this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
359 points (98.9% liked)

politics

23115 readers
3396 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“Millions” of people will lose health insurance if Republicans push these plans through.

Republicans are quietly pushing to slash Medicaid to fund Donald Trump’s tax cuts and immigration spending.

The effort has been subtle and behind the scenes, and disguised as a way to eliminate Medicaid fraud and protect the program’s most vulnerable recipients.

But several Republicans, including House Speaker Mike Johnson, are desperately trying to revive a yearslong fight to eliminate the expanded Medicaid eligibility requirements included in Barack Obama’s Affordable Care Act, which gives millions of low-income adults health coverage.

top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 106 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The Red States will lose their healthcare and find a way to blame Joe Biden.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They won't blame Biden. They'll blame Obama because he's black

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2019/nov/08/viral-image/no-these-photos-dont-show-donald-trump-and-barack-/

Someone made photos of Donald Trump being a hero on 9/11.

I happen to have been working in lower Manhattan at that time. During the recovery efforts, there were some restaurants and hotels that gave free food and/or lodging to the volunteers working at Ground Zero. No Trump property gave anyone so much as a bowl of soup.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

they HAD to cut it don’t you know?

because BIDEN was such a bad economic manager they just didn’t have the money!

no the economy wasn’t doing well! the price of eggs!

bird flu epidemic due to lax regulations? NO it was BIDEN

global cost of living crisis that wasn’t isolated to the USA? pft if biden wasn’t horrible he’d have fixed it for us because the USA is better than everyone else

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 60 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They aren't MAGA Republicans. They are just Republicans. Whatever remnants of sanity those people may have left is not calling the shots.

This is entirely the reason for the non-MAGA Republicans to lick boot, this is why they met Trump at those crossroads and sold their souls. They think fascism is a fair price if it means destroying a government that helps people not like them.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 80 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

What could be worth more? American lives, or more money that billionaires could never spend in a lifetime?

The choice is clear.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 38 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

If people hoarded cats, or junk cars, or Hummel figurines, or beanie babies, etc., the way these people hoard money, theyd be diagnosed with mental illness, and get psychiatric help.

But if a zillionaire has the unquenchable compulsion to destroy EVERYTHING to get just a tiny bit more, he's worshipped as a "job creator."

Its time to start framing this behavior as a mental illness, which should no longer be indulged or tolerated. It needs to be treated, and just like a cat hoarder's cats are removed by the authorities, confiscating much of their financial hoard is the first step.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I would thoroughly be in favor of a max money or max wealth concept. Congratulations. You win! There is no more money to collect.

You are now free to do something else.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] DrDeadCrash@programming.dev 5 points 2 days ago

This is it, right here. Tax wealth and make multi billionaires impossible.

[–] gabbath@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I'm stealing this.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Every year, take the richest person and redistribute 50% of their wealth.

Working hard or smart doesn't make you that kind of money.

[–] CaptainHowdy@lemm.ee 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Your point is very valid.

But even just one billion is more than a whole family could spend in multiple lifetimes!

The difference between a million and a billion dollars is basically a billion dollars, while at the same time a million dollars is more wealth than a VERY large majority of Americans will ever see.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And doesn’t even buy a house in many places.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

See how none of this makes sense anymore? The balance is ruined when cent I centimillionaires and billionaires exist. I'd even say nobody needs to be a millionaire in a sane world.

[–] gabbath@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

For your whole life, $1m is cutting it close — I think for the entirety of a good life in a country like the US or Western Europe, $10m is plentiful. $10m for your whole life, with current cost of living. Anything beyond that should be taxed to oblivion.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The difference between me and a millionaire is about a million dollars and I haven't died. A little destitute yeah.

[–] gabbath@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Same. I was only pointing out that over a human lifetime, it adds up: a total of $1m would be equivalent to living 80 years (rough average lifespan) on $12.5k a year. It's not a lot.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah thats not what I meant by millionaire at all. Thats not even a net worth.

[–] gabbath@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh, I see. Yeah, a net worth that's perpetually in the millions is insane. You could basically live off the interest at that amount and not even need to touch the original money. It's crazy and frankly should be illegal.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Yes, exactly that. All these rich bitches complaining about nobody wanting to work literally dont work. They go wherever their interests take them that week and spew platitudes about work ethics and money movement.

[–] lemmylump@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (5 children)

When people and their loved ones are dying cause they have no access to healthcare, these same people are gonna start shooting those they think are responsible.

Nothing more dangerous than someone with nothing to lose.

Fuck around you maggots and find out.

Assuming they correctly know who is responsible.

[–] glitch1985@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Which is terrifying because the people who are actually responsible for this mess isn't the same as the ones the shooters think.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I have a fear what will happen instead is that the GOP will just send the military to deal with the civilians, as Project2025 envisioned.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Hosea 8:7 or some shit.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago

Not true. We've been losing people because of expensive healthcare for as long as I can remember, and so far only one insurance CEO has been capped.

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago

This is disgusting. How anyone can act this way is beyond my imagination.

[–] Thrashy@lemmy.world 43 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And of course this would be a massive harm to their own voters, because Medicaid expansion has been the only thing keeping most rural community hospitals afloat for a long time. If they cut it, then it's likely that many small towns are going to lose their only medical providers within a hour's drive or more.

[–] voracitude@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Thus continuing the work COVID started and further reducing the voting bloc the right relies on to get elected... right?

[–] Thrashy@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

As ever, working to build the post-apocalyptic wasteland that would finally justify their insistence that they need 500 guns and a fleet of milsurp Humvees to traverse the miles of crumbled roadways between their compounds and the last operating Fortress Hospital in the Dakotan Oil Wastes.

[–] gabbath@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Alas, I think they found a new one in nihilistic young men who want to burn it all down.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

I quote a famous Iowan: Let them die!

[–] BlackSheep@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago