this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
1093 points (97.0% liked)

Lemmy Be Wholesome

8699 readers
109 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Be Wholesome. This is the polar opposite of LemmeShitpost. Here you can post wholesome memes, palate cleanser and good vibes.

The home to heal your soul. No bleak-posting!

Rules:


1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. No NSFW Content


-Content shouldn't be NSFW

-Refrain from posting triggering content, if the content might be triggering try putting it behind NSFW tags.


7. Content should be Wholesome, we accept cute cats, kittens, puppies, dogs and anything, everything that restores your faith in humanity!


Content that isn't wholesome will be removed.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Mildly Infuriating

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Jokes

7.Credible Defense

...

Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tracaine@lemmy.world 22 points 5 days ago

Are there better, more efficient ways to accomplish this? Yes. Am I glad they at least did something though? Also yes.

[–] poloqualle@feddit.org 19 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Americans will build literal shoeboxes instead of 1 apartment building

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

When dealing with homeless and mentally ill this setup of isolation from other units is better. Dealing with unsanitary living, smells, fires, sounds, are all are easier to mitigate in this setup. Also America is not hurting for wide open spaces to build this type of thing.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 days ago

Nor is Canada, where this is.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 47 points 6 days ago

Yo

Idea

What if ALL the houses we build are for reducing homelessness?

At least think about it

[–] GiveOver@feddit.uk 80 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (6 children)

Here's a decent article

There's a lot of negativity from armchair experts in this thread but this seems like a genuine case of somebody putting a lot of thought and a lot of effort into actually helping the homeless. It's not just dropping a bunch of tiny houses and saying "job done".

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 23 points 6 days ago (2 children)

It's deadass exhausting seeing people whinge whenever anything that improves the world happens. Always enough time for criticism, never enough to do something anywhere near as positive IRL.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 9 points 6 days ago

It's hard not to be jaded. I bounce between both sides constantly.

Either way, this guy did an incredible thing.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] slappypantsgo@lemm.ee 44 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Just want to remind everyone that we don’t have a housing shortage, we have a cost of living crisis. Everyone deserves a place to live and we have plenty. The will is the only thing. Fight YIMBY traitors. We can do it!

[–] Aux@feddit.uk 13 points 6 days ago (6 children)

Not sure what you're talking about, but here in the UK we need over 4m houses to be built to house the current population. That's quite a lot for a country of 68m.

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Two things can be wrong. We can (and should) dispose of landlords and build more housing.

[–] slappypantsgo@lemm.ee 1 points 18 hours ago

Traitor YIMBYs want to build more market rate housing. Unnecessary. If after controlling costs there is an actual demand for housing, we should build government housing. Absolutely.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

"YIMBY traitor" -- isn't that just a NIMBY?

[–] slappypantsgo@lemm.ee 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

YIMBY traitors typically call decent folks NIMBYs, so I’m never keen on using that term.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Matombo@feddit.org 14 points 5 days ago (3 children)

is it just me or anyone else thinking that row houses would have been way more efficent than these? giving everyone living there more than 1 room

[–] Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Depends. Given this happened in North America there might very well be existing production lines for these tiny houses, and construction laws are also way simpler to fulfill with those basically anywhere (e.g. in Germany you'd just have had to make the whole place a camping site). They all look pretty standardized, including those solar panels.

Although I'd agree that a properly build big building would probably last longer. Not too sure about that though, I'm just happy to hear there are still people with money actually taking care of those who're at rock bottom.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Robotsandstuff@lemmy.world 31 points 6 days ago (2 children)

So this guy shouldn't be news, this should be the standard, it's scary that the one good guy with enough money to do something like this is the exception and not the norm.

We all evolved to live in tribes; we have to work together as people.

[–] MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago

That's why we elected people to help the community with our collected funds. To help govern the distribution of the community effort. Well, that was the idea.

[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

The problem is that we allow individuals to amass so much wealth, it inevitably leads to the rest of us being at their mercy like that. If we're lucky, they'll be sorta benevolent, like this person. Would be much easier if we took out the randomness and just had the funds to do necessary stuff like this collectively.

[–] Doctor_Satan@lemm.ee 27 points 5 days ago (2 children)

You might be interested in the story of Tengelo Park.

Harris Rosen went from a childhood in a rough New York City neighborhood to becoming a millionaire whose company owns seven hotels in Orlando, but his self-made success is not his proudest achievement.

