this post was submitted on 03 May 2025
134 points (99.3% liked)

Ask Lemmy

31407 readers
1202 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For me: Cancelling paid subscriptions should be as easy as subscribing. I hate the fact that they actively hide the unsubscribe option or that you sometimes should have to write an e-mail if you want to unsubscribe.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 1 points 5 minutes ago

For subscriptions, I highly recommend using disposable cards like Privacy.com (no affiliation, just a customer). If I want to try out Prime, or Starz, or a "free until..." promotional offer, I just spin up a card. It's connected to my bank account, locked to that single merchant, and they can't charge more than whatever spending limit I put on that card. Honestly, I don't always even sign in to a service to cancel, it's much easier to just pause or delete a card, and then they can't charge you anymore. It's free for us because they collect a small portion of the transaction amount (like Visa, PayPal, etc)...

[–] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 4 points 1 hour ago

A free trial automatically rolling into a paid subscription.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Shooting plainclothes cops that execute a no-knock warrant on your home.

Seriously.

All states--ALL states--have a castle doctrine that allows you to use lethal defense to protect yourself inside your home. A no-knock warrant being executed by cops out of uniform means that you have a reasonable belief that your home is being invaded, and that your life is at immediate risk. Now, admittedly, you probably aren't going to survive that exchange of gunfire. But the state is going to have a really hard time charging you with shooting at/killing a cop if you do.

[–] BeardedBlaze@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

About dozen States do NOT have a castle doctrine, and have duty to retreat laws instead.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 1 points 6 minutes ago

No, castle doctrine exists in all states. You do not have a duty to retreat when it's inside your own home in almost all cases.

[–] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

police being able to lie to you

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago

I think in the eu we have some legislation about it. I have the feeling of reading about a law like that before. Subscription buttons needing to be as clear as unsubscribe.

[–] squid_slime@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago
[–] PartyAt15thAndSummit@lemmy.zip 19 points 9 hours ago

Dating sites besieging their users with bots and fake profiles.

[–] camelbeard@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago

I don't know how this works in the US, but where I live after a year subscription (let's say for your internet provider or something). They can only renew per month. So if the year subscription is over you can cancel any service every month and they can't hit you with any fees.

Back in the day if you'd forgot to cancel your plan you'd be stuck with them for another year. It sucked!

[–] Overshoot2648@lemm.ee 26 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The FTC under Biden was actually craking down on that. It was called the "Click to Cancel" rule, but that was literally a month before the election. :/

[–] CH3DD4R_G0BL1N@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 hours ago

Lina Khan was a perhaps once in a lifetime bureaucrat doing good for the people at a rapid pace on normal government timelines and now she’ll probably never get that job or a better one again.

[–] KombatWombat@lemmy.world 20 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

In the US, unsubscribing from email spam is legally required to be easy under the CAN-SPAM act. For paid subscription services, I believe they also are required to be as easy to leave as they are to join in the EU and California.

Somewhat related, many dark patterns are treated like fraud.

[–] TheRealKuni@midwest.social 1 points 2 hours ago

the CAN-SPAM act

I once wrote a community college paper for my friend in exchange for some work on my car. He had to write a paper on the CAN-SPAM act.

I did the assignment, covered all the requirements, explained it and whatnot. I then wrote a SECOND paper, appended to the end of the first. This second paper also met the length requirements, but was a parody. About the Hormel meat product, Spam. In cans. Can-Spam. I was very proud of it. It was funny.

I kept asking my friend if he ever got feedback from the professor. He never did. It was then that I learned professors often don’t read papers like this, they just assign them to get students to read and practice writing. It made me sad.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 41 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Loaning money to your own political campaign and then paying yourself back, including an interest rate set by you, using donor funds.

[–] higgsboson@dubvee.org 10 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

There are a number of things that are legal here in the US, which would count as corruption in other places.

