this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
326 points (96.3% liked)

Technology

69491 readers
4033 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sucrerey@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

we had an intern ask AI what it could to to completely enshittify the browser. the AI simply responded, "put me in coach!"

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 53 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

You know how we thought " How could chrome get any worse?" well, we have an answer.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 33 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Are these fucks stupid? Chromium is open sourced. They can do it themselves

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 52 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

They don't want to buy the browser. They want to buy the brand and the users. Chrome makes up over half the browser market. Think of all the data they could extract from Chrome users. It would cost significantly more to fork chromium and grow the user base to a point where they could extract anything valuable from them, and that's assuming they'd be successful enough to make it happen.

[–] mint_tamas@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

There is no way Google would sell Chrome. But you can bet at least a thousand engineers are working on bolting Gemini onto it right now.

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 16 points 6 days ago

There's no way Google would voluntarily sell Chrome. Unfortunately for them, they might be forced to sell Chrome.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

No, MS just wants to expand their monopoly, but "MS buying most common browser, after antitrust laws already forbid internet explorer" doesnt ring so well.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago

I suspect Altman has ambitions beyond being Microsoft's cat's paw, though it may be that that's all he really is once the shouting is over.

[–] RickC137@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] TON618@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

I like to think if people want whatever it is OpenAI thinks browsers need AI for, the userbase will manifest itself.

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago
[–] Fenrir@lemmings.world 20 points 6 days ago

Validating my years old decision to use Firefox

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago

When a company considers buying Chrome because it could help them extend the reach of their product, they are fucking drunk and need to go home. This would be like buying the state of Nevada so you could put up billboards all over Las Vegas.

[–] msage@programming.dev 13 points 6 days ago

Isn't Google going to do it themselves?

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 12 points 6 days ago

WTF? Just download it for free.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 3 points 5 days ago

Well, killing off Chrome would probably be a good thing.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 7 points 6 days ago

And if you thought there was some natural end point to enshittification, here's your evidence that there's no such thing.

[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Chome is already dead... it's just a zombie.

[–] rippersnapper@lemm.ee 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I’ve said this before and will say it again. The only tech companies that should be allowed to buy Chrome are Canonical and its equivalents.

[–] simsalabim@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Isn't Canonical up to some crummy schemes, too?

[–] crimsonpoodle@pawb.social 3 points 6 days ago

Sure but not by at least an order of magnitude

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 158 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Why connect to the Internet with it then. The browser could just make everything up on the fly.

Got questions about a medication?

Maybe you want to check up on some disease symptoms?

AI can make something that sounds vaguely plausible.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 82 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why connect to the Internet with it then

To check if your subscription to their models is still valid of course

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And send back telemetry and training data.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 week ago

Browsing the internet will be like playing AI Quake II, you'll think you are in this alternate universe.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 116 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Sounds like the best thing that could happen to Firefox

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 58 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Unfortunately, Mozilla is investing a ton of money into AI, too.

[–] Bazimon@lemm.ee 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Look into Waterfox instead.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 3 points 6 days ago

That really doesn't solve the problem, like every other Firefox fork they're completely dependent on Firefox. You can't just make a new webbrowser just like that, and while third party developers can certainly disable some anti-features, there are limits to that and they can definitely not do the basic work that the Firefox devs do (or could do, if Mozilla had different priorities).

[–] doodledup@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (5 children)

A desperate attempt of revenue diversification.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] exu@feditown.com 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Some of their I initiatives are good, like the built-in local translation tool we now have.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Mozilla spinning off control of its development to an independent group the way they did with Thunderbird would be the best thing that could happen to Firefox.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Thunderbird :

Operated by MZLA Technologies Corporation, a subsidiary of the Mozilla Foundation, Thunderbird is an independent, community-driven project that is managed and overseen by the Thunderbird Council, which is elected by the Thunderbird community.

Chrome self-destructing because of stupidity like AI would only ever manage to be a close second, at best.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 64 points 1 week ago

OpenAI is like a zombie stumbling around trying to infect everything. We shove it away because it’s fuckin’ gross and we want nothing to do with it, while the bosses that reanimated it are like “well fuck, we made this thing, we have to use it for something.”

[–] neclimdul@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Great! Now not only can chrome eat all my system memory, it can use all my GPU memory at the same time! It's genius!

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Likely it'll use the cloud for processing, you'll just get really hard-to-opt-out AI features, like "prompt by default" and "AI autocomplete", which you can only "snooze" as they'll automatically be turned back on the moment there's a "great new feature", like putting a filter on by default on image generators to fool the eye that it's made by real artists.

[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How the fuck would this be more cost effective than them making their own chrome based browser and not be a demonstration of their over inflated operating costs and company valuation?

If you are paying for a service that is charging you enough to allow them to buy the most widly used browser from a company whose business model is to monopolize data, then maybe you're paying them a titbit more than what the service they're providing is worth.

[–] MysticKetchup@lemmy.world 64 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm sure they're less interested about buying Chrome than they are about buying Chrome's market share

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blinx615@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 week ago

Chromium is open source? What a concept...

[–] Zier@fedia.io 25 points 1 week ago

How to kill Chrome faster, make it AI only. LOL!!!

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

don't they already have brave for that?

[–] madis@lemm.ee 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone -3 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] madis@lemm.ee 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

And is OpenAI somehow related to crypto?

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone -4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

crypto and ai are two sides of the same garbage

They're really not. They're completely unrelated.

load more comments
view more: next ›