Twenty years ago, the Orlando, Fla. neighborhood of Tangelo Park was a crime-infested place where people were afraid to walk down the street. The graduation rate at the local high school was 25 percent. Having amassed a fortune from his success in the hotel business, Rosen decided Tangelo Park needed some hospitality of its own.

“Hospitality really is appreciating a fellow human being,” Rosen told Gabe Gutierrez in a segment that aired on TODAY Wednesday. “I came to the realization that I really had to now say, ‘Thank you.’’’

Rosen, 73, began his philanthropic efforts by paying for day care for parents in Tangelo Park, a community of about 3,000 people. When those children reached high school, he created a scholarship program in which he offered to pay free tuition to Florida state colleges for any students in the neighborhood.

In the two decades since starting the programs, Rosen has donated nearly $10 million, and the results have been remarkable. The high school graduation rate is now nearly 100 percent, and some property values have quadrupled. The crime rate has been cut in half, according to a study by the University of Central Florida.

"We've given them hope,’’ Rosen said. “We've given these kids hope, and given the families hope. And hope is an amazing thing."

[–] tty5@lemmy.world 23 points 5 days ago (2 children)

10M over 20 years to help a community of 3000 or $166 per person per year. USA is planning to increase the military budget by 150B this year or over $400 per US citIzen...

[–] Doctor_Satan@lemm.ee 6 points 5 days ago

Yeah I was shocked by the math on that one too. It is ridiculously cheap to lower crime and poverty, while increasing graduation rates and college enrollment. It's almost like keeping people poor and stupid and criminal is intentional.

[–] Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 days ago (3 children)

You're saying that as if investment into military was unnecessary these days

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Who would have thought that the way to reduce crime was to reduce people's need to commit crimes by giving them homes and a future.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago

Bruce Wayne but sane

[–] Sergio@slrpnk.net 59 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Good for him, but this is pretty much an Orphan-Crushing Machine moment.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 35 points 6 days ago (1 children)

And why were they homeless?

Why were they homeless???

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 33 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm of two minds.

  • shitty bungalows are what is killing infrastructure costs and perpetuating urban sprawl. We have a generous home in a hyper-dense housing area and - thanks to triple paned windows and concrete - no claustrophobia.

  • tiny homes for people returning from homelessness may be a good idea. The unfair concerns are mitigated by very repairable units separated from neighbours.

We need to keep these as transitional housing, though, and a feeder into a "starter" unit in proper dense mixed-use: every block (hectare) taken for tiny homes is 3 million cubic meters of space taken from a land budget we're already overdrawn on.

[–] blackfire@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I think thats always the hope that they are first steps of stability to move up. None of the projects like this I've seen have been intended to be life time residence.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Allero@lemmy.today 20 points 6 days ago

Nice!

Now, it would be good not to rely on good will of some individuals and actually enforce this for all the rich.

But still mad respect for the man.

[–] Busyvar@jlai.lu 16 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Fight against homelessness shall not be charity driven.

[–] Liberteez@lemm.ee 17 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Yes but this is still a good idea in the meantime

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 10 points 6 days ago

How good it is depends on the details, of course.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 18 points 6 days ago

I like this because it is both a good story about an individual helping their community and it is proof individual action alone is not enough to rely on to solve social problems.

[–] StonerCowboy@lemm.ee 17 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Now imagine if billionaires did it with their infinite wealth......sad. humanity and capitalism is just cancer.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

This is my most common fantasy if I somehow came into a billion dollars.

It's a fantasy, but I would create an apartment complex with mixed 1 2 and 3 bedrooms and set the rent below market value and then find a lawyer to draw up a legal document to turn it into a co-op so that after enough people moved in I could turn control over to them.

If I were a multibillionaire I would do this again and again until non market housing was normal In my city, and anyone wanting to build housing has to compete with a bunch of non market housing.

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Someone took 99 families off the streets? Wow fuck that asshole, how dare she have enough money to do that. How dare she not give up her home and make it 100 families off the streets, not good enough!

-Half this website, angry 99 families now have a place to live who didn't before this event

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 days ago

The anger isn't (necessarily) for the rich person who housed people. It's for the system who left people homeless in the first place, the system that will put those people back on the streets if they don't pay rent/property taxes/whatever other fee people have to pay to exist, the system where the solution is literally just "have rich people pay their share and almost everything will be fixed" but for some reason the people in charge can't (or don't want to) figure that out.

You conflating anger with the system with anger for people getting houses is disingenuous.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

that sounds an awful lot like communism to me. We can't have that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›