this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
340 points (98.9% liked)

Progressive Politics

2600 readers
213 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://50501.chat/post/206911

First, Trump issued an executive order to militarize domestic law enforcement. Now a new order has come out. Buried in Project Homecoming, the executive order just released by the White House, is the single most dangerous shift in American civil liberties in a generation.

The same man who empowered ICE with military-grade surveillance, armored vehicles, and counterterror tools is now pushing the legal justification to detain people indefinitely.

The administration is laying the legal groundwork to suspend habeas corpus, the constitutional right that protects people from being detained without trial. It’s the right to not be disappeared. It’s the foundation of due process. And they’re getting ready to tear it away.

How? They’re invoking the Suspension Clause of the Constitution, which only allows habeas to be revoked “in cases of rebellion or invasion.” Stephen Miller and the Trump legal machine are now planning to label undocumented immigration as an “invasion,” which would let them bypass courts and jail people without charges, trials, or legal representation. The administration is trying to reclassify undocumented immigration as an invasion to unlock those powers. That’s the strategy.

Let that sink in. They’re preparing to create a class of people who can be detained indefinitely without ever seeing a judge.

Ask yourselves, If anyone can just be disappeared off the streets without charges, without court appearances, without access to a lawyer then do we still have a democracy?

This is just the beginning, it won’t stop at immigrants. So let’s be clear about what this will look like.

Indefinite detention. No due process. No hearings. No legal protections. We’ve seen this playbook before in history—and it always starts with creating a legal exception for a specific group. In this case, it’s undocumented immigrants. But legal exceptions do not stay contained. Once the precedent is set, it expands. Always.

Ask yourself: who defines what an “invasion” is? Who decides who qualifies as a threat? Protesters? Activists? Whistleblowers? Once the right to challenge detention is suspended for one group, the door opens to expand it. That is how authoritarianism consolidates power.

While they call this “restoring order,” here’s what they’re really doing:

They’re tearing $96.7 billion out of the economy. That’s how much undocumented immigrants contributed in taxes in 2022, Specifically:

• $59.4 billion in federal taxes

• $37.3 billion in state and local taxes

• $33.9 billion toward social insurance programs they are banned from accessing

Again, these are people paying into Social Security, Medicare, and public infrastructure they’re not even allowed to use.

The source? The Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy. Read it yourself. https://itep.org/undocumented-immigrants-taxes-2024/

California alone would lose $8.47 billion in annual tax revenue if these mass deportations succeed. Texas would lose $4.87 billion. New York? $3.1 billion. Every state would feel the economic gut punch. And don’t forget: these are programs undocumented workers pay into but cannot use. They’re helping hold up a system that offers them nothing in return.

Now ask yourself: who is going to make up that lost revenue?

You. The poor. The working class. Not the rich, who continue to dodge taxes with impunity.

The federal government has already slashed funding to the states. Wealthy elites are sitting on tax loopholes and lower effective rates than working people. The answer is obvious: the working class will be left to cover the difference. Your rent, your healthcare, your school funding—all of it will take the hit.

What we are watching is economic sabotage wrapped in xenophobic theater. It is designed to scapegoat immigrants, distract from billionaire tax breaks, and destroy civil liberties in the process.

We have reached a dangerous tipping point. A government openly discussing the suspension of habeas corpus is a government no longer pretending to be democratic.

Habeas corpus is the line between freedom and fascism.

If we let this fall, there is no turning back.

This is the moment where people either pay attention or pay the price. Be ready.

Read the order. Learn what’s happening. Sound the alarm. Talk to your communities. And above all, do not get used to THIS.


Originally Posted By u/transcendent167 At 2025-05-10 10:37:42 AM | Source


(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Arm yourselves. He is also hiring 20k white supremisist gang members for department of homeland security too.

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 99 points 2 days ago (22 children)

That second amendment of yours actually has a purpose and this is it. You have the constitutional right to form militias to fight against tyrants.

[–] j_elgato@leminal.space -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Quick everyone! Rally behind the fat guy wearing the tac-vest! He will waddle his way towards our mutual freedom...

Oh crap, here come the stealth bombers, that Boston dynamics robot dog with a shotgun strapped to it's back, rodan the flying monster, and whatever else a .7 trillion annual defense budget will buy.

The 2nd amendment was written with a feather...

So just roll over? i guess that works... Atleast till something about you ends up on a list.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] perestroika@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

To be fair to Trump, I read the blurb at "whitehouse.gov" and while it does hopelessly attempt to construe an "invasion", it's legally untenable. My guess: he's either insane or bluffing.

They’re tearing $96.7 billion out of the economy. That’s how much undocumented immigrants contributed in