this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2025
401 points (92.9% liked)

Technology

69041 readers
2986 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Too bad the US can't import any of it.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

they can if they pay 6382538% tariffs.

or was it 29403696%?

[–] errer@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

“These chips are 10,000 times faster, therefore we will increase our tariffs to 10,100%!”

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Brother, have you heard of buses? Even INSIDE cpus/socs bus speeds are a limitation. Also i fucking hate how the first thing people mention now is how ai could benefit from a jump in computing power.

Edit: I havent dabbled that much in high speed stuff yet but isnt the picosecond range so fast that the capacitance of simple traces and connectors between chips influence the rising and falling edge of chips?

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 8 points 1 day ago

That's pretty much my understanding. Most of the advancements happened in memory speeds are related to the physical proximity of the memory and more efficient transmission/decoding.

GDDR7 chips for example are packed as close as physically possible to the GPU die, and have insane read speeds of 28 Gbps/pin (and a 5090 has a 512-bit bus). Most of the limitation is the connection between GPU and RAM, so speeding up the chips internally 1000x won't have a noticeable impact without also improving the memory bus.

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 day ago

Wow, finally graphene has been cracked. Exciting times for portable low-energy computing

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Does flash, like solid state drives, have the same lifespan in terms of write? If so, it feels like this would most certainly not be useful for AI, as that use case would involve doing billions/trillions of writes in a very short span of time.

Edit: It looks like they do: https://www.enterprisestorageforum.com/hardware/life-expectancy-of-a-drive/

Manufacturers say to expect flash drives to last about 10 years based on average use. But life expectancy can be cut short by defects in the manufacturing process, the quality of the materials used, and how the drive connects to the device, leading to wide variations. Depending on the manufacturing quality, flash memory can withstand between 10,000 and a million [program/erase] cycles.

[–] schema@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

For AI processing, I don't think it would make much difference if it lasted longer. I could be wrong, but afaik, running the actual transformer for AI is done in VRAM, and staging and preprocessing is done in RAM. Anything else wouldn't really make sense speed and bandwidth wise.

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Oh I agree, but the speeds in the article are much faster than any current volatile memory. So it could theoretically be used to vastly expand memory availability for accelerators/TPUs/etc for their onboard memory.

I guess if they can replicate these speeds in volatile memory and increase the buses to handle it, then they'd be really onto something here for numerous use cases.

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is that fast enough to put an LLM in swap and have decent performance?

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Note that this in theory speaks to performance of a non volatile memory. It does not speak to cost.

We already have a faster than NAND non volatile storage in phase change memory . It failed due to expense.

If this thing is significantly more expensive even than RAM, then it may fail even if it is everything it says it is. If it is at least as cheap as ram, it'll be huge since it is faster than RAM and non volatile.

Swap is indicated by cost, not by non volatile characteristics.

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This sounds like that material would be more useful in high performance radars, not as flash memory

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It‘s likely BS anyway. Maybe it’s just me but reading about another crazy breakthrough from China every single day during this trade war smells fishy. Because I‘ve seen the exact same propaganda strategy during the pandemic when relations between China and the rest of the world weren‘t exactly the best. A lot of those headlines coming from there are just claims about flashy topics with very little substance or second guessing. And the papers releasing the stories aren‘t exactly the most renowned either.

[–] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago

It's definitely possible they're amplifying these developments to maintain confidence in the Chinese market, but I doubt they're outright lying about the discoveries. I think it's also likely that some of what they've been talking about has been in development for a while and that China is choosing now to make big reveals about them.

[–] vegetvs@kbin.earth 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] easily3667@lemmus.org 6 points 1 day ago

I don't remember the scene but it looks like memory from an Android. Not sparkly enough for star trek, maybe terminator 2?

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well, I'll never see it, unless TI or another American company designs their own version.

[–] Viri4thus@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Or they can do what they normally do, steal it and then sue to be considered the original invento/founder and then make a Hollywood film about how they invented it/found it.

[–] peteyestee@feddit.org 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's called an iPod, it's not an mp3 player.

They are called airpods, they are not earbuds.

[–] vegetvs@kbin.earth 2 points 1 day ago

It's called an airplane, not an aeroplane.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›