this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2025
596 points (97.5% liked)

politics

23036 readers
3168 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump reportedly held up a digitally altered image of the hand of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland man who was deported by the Trump administration, in an attempt to prove Garcia is a gang member.

Trump can be seen holding a printed-out photo... demonstrating that "MS-13" is tattooed across his knuckles.

"This is the hand of the man that the Democrats feel should be brought back," Trump posted. However, many have pointed out that the image appears photoshopped.

"MS-13 looks like it was typed on the photo." "Needing to have a photo doctored... is definitely something a psychopath would do."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] techclothes@lemmy.world 3 points 58 minutes ago

Even if it wasn't. We don't throw people in jail, much less deport them for tattoos. I know some people in thr Trump shitshow who should go to jail for their tattoos if this is what they want to start doing.

[–] RizzoTheSmall@lemm.ee 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

You wanna bring up possibility of criminal history as an argument against someone being entitled to their rights as a US citizen? Let's not throw big and obvious stones in very precarious glass houses.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 18 points 8 hours ago

What insults me more than anything is that he thinks I am so stupid that I would accept that obviously doctored photo as real. I felt the same way when he pitched his hurricane weather map with his Sharpie edit.

Hey, HitlerPig, we aren't all as stupid as you, and the people around you.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Who do I trust?

A lying asswipe who wouldn't know the truth if it slapped him in his orange face?

A man I don't know that has been sent to a foreign nation's prison for no reason?

Easy choice.

[–] SSNs4evr@leminal.space 9 points 9 hours ago

Trump - "I bet photoshop is one of those computer thingies...I definitely didn't use that."

[–] WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago

You mean the US government had someone they considered a terrorist and instead of holding them, they released them?

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 66 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

It's nice to see Trump can learn and grow. It wasn't that long ago when he would have just scribbled it with a sharpie. Anyway, it must really annoy Trump that thanks to Senator Van Hollen's visit, where he proved he could do what Trump admitted that he himself could not, we now have unadulterated photos of Garcia's hand without the shitty photoshop.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 5 points 10 hours ago

Even if it wasn't, it would still be won't to kidnap and throw him into a concentration camp without due process.

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago

I mean at least he didn't use a sharpie this time....

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 69 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (3 children)

At this point, the guy could be a rabid neonazi pedophile for all I care: he should still not have been deported without a trial. People are presumed innocent until proven guilty in court. Do your fucking job.

[–] spicehoarder@lemm.ee 14 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Why would a cop get deported?

[–] caboose2006@lemm.ee 2 points 11 hours ago

Or a senator.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

People are presumed innocent until proven guilty in court.

That was in the last century or so.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Uppp@lemm.ee 20 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

How much more do they need to impeach this liar ?

[–] Draegur@lemm.ee 14 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

Look. I wish he could be removed by impeachment. But we need to accept that he's an outlaw.

He is a clear proponent of extrajudicial capital punishment.

Only an overdose of his own medicine will take him down.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 3 points 8 hours ago

The SCOTUS immunity superpowers aren't the gift he thinks. All they did was remove the civilized options for his removal, leaving nothing but the worst case scenario options for him.

[–] RealFknNito@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The only two things that could remove Trump early is a military coup, an armed revolution, or both.

A sniper or cyanide could also work.

Or a Luigi

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 38 points 17 hours ago (10 children)

Ok, so what happened here is that police added letters to the photo explaining what each symbol means. Some idiots on twitter thought those added letters are the claimed MS-13 tattoo. It's not clear if Trump also thought that those letters were actually tattooed, probably yes.

[–] HipHoboHarold@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

And itd amazing to me how this is another of this shit is dumb, we dont need to make stuff up to complain about it being dumb

Like the excuses for the symbols dont make sense. We can just call that out. We dont need to lie.

[–] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Bruh. So they went from M to S to 1 to 3? Instead of A to B to C … to 1 to 2 to 3?

No. Don’t try to muddy the waters and spread more supposition as fact. Trump has already been proven to alter images to fit his own internal incorrect narrative, just look at that hurricane path incident from his last term. All evidence and common sense points to someone digitally editing this picture in order to fabricate support for this man’s illegal deportation.

[–] HipHoboHarold@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I think the point is that we all know they put in the MS13 digitally

The argument isnt against that

We all know it

The argument is that the republicans arent arguing he literally has MS13 tattooed

But that even they know that was added

And thats its just added to help people figure out why the tattoos would represent MS13

Its not that Republicans are saying the edited in part is part of the tattoo

Just that the tattoos that are there represent MS13

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] troglodytis@lemmy.world 49 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

So umm.... What's the problem? Return. Prove it in a court of law. Due process for all. It doesn't matter who the person is or what they've done. What matters is how the government acts.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 16 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

The problem is that they are trying to do away with due process. They want to be able to throw anyone they want into a gulag in another country where they will disappear forever. They start with immigrants, claiming that they are gang members and terrorists. They are refusing to prove it because they want to set the precedent that they do not need to prove their claims. They start with alleged foreign gang members, then will come "homegrowns," as Trump has called them.

If we don't make them prove their claims now in a court of law, it'll be that much harder to do it later, and they know it.

[–] troglodytis@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago

Sure. We are in agreement. That's exactly why it's important to adhere to our constitution. Due process is an instruction for how to operate our government when looking to use its violent capabilities upon individuals. "No person shall" has nothing to do with who the individual is, only how our government must go about depriving them of "life, liberty, or property", if it sees fit.

Until we change our constitution, due process for all.

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 19 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Even if. Have these people never heard of “ex gang members” I know a guy with gang tattoos who left the gang life 20 years ago. Should he suffer now because of his tattoos?

[–] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 10 points 17 hours ago

Well lets see, is he brown?

[–] Hikuro93@lemmy.world 17 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Even if that's real, which doesn't look like it, what's keeping them from forcing Mr. Garcia onto a chair, hold him down, while they tattoo it?

This administration and their dictator allies have shown to have no constraints, no guardrails, time and time again. Consistently. You can always blindly trust them to bs and lie their way through anything.

You gonna tell me people who tried to stage Mr. Garcia sipping some Margaritas by a hotel pool wouldn't stoop so low as to place fake tattoos on him? Yeah, that's the thing with dishonesty - even if you tell the truth once it's still gonna be called into question. The boy who cried wolf, and all that.

[–] Pavidus@lemmy.world 241 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Alright, I'll take the bait. Let's all assume he has an MS-13 tattoo. What does this change? The dude still gets his constitutional rights, and his day in court. On US soil.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 129 points 1 day ago (4 children)

This is what they always do, get you arguing about something that doesn't matter. Just eats up time and energy about nothing.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›