this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
805 points (99.1% liked)

Uplifting News

14885 readers
1929 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I don't get why a such law took so long, but late is better than never.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 20 minutes ago
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 1 points 20 minutes ago

What? No wonder the Missouri Oblast is fucked up.

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I mean... this is reason to celebrate, but at the same time it's like saying you're giving up on blinding orphan puppies. You were doing what?

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 14 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 11 points 3 hours ago

Watch the Republicans set their hair on fire in response while introducing legislation to allow more child workers as well.

The party of family values.

[–] 96VXb9ktTjFnRi@feddit.nl 6 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

Studying the Child marriage in the United States Wikipedia page. Looking at the map legenda that says 'red = 0', thinking 'surely that means it's forbidden, right? right??' What the fuck.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 6 points 3 hours ago

In California, for instance, the general marriage age is 18, but children may be married with parental consent and judicial approval with no minimum age limit.[53

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

The fact that so many states allow marriage at 16 is concerning. 🫤

[–] L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

Inb4 reference frame based age adjustments become the next red ticket item.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 19 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] 96VXb9ktTjFnRi@feddit.nl 17 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Old enough to marry but too young to divorce. That's the stupidest thing I've heard this week.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 1 points 37 minutes ago

That’s the point - the power imbalance. Marry off young girls to men who can groom and control them. Daddy-husbands and child-wives. The Christian complementarian model sees women as essentially children anyway. Like Moon’s comment implies - if they marry you off at 12, you are never getting the independence to escape.

At least Tennessee Representative John Rose waited until the teenager he met judging a FFA competition was 18.

[–] muusemuuse@lemm.ee 20 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

You mean they hadn't already?!

[–] scoobford@lemmy.zip 12 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

It's legal in a lot of the US, yes. Sometimes it requires approval from a judge, 4 states have no minimum age at all.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_marriage_in_the_United_States

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

The fact that California is one of those 4 is fucking mind blowing. They banned smoking and legalized weed but can't be bothered to stop child brides from happening????

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I thought US was a 1st world country...

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The actual 1st world thinks differently. 😒

[–] AntAcid@lemm.ee 1 points 15 minutes ago

Singing shit from the darkness is hilarious. Let us know your country so we can laugh at your garbage culture.

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 11 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

This is PROOF that America is On the DECLINE! We NEED MORE God in School's to REVERSE this COMMUNIST FILTH of OUTLAWING MARRYING CHILDREN! First THIS then what? We CANT have SEX with them?

-School Shooting Advocates AKA Conservatives!

[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Missouri of all places!

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 28 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

The next time someone makes fun of shithole countries remind them that hundreds of 12yo are married in the US every year. And I guess their little bodies are ready for motherhood because many of them produce a baby in 4 or 6 mo after the wedding.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 11 points 7 hours ago

many of them produce a baby in 4 or 6 mo after the wedding

Wow, they are just precocious in every way, aren’t they?

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 10 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The usual shit that islamophobes would say is that 'at least they aren't 9' even if many Islamic countries ban that shit and large age gaps in marriage (Egypt is one example) and many children marriages that do happen are between children. As in, an 11 year old girl is betrothed to a 14 year old boy (still not cool though). They also ignore that in many cases a man who does marry a little kid is often socially ostracized and treated like shit for doing that.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Western Chauvinism and Islamophobia have red-pilled so many promising minds into the intellectual sewer of bigotry.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

Have they? Islam isn't exactly pure and innocent in its own, though. Some of its reputation is rightfully earned through oppression and violence.

[–] beejboytyson@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

The biggest red piller is Muslim....

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Trump will absolutely flip over this. Hell, the entire Republican party will go on strike.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] HereIAm@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

I would rather you guys lower the drinking age to 18...

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 20 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Finally. The bare fucking minimum.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago

It's Missouri, it's a miracle this happened.

[–] gaja@lemm.ee 65 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Rep. Hardy Billington, R-Poplar Bluff, was among the few who spoke against the bill, arguing that barring pregnant teenagers from getting married would increase abortion rates.

“We all claim to be pro-life here in the body,” Billington said. “Now we’re going to vote on this bill where babies are going to die.”

Disgusting. What a pitiful excuse to enable the trafficking of children. I'm ashamed to live here. There's no fucking guarantee that it would even increase abortion rate, this guy is a closeted pedophile looking out for his ilk.

Apparently he's been spouting this bullshit for at least the past year. Not to mention he's also a homophobe.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 33 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (3 children)

Sounds like an old guy from the 50s, who still clings to 50s social mores and stigmas, unaware that being a single mother isn't the massive taboo he remembers it being.

Checks Hardy Billington's Wikipedia page

Born 1952 or 1953 (age 71–72)

Aaaaaand there we have it. Not sure why his exact birthdate isn't known. In fact the only notable thing on that page is about him expressing opposition to another child marriage bill that was proposed last year. Imagine having "strongly endorses child marriage" as the one and only legacy from your 70+ years of life. Gross.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

That's a good take. The generational difference is real, that good old shotgun wedding from the past.

[–] gaja@lemm.ee 12 points 11 hours ago

It's okay because there's an R next to his name. It wouldn't shock me if people were fully aware of his views. The abortion argument works for women here and the men here were sold at "child marriage."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 8 hours ago

https://calmatters.org/politics/2023/06/child-marriage-california/

Just gotta say, fuck the ACLU for both getting hate speech declared free speech and opposing a man on child marriage.

[–] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

uhhhh why wasnt this done in the 1800s???

[–] sibannac@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago

Missouri wanted slavery in the 1800s at its conception.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments
view more: next ›