Just putting this out there, I will never pay for a subscription service in my car. I didn't do it for the radio, I didn't do it for onstar, and I won't do it for anything else. I know I'm not the only one. If a car has a "feature" I have to keep paying for after I bought the car, no it doesn't.
this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
227 points (100.0% liked)
News
30835 readers
2368 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
afaik, even if you don't pay and never pay, features like onstar are still 'active', still have cellular connections enabled, and are still tracking your every move.
And attempting to circumvent them results in a DMCA if you get caught! Wonderful! Fucking clown world we live in.
Huh. I didn't get a DMCA when I unplugged the OnStar module in my car.....
Yeah, because I'm pretty sure DMCA has nothing to do with this. Trying to get a subscription service for free would possibly be a DMCA violation since you are stealing a service.
There are many guides on how to deactivate OnStar.
I know someone that hasn't paid taxes in years. Hasn't been hounded by the IRS yet. Everything in our society is people. People are fallible. The image that the system is working is more powerful than the actual system at work.
Nobody's going to DMCA strike you for removing a fuse
Or because a blown fuse
Correct. The next time I have to buy a car that will be part of my criteria: if I’m paying more than $40k for something that shit doesn’t get to include a subscription.
That's a smart buying strategy, but unless you're actually pulling out the antennas these subscription services use it won't be an effective security strategy
For the time being I won't even buy the car. I know there's going to be a day where that's not possible. But for now, it's immediately off any list of be considering.
There's been an uptick in people interested in the older Ford F-series trucks and C/K Chevs. Barebones dash, heating & A/C system, radio, glove box. No weird electronic options, to Lowjack, nothing. I'm hopeful of some of the Japanese companies releasing new-model vehicles without all of the extra electronic baloney, but that's a problem for another day.
Closest thing you'll get to that is an MX-5. Their stringent weight philosophy doesn't allow for much electronics. I have a '19 club and it weighs ~2350 lbs. Which is like the weight of the wiring harnesses alone of a Tesla. The MX-5/Miata is about as bare bones as it gets for a newer legal vehicle.
Interesting idea, this bears looking into.
Oh, as a potential role model, I definitely advocate for it. Ive owned corvettes, a WRX, GTO, Trans Am, and driven far more powerful and much more expensive cars and believe it or not, it's by FAR my favorite. Between the driving characteristics, drop top joy, stereo and relative privacy, not to mention the absurdly low price of entry, I personally call it the perfect car. And if you are unsure of that stamp of approval, "Miata is always the answer" is a well known phrase amongst gearheads.
Edit: oh yeah... It's also reliable and fuel efficient.
Got a '97 and yeah, nothing beats it if you're someone who loves to drive for driving's sake. Analog instrumentation, no screens, no "click here" buttons, no auto removed making decisions for me, no cameras or microphones or recording devices. It does have a rudimentary "cruise control" - probably a bad omen for things to come - but it only tries to maintain your speed, it doesn't try to match the speed of the car in front of you or otherwise encourage distracted driving.
The other vehicle I have is a 2005 Wrangler, nearly as analog as the Miata. I can't imagine getting rid of either in favor of an oversized, rolling surveillance computer.
Lmao! My other vehicle is an '11 Wrangler! Please tell me both are manual?
Of course! Miata is a 5-speed, Jeep is a 6-speed. I can't imagine driving a Miata w/o a shifter. Pure heresy that would be. If you're on FB you might like the "Manual Elitist Jerks" group.
I'm not on FB anymore but that does sound right up my alley. When I was on FB I was in the Manual preservation society. Yeah my ND is a 6 sp and that transmission is perfect. Buttery smooth, clutch only takes like 1/2" to engage, I really can't say enough about that car.
TBH, I'm glad to see so many on the road now that I'm seeing fewer MGBs. The Miata's a worthy successor to foreign-auto roadster: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MG_MGB
I used to see tons of Bs still on the road in Florida back in the 80s. I liked the looks but preferred the TR-6. Spitfires were nice looking too. Dream car would have been an E-type but that was going to have to wait until I became rich & famous. Still haven't got one! :-(
Oh yeah, the TR-6's are spiffy AF. It's not too late to open a dental practice if you want an E-type though :p
Squarebodys were selling for insane prices during COVID but not so much now. I have been wanting to unload my ~~burden~~ K10 shortbed project truck since I'm over it, it just sits in my garage, and I bought a different truck (which is actually road worthy!) but it's not the right time to sell because I'd be probably losing a couple grand on the deal.
They're handsome trucks, you should find a buyer eventually. What did you snag as a daily driver instead though?
It's not my daily (that's an econobox commuter car) but "the burden" is a 76 K10 and the new one is a 2007 Silverado Classic (cat eye) regular cab shortbed 4x4. One is basically the great great grandson of the other.
Solid pick, she'll treat you right.
I think that it was BMW or Jaguar that proposed a subscription-based seat heating option? I don't know where these people get their ideas, it's just wild.
BMW
I wanted to build my own module that would let me query and inject codes into my cars CAN bus and replace onstar with that. Short version of this is that GM says no, you cant use the car in a way that doesnt generate profit for us.
I've been saying it for years, starting with those idiotic voice activated "smart" speakers from Google or Amazon in people's homes. Nobody pays attention to what's happening behind the scenes, even when the press breaks a story about some unsavoury bullshit (https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-47893082) like "voice recordings are occasionally reviewed to improve speech recognition but the reaction to the Bloomberg article suggests many customers are unaware that humans may be listening." That's you, that's you and your GF/wife talking about your work (possibly including restricted information), friends and family, politics, or about how you're trying to work on getting your entire hand to fit inside of her. The thought that these same companies would design and furnish technology for vehicles without engaging in the same kind of stuff is absurd.
Too few people know, fewer care if you bother to tell them about it. They'd be aghast to know that what they had bought and installed in their living room/dining room/den/bedroom/bathroom is essentially a voluntary bug, yet telling them that the cops could subpoena the companies in question to excise the unit's data and review everything they've been saying in the privacy of their vehicle over a relevant (or maybe not-so-relevant) period of time pursuant to an investigation usually will get you idiotic comments about how "if you're not doing anything wrong, you have nothing to worry about."
The content in question can at the very least affect their insurance, at worst be used as a honeypot by people seeking to exert influence via blackmail, or extort the person in question. The end-user risk is the same as that described concerning their use in households. Just think about all of the "uncomfortable conversations" or sex that you've had in your/someone else's car over the decades - ask yourself if you'd want an open mic sitting there, which may or may not be later reviewed by persons unknown. This is the kind of information which may become available to cops, and worse yet, they don't always need warrants. There's been a pervasive culture of simply leaning into those unwilling to turn it over, in the kind of theme seen in recent years with doorbell cams. I can't imagine that they wouldn't pull the same routine with a vehicle's computer data, whether or not it involves cameras/mics.
Captain obvious has entered the chat.
They already track your license plate using car and stop light mounted cameras…
No fucking shit. Preaching to the choir for the most part here on Lemmy I assume, but if you do not understand that every new technology will eventually be used against you by the state, then you are missing a central part of the relationship between technology and the state