Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
Both Firefox AND Brave have made questionable decisions>
Yes, but is incredibly disingenuous to equate those mistakes as the same. Firefox has never installed shit on a users computer without consent from the user. Brave has - you know, the same way malware would.
Even though I don't use chromium-based web browsers because of its monopoly, it would be nice if we could integrate brave shields into ungoogled chromium so people wouldn't have to deal with all bloat and surprises from Brave
Brave is such a pain, always adding features nobody wants, trying everything they can to get a penny out of their users.
Firefox- yeah Mozilla is making questionable decisions. But it's the best we have.
No, after Brave installed a service level running VPN without my consent, and continued to reinstall it silently every background update even after removal, it's a bad browser. That's what malware does.
Comparing two companies with poor track records doesn't make them good companies when compared to each other.
Just pasting more info for those that were concerned, like me:
Issue. This was rolled back and only seemed to affect Windows.
(I don't use Brave as a daily driver, but it's my Chromium browser of choice when I need assess if a website is really broken, or if it's just misbehaving on Firefox.)
The issue with this is that it's a part of an overall picture - that Brave sees nothing wrong with violating users' boundaries. Brave 100% needs forks that would disable or remove weird non-consensual things added silently in updates, like what Librewolf is to Firefox, except Brave imo pushes the boundaries even more.
There was a fork, from students which got silenced with legal letters because they named the fork Braver-Browser and its a copyright to copy the name.
If you are using Windows, double-check your services.msc to ensure that the VPN was disabled/removed. After I got tired of fighting, I uninstalled Brave and the uninstaller did not remove the VPN service. So I have my doubts the patch would remove it.
What's the name of the program I'm looking for?
I don't think I've had their VPN installed (I use FF, Librewolf and Mullvad 99.99% of the time), but I do have Brave installed as a 4th option and have only used it a few times, so I'd like to make sure their VPN wasn't installed at some point.
In Services, I only see three Brave entries. Two are for keeping it up to date, and the other provides elevated privileges.
Thanks
It was a few years back that I dumped Brave and had to perform the surgery to remove the service manually. I can't remember the name exactly, but this article says "Brave VPN Service" and "Brave VPN Wireguard Service". You sound like you don't have it installed.
but librewolf is king
librewolf & tor browser combo is solid
Can't argue with that.
It's pretty fair to dunk on Brave because it's Chromium. I don't want the biggest ad company in the world having the monopoly on how we see the Internet, and Brave perpetuates that.
Right? Why doesn't everybody see how obviously powerful it is to be THE main browser engine and thus how every single Chromium installation and further usage solidify the position of dominance, and thus to dictate the future of the Web (no less!) that it gives to a gigantic corporation? A corporation so big it is at risk of being split in pieces as it was ruled just literally weeks ago that Google had formed an illegal monopoly in its ad business?
Come on people, don't be fucking naive of course it's bad! Of course we SHOULD dunk on Brave and every other browsers doing the same!
firefox at minimum clears the very low bar of not exposing casual user to crypto
People miss the fact that we can tell when one of them make a questionable decision which is what matters the most.
Just remember that Mozilla is a seperate entity to Firefox.
Yes it is a maxi pad absorbing all that Google money to ensure that firefox developers don't do anything Google doesn't like
Classic parasite Behavior
and nor
warning syntax error