you're an active member of a community on another instance, bear in mind if that instance grows large you may then be in the same position.

The bad news is there's no easy way to migrate accounts here like there is on Mastodon, and we're going to have to resubscribe to everything all over again from whichever instance we move to. Unless anyone knows any handy tool or anything?

(p.s. It seems like I can still click through to my communities on, say, lemmy.world but presumably they'll no longer update. This is going to really confuse people as there's no visual indicator that the community is blocked from my pov)

[–] lixus98@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

My questions are:
Will you defederate from every instance that has an "open registration policy" if it floods beehaw's feed with shitposts?
What type of trolling are you seeing?
What can you tell to mods of magazines/communities or admins of instances to look out for?

[–] SindriDeLaMancha@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

"we have a list of improvements we’d like to see both on the moderation side of Lemmy and federation if at all possible" so out of curiosity whats on that list

[–] Owaissa@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

Plenty of responses here but adding mine in the spirit of open discussion. I appreciate this step. Was starting to see too many posts that I didn’t want and worried that this was going to do the way of other socials I’ve already left. I’m looking forward to tracking the growth of the fediverse and appreciate the thoughtful approach.

[–] UnitCircle@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Well I was worried, but I can still access the communities I'm subscribed to from those instances so I can appreciate this more.

My biggest issue with Reddit has been the lack of nuanced discussion. Everything is just black or white. If we can keep that element out of this instance I'll be happy.

[–] ghostalmedia@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It looks like I can still see new beehaw content in instances like LW. Also, I can POST to beehaw communities in LW. For example: Beehaw folks didn't see this post to beehaw News, but LW folks did.

https://lemmy.world/post/158352

Isn't this super dangerous? Couldn't I post a bunch of hateful content under a beehaw community flag that a large portion of the Lemmy user base would see. What's stopping trolls from posting !lgbtq_plus@beehaw.org and making it look like c/lgbtq_plus is a place for lgbtq+ hate?

[–] UnitCircle@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Wow. Yeah this seems like big oversight

[–] thgs@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Not entirely sure on what is the oversight.

I've been reading for AP these days so it's out of my understanding so far.. I might be wrong.

So from my understanding, the owner is the one that is responsible for holding the master copy. Given that the community is a owned by beehaw, all other places except LW that actually accepted the message(s) shouldn't see it.

Otherwise LW would have to ask beehaw every time if the message should be accepted, which would be very problematic and not close to federation but more like replication ("every server using activity pub is an active relay").

Imagine sending an email and your server not accepting until it receives a positive answer from the recipients server that your mail was accepted. You wouldn't see your email at the sent folder up until 4 days. You wouldn't even know if you actually sent the message after you click the send button.

Also excuse my lengthy post, I think it's because understanding AP is recent for me.

If anyone that has a better understanding than me, please feel free to correct me

[–] ghostalmedia@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The concern is that, if you go to LW and are still subbed to beehaw communities over there, you can still post to those communities. Beehaw users will never see those posts from LW, and LW users will never see new posts from BH users, BUT LW users will see LW posts to the old community appendage.

Meaning, you can now effectively impersonate a beehaw community on LW after it has been de-federated.

[–] kksgandhi@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Wait, so just to confirm, I won't lose any of the communities I'm subscribed to?

That's a relief, I thought I was going to lose out on a lot of the Lemmyverse.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Synthclair@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The posts and communities are frozen from the time the defederation took place onwards - only a "local" Beehaw copy remains.

[–] ghostalmedia@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Then why do I still see new beehaw community content in LW?

[–] 1993_toyota_camry@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Those posts were made by local LW users, and can only be seen by local users of that instance.

Compare it to the real thing https://beehaw.org/c/news

[–] ghostalmedia@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ahh, that make sense now. Super confusing though. New users are going to think that content is coming from beehaw, but it’s not. Yikes.

[–] 1993_toyota_camry@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

For sure.

This is definitely a situation that could be handled better by the lemmy code.

