this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
10 points (56.9% liked)

World News

35901 readers
601 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Neo-Nazism's rise in Ukraine is due to the silent approval of Ukraine’s political and military elites who prefer to turn a blind eye because they rely on the far-right for their military potential, Ukrainian academic Marta Havryshko tells Natylie Baldwin. By Natylie Baldwin Special to Consor

all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ctrl_alt_esc@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

What is that website? Smells like Russian propaganda to me. Lemmy seems to get overrun with ot lately, unfortunately.

[–] Grapho@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 weeks ago

If you want to judge the validity of an article by how sleek and pretty the website looks you can go back to reddit. Plenty of MSM slop straight from the state department.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)
[–] Grapho@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Don't believe your eyes, Putin has paid off your eyeballs and puppeteered all western media right up until 2020

[–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago

I mean. The war began in 2014 with Russia and Ukraine

[–] nargis@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 weeks ago

Baldwin: Can you explain what you see as the misuse of the holocaust and WWII by the Russian government and nationalists?

... Havryshko: The memory of World War II is weaponized by different political actors for political and military purposes. For example, when Putin began his angry speech on the night of February 24, 2022, he emphasized that one of the goals of the so-called “special military operation” was the “denazification” of Ukraine.

Top Russian propagandists frequently refer to the Ukrainian government as a “Nazi regime” and call Ukrainian soldiers “Nazis.”

From the article. The author is a western academic, a historian of Holocaust studies. Read.

[–] badwetter@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

@ctrl_alt_esc@lemmy.ml It's called Journalism. If you'd bother to look, you'd realize that Pulitzer is mentioned on the website, and you wouldn't have to ask such a profoundly silly question.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago

What does Pulitzer have to do with journalism? The opinion of Colombia university holds negative value.

[–] thisnameisnottolong@aussie.zone 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Pro Russia poster. Never a bad word said about Russia or Putin.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

i used to struggle to understand why americans refused to see that the ukrainian far right is so empowered until i came to lemmy and see the election results; now i understand that we've been punching left for so long that the the right seems reasonable.

[–] Wether@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 weeks ago

I'm surprised that this article doesn't engage more with the current war. Given that Russia has been accusing Ukraine of being a 'nazi state' since day one, I'd be surprised if that hadn't changed the level of support for this kind of politics. I can imagine how it could go either way: increasing because of the threat to Ukraine's national identity, or decreasing to not prove the Russians right and to rally around Zelenskyy, who is overall a moderate. I do notice that all of the pictures in this article are from before the war. It's also weird they don't mention that Azov were more-or-less wiped out in the opening stages of the invasion at Mariupol.