UK Politics

3660 readers

225 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

tom@feddit.uk

GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk

flamingos@feddit.uk

frankPodmore@slrpnk.net

236

UK’s first trans judge appeals to European court of human rights over supreme court ruling (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 2 days ago by frankPodmore@slrpnk.net to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk

69 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 36 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's simply bizarre that Labour have chosen this hill to die on. After the SC ruling, Labour should have come out and said: that given the ambiguity in the law has been resolved but in a way that doesn't account for trans people, we will be bringing forward updated legislation to close the gap. Sort of like the whole Civil Partnership vs Marriage idiocy.

The basic principle should be: don't be a cunt. And then work from there.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

It is not bizarre, it is literally their job to move the overturn window right and only punch left.

[–] MrPoletki@feddit.uk 5 points 1 day ago

Labour should have come out and said: that given the ambiguity in the law has been resolved but in a way that doesn’t account for trans people, we will be bringing forward updated legislation to close the gap.

110%

[–] manxu@piefed.social 64 points 2 days ago (62 children)

This is the stupidest culture war, fought with the stupidest people on one side and a marginalized group that really just would like to live a life without fear on the other. Not even "without fear," because apparently that's asking too much. Just no state-sanctioned fear.

load more comments (62 replies)

[–] MrPoletki@feddit.uk 14 points 2 days ago

careful, this could be just what reform need to revive their leave the ECHR bullshit.

[–] SpaceShort@feddit.uk 19 points 2 days ago

Let's go! I hope it is successful.

[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

They could resolve this with more legislation. The 2010/11 equalities act is ambiguous the way it is written so Labour need to pass more legislation to resolve it. "Use the disabled toilets" is not a satisfactory answer.

load more comments