[–] OverfedRaccoon@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So is this a defederation thing? I'm going to assume. Otherwise, what's the point of being federated if I sub to another community on another instance and only the people from my instance can see those comments? Or am I missing something?

[–] 1993_toyota_camry@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Yeah, it's because of the de-federation.

A cached copy of the community exists on the remote instances, and users are able to engage with it.

It seems de-federation stops the updates, but doesn't remove remote copies of the communities. It's not really an ideal situation, as I'm sure many users don't realize they're not engaging with the real community.

I've actually seen some posts to that effect: "oh defederation isn't so bad, I can still see everything / post". Those users will be in for a surprise in a day or two when they realize.

[–] OverfedRaccoon@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Okay, cool. I appreciate the quick reply. I thought for half a second I didn't really understand all of this like I thought haha. That makes way more sense. Thanks again!

[–] 1993_toyota_camry@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

np.

I love how fast the discussion can be here. Near-instant.

[–] Hellebert@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Personally at least I had no expectations of your team moderating or otherwise being responsible for the content coming from those instances and thought it was enough to use the new icon set to clearly identify content from Beehaw vs the others.

It's a shame because such a move feels very anti-fediverse to me but I am new to the platform so take my opinion with a grain of salt.

[–] rs5th@lemmy.scottlabs.io 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think the larger issue was users from those external instances interacting with posts / comments in Beehaw’s communities. Since they’re open registration, bad actors could just create new accounts after being banned from Beehaw.

[–] Hellebert@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Isn't this always going to be a problem though? They can just go to other servers with open registration and do the same thing, the only way to avoid that is to never federate at all with the current tools available.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fluffybirb@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Thank you for letting us know! I understand that it's a difficult and nuanced decision to have to make. For what it's worth, I really appreciate this call. Most of the reason I chose beehaw was to have a safe place where I felt able to open up more and actually participate in a community without fear of hostile or aggressive interactions, and having bad actors infiltrate would probably have sent me back into my online shell again.

I know not everyone will be able to understand fully, but especially if you're neurospicy and have difficulty regulating emotion, rock-bottom self esteem, executive functioning issues, etc. it is exponentially harder to deal with, process and compartmentalise (if possible at all) negative experiences online. I know for myself I need space and time to be able to build up resilience and internal processes to handle it, and bring thrown in the deep end is more destructive than helpful (I'm 36 and had it tried on me multiple times with people using the 'cruel to be kind' approach. All it does is dismantle what little self esteem I scrape together).

Tl;DR, thank you for making this decision and keeping beehaw a safe place to be until you get the tools and resources you need to open up again. 🥰 I know that if I do want to go and check out the other instances, I can just make a new account over there and still have my cosy place here to retreat to if needed for wholesome discussions. <3

[–] CalamityKitz@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

As someone who works with kids that are very emotionally driven and often have low self esteem, I fully get you :) You're awesome, and we're glad to have you here!

[–] Fluffybirb@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

Thank you so much, that's very kind! <3

[–] gmg@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't really know enough about this lemmy thing to comment on the merit of your decision... let me just thank for putting so much thought on this for my sake too.

Could you clarify what "defederating" entails precisely? Does this affect only the communities @beehaw.org (as if all users from those servers had been banned), or does it mean that I won't be able to see communities, posts and comments from those servers through beehaw.org (as if those servers didn't exist)? is the effect retroactive (ie. do already existing posts and comments disappear)?

[–] fishy_2_0@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Defederating means that for all intents and purposes beehaw and lemmy.world dont exist to each other its like if you and another person just agreed to not talk anymore and deleted each others phone number the posts that have federated over still exist but they wont be updated in any way

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheLastOfHisName@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Growth comes with growing pains. Sometimes those growing pains mean making tough decisions. I see this decision as thinking of the long game, and I'm fine with that.

I have a separate account at Lemmy.world, and I can log into that if I want, but honestly, I've been enjoying my time here more. There are still some aspects of federation that I haven't gotten my head around, but I'm trying to learn.

Anyhoo, thanks to our admins/moderators for your transparency. It's very much appreciated.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›