[–] johncandy1812@lemmy.ca 29 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Companies changing the terms of the contract on you.

[–] Wiz@midwest.social 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, but - in many of those contracts (particularly end-user license agreements) you agreed to them changing the terms of the contract. You also have an "out" - not using the product any more.

You're right though: it's slimy. Anything slimy thing can be put into a contract!

Source: I'm not a lawyer, but worked in an office with a lot of them, and worked with software license agreements in particular.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I'm so curious now. Do you know how those apply? I mean, can they change the terms on you without notice or is that notice legally required? And say they want to feed all your data of however many years to AI. If you accidentally use it once, do they get permission for everything? What if you agree only because you want to delete your data?

I have so many questions. lol

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

You usually get an email saying something is changing. Problem is, you've already paid and if it's a material change, now you have to agree to continue using your property. Sometimes you don't get a notice and it's a "software update" that now pushes ads onto a product you bought and are now shit outta luck since you can't return it. Samsung and Roku are bad for this.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

Samsung and Roku are bad for this.

You're buying the hardware; they provide the software as a service. Oh, sure, no agreeing to a unilateral change of conditions on the software means that your hardware is rendered worthless, but still... And yeah, that's pretty much the way that actually works.

IP law can start getting pretty strange.

[–] hnnhmn7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

all i’m going to say is whatever shit adobe is pulling because i could yap about this forever with anyone

[–] Baggie@lemmy.zip 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Which particular part? I'm interested and somewhat outside of the situation.

[–] hnnhmn7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 12 hours ago

the fact that they decided to charge $90 a month and $65 to cancel is truly evil

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 34 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Any type of exit fee like account closing. Any costs for leaving should be charges before leaving as part of business costs either at the start or part of monthly or whatever. Leaving should be free.

[–] Elaine@lemm.ee 3 points 3 hours ago

Looking at you, Adobe.

[–] libra00@lemmy.world 71 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Advertising. At what point did we as a society decide that it was perfectly acceptable for companies to manipulate us - especially children - into buying shit we don't need and didn't even want until the ad sold us on it? It's fucking wild.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Marketing wasn’t really a thing until sometime around the Industrial Revolution and post-WW1. Before then, we didn’t really have the capacity to produce more than what people needed. Marketing basically just consisted of “here’s my product, here’s why it’s superior to others.” But with the post-war boom and the rise in manufacturing, producers were suddenly able to out-produce the demand. So they invented marketing, to get people to buy things that they didn’t actually need. The idea of “create a problem so you can sell the solution” was born.

[–] DirigibleProtein@aussie.zone 24 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Adblocking feels to me like it should be illegal, but isn’t. I have adblockers on all my devices and haven’t seen an ad for years; it feels like a secret super power and stopped the web from looking like a trashy back alley.

[–] harsh3466@lemmy.ml 32 points 23 hours ago (6 children)

I am always shocked when I have to use a browser without an ad blocker. How do people tolerate it?

I mean, I get it. I know many people have no idea about adblocking, etc. But goddam. It's so awful without it.

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

You should rawdog fox news sometime. Their cookie pop-up is WILD

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 38 points 22 hours ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Kookie215@lemmy.world 94 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Corporations that don't pay taxes being allowed to make millions in profit while their employees qualify for welfare because they pay them so little.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] libra00@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago (8 children)

EULAs that say 'using this indicates your acceptance of these terms'. Seems like it ought to be illegal but it's super common.

[–] Capricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Surprisingly a lot of clauses in EULAS are and get "stricken" (even though this one still stands).

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] hedgehogging_the_bed@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Biden administration was working on making that unsubscribe bullshit illegal last year. But then Trump so those tactics will probably be mandatory pretty soon...

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Tiptopit@feddit.org 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Leaving a supermarket without buying anything

[–] SmokingCookie@lemmy.world 18 points 22 hours ago

That largely depends on what you take with you as you leave.

load more comments
view more: next ›