this post was submitted on 04 May 2025
17 points (77.4% liked)

Canada

9662 readers
912 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s not the rage at all. A minority of misinformed people in Alberta and an even smaller percentage in BC and Saskatchewan are back on their hoser soapboxes.

The people against it are very against it. But whatever, it’s not going to happen without violence, as most of the lands don’t belong to the provinces, it’s mostly treaty or crown, and it triggers some very high feelings.

[–] toastmeister@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The way I see it orchestrated by Trump is if the tariffs stay on manufacturing many provinces will be wiped out. Carney will then provide a bailout using funds from Alberta, whose exports will increase due to a devalued Canadian dollar and a 2.5x lower tariff on their higher margin product.

[–] BinzyBoi@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Share this in the Wild West Canada community.

Bro who mods that space really needs to read this... assuming he'll even listen.

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago

assuming he'll even listen.

Narrator:

He won't.....

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

I would except I have it blocked. It’s basically one person spouting nonsense.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago

An independent Alberta seems unlikely - I suspect our neighbours to the south would quickly intervene to "liberate" an oil rich region at the first possible excuse. At that point, it would end up as a US territory, like the article suggests.

Smith's fuckery seems like poorly considered pandering at the best of times, but with Trump at the head of the US military it's gonna have nasty consequences.

[–] jaemo@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Not a single person in any of my peers groups, even those who are only considered "well wishers", considers this "the rage".

"The rage", for me at least, is imagining holding these traitors heads under the water in a beautiful creek running through a meadow on a sunny day, until the bubbles stop.