this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
323 points (93.1% liked)

Memes

50230 readers
797 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Its like the billionaires pass the ball from Elon to bill so Elon can go back to the bench and take a break and get some Gatorade.

[–] kevin2107@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Bill gates is an actual scumbag but yeah none of you have ever met him so how would you know

[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 30 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

The only road to being a billionaire is through exploitation. If you aren’t willing to sacrifice your morals somewhere along the path to get there, your journey to being a billionaire ends. Like it or not, that’s the reality. Gates is no better than the others. He just has better PR. There’s more to being a good member of humanity than giving away money for the tax breaks and PR. Working class folks defending billionaires in 2025 is some goldfish brain type shit.

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

He isnt doing it for the tax break… like think about that logically if he normally spends 10m a year then he pays taxes on that 10m if he sells 100B of stock and donates it he doesn’t have to pay taxes on the amount he donates but still is out the 100B.

There are degrees of evil, a person who spits on a person is not as bad as someone who kills a person. A billionaire who feels bad as he ages and tries to give that money to charity is not as bad as someone using that money to fund Nazi groups.

Like I am not saying spitting on people is okay but to lump someone who spits on people with someone who kills a persons as “no better than the others” is wrong and if anything we should be encouraging more billionaires to donate their money as it’s at least better than them hoarding it

[–] wuphysics87@lemmy.ml 3 points 14 hours ago

He's developed this Mr. Rogers persona

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

That's called being a class traitor.

[–] damdy@lemm.ee 0 points 10 hours ago

I want to like Bill Gates, you're probably right about PR. Even though I use Linux I still think he's been a positive for humanity.

[–] pemptago@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bill Gates the farmer?

Just trying to find a decent link led me past so many deceptive headlines like Bill Gates owns a lot of American farmland, but not the majority.

So... he's the largest private owner of US farmland , but he doesn't own a majority-- What a relief /s

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago

Wow that AP article is insanely deceptive. They make a fact look like a conspiracy theory and then "debunk" it with a strawman.

[–] SmackemWittadic@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Anyone with billions of dollars or even multi millions who isn't using most of the amount to aid humanity is an asshole, regardless of what their political views are

[–] vfreire85@lemmy.ml 12 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

billionaires shouldn't exist in the first place. there's no way such amount of resources is going to efficiently be used by one single person.

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Batman enters the chat....

[–] wolfinthewoods@lemmy.ml 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

And Batman doesn't exist, so the quote still checks out. But, if he did, he shouldn't either. Absolute Batman has a great take on Batman as a poor, working-class person. I think Batman works better as that. Batman inherently is problematic, as a billionaire playboy beating up mentally-ill people. (This coming from a Batman fan myself).

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 1 points 6 hours ago

What you're telling me that liberal propaganda is liberal?

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 63 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Throughout the 90s Microsoft was the company equivalent of a serial killer, so Gates had to really step up his public relations. Goldfish-brained liberal techies ate it up, and love him now.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Many are new blood having no idea what Microsoft used to be. Add to that the modern good-guy MS face, funding (usefu for theml) open source and all that, and it gets difficult to convey how things used to be.

[–] Commiunism@beehaw.org 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I love how the conversation went from "all billionaires are bad eat the rich!!" to "hey this good billionaire is talking smack about a bad billionaire, time to defend them from criticism because they did good thing"

[–] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 4 points 14 hours ago

that's liberals for ya

[–] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Bill Gates? The Epstein guy?

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 31 points 1 day ago

An Epstein guy.

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 day ago

Now to be fair, they're both Epstein guys.

[–] ChickenAndRice@sh.itjust.works 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Pretty much all of Reddit right now

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Kind of surprised that Lemmy fell for it too.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Fell for what? From all publicly available information, Bill Gates is an objectively better person that is putting his money to far better good than Elon and is an example of how billionaires should behave.

Does that mean that he's overall a net "good" person in the grand, karmic, life total sense? Hard to say, given the abuse that Microsoft perpetuated to become Microsoft, probably not, but that doesn't change any of the first part.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 38 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (19 children)

Bill Gates is one of those secret elite Epstein list pedophile Zuckerberg-lizard people ruining and draining the planet. Gates wife divorced him for his Epstein escapades.

Running a big pharma company disguised as a charity and using his money to influence the WHO and WEF.

Elon Musk is a neo Nazi idiot who is too stupid to keep their schemes going and canceled USAID.

In terms of human casualties Elon is a lot lower than Gates. Because Bill Gates is competently evil.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (4 children)

☝️Case in point, LOL.

It isn't hard at all to say whether Bill Gates is an "overall net 'good' person" or not. He became a billionaire (which is an inherently exploitative act), and no amount of trying to whitewash his legacy with philanthropy after the fact can change that.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 day ago (7 children)
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Billionaire philanthropy is like doing 100 damage to humanity, then returning 5 health. Then the 5 health gets amplified by information channels and it gets to feel much bigger in the collective consciousness. It gets a further boost when there's other prominent billionaires that don't give any hp back making it stand out as the good guy. So you end up in a bizarre position where objectively the philanthropist is the good guy compared to the rest, but the vast majority of us have no hp left.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As if one of them isn't a piece of shit?

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

All billionaires are shit, but Gates is only an elephants diarrhoea, whereas musk is the sick triceratops' shitmound from Jurassic Park.

load more comments
view more: next ›