this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
721 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

69600 readers
3386 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Now I understand why at each windows 11 update, they introduce more bugs than ever

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 12 points 2 days ago

Beat me to it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lanske@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (2 children)

That's why their products are so crappy!

[–] phantomwise@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 days ago

No way, they get their results through honest effort. Anyone can make crappy AI products now, but Microsoft have been doing crappy products the hard way for decades. Don't downplay their hard work !

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Is the part that handles images in word

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 16 points 2 days ago

Boy am I glad not having to touch their software.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 days ago (3 children)

“Written by software” does not inherently mean AI.

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella said that 20% to 30% of code inside the company’s repositories was “written by software” — meaning AI.

Nadella gave the figure after Zuckerberg asked roughly how much of Microsoft’s code is AI generated today.

I highlighted part of the article for you.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago

Code written by software doesn't mean AI unless you ignore compilers

Executives lie to boost profits and justify their decisions, I doubt MS execs even know how much of their code is AI generated just like the ad sales company exec they were talking to in the article

[–] sqibkw@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

Windows hate train looks fun, but as someone who works in the industry, most of that code is probably just unit tests and boilerplate stuff.

Copilot is decent at quickly writing huge amounts of mostly correct, tedious unit test code, depending on your language/framework. And since Microsoft works with languages like C# and .NET for their native apps, and likely backend too, there is quite a bit of verbosity that Copilot can take care of. Also, documentation might count as well.

No real code is AI-generated. He's just saying shit like this to keep idiot investors happy.

[–] 10001110101@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'd guess it's mostly the AI autocomplete stuff. I.e. you keep on typing until the AI guesses it right then press tab to save keystrokes. LLMs are really bad at making test cases in my experience; they, ironically, can't do the simple but nuanced computations needed to figure out what the output should be given the inputs, or to recognize and test the edge cases.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 33 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This only makes sense if they are counting intellisense auto complete as "AI written"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

And 100% of their product names are generated by AI. No human would be stupid enough to change something's name for zero reason.

[–] russjr08@bitforged.space 11 points 2 days ago

No human would be stupid enough to change something’s name for zero reason.

Well, unless you're a product manager at Google apparently... Though with them you're lucky if its just a change of name rather than it becoming an entirely "new" thing, or just getting outright axed...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 53 points 3 days ago

Power move by the zucc by first asking how much genai is used at Microsoft then refusing to answer his own question at Facebook 😂

[–] Pirata@lemm.ee 32 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

So this explains why Microsoft Swiftkey is total dogshit now. Also why the Outlook app barely works.

Its unbelievable.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] GooberEar@lemmy.wtf 20 points 2 days ago

This makes sense and would explain the mainline windows versioning and probably the xbox versioning too!

Microsoft to AI: List all the integers from one to eleven.

AI: 3. 95. 98. 2000. XP. Vista. 7. 8. 10. 11.

[–] vane@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If they start with those products today with zero marketing budged and zero user base nobody would use it. Those CEOs are just clowns.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I'm still forced to use Microsoft Outlook and teams, unfortunately, and boy oh boy is it bad.

Yesterday i spent 45 minutes of a 1,5 meeting (that would have been 45 minutes) on trying teams to please try and use the right microphone, please share a screen (not working under Firefox or chrome now, apparently)

I can't wait for the day that I have some time to get us off that dog shit

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 40 points 3 days ago (13 children)

I bet they’re counting code written while someone had an AI plugin installed as “written by AI” and I bet that accounts for almost all of that 30%. On top of that, I’m betting that they made it mandatory to have such a plug in, and the other 70% is just code written before they mandated this.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Tungsten5@lemm.ee 9 points 2 days ago

Well that explains a lot

[–] ddash@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 3 days ago (3 children)

"Up to" can also be 0%. Why is there even a need to say "up to" here.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] hubobes@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago

50% of my code is written by Intellisense...

[–] FergleFFergleson@infosec.pub 31 points 3 days ago

Well, that would explain a lot.

I'm also guessing that at "up to 30%" of the company's leadership decisions are being made by AI too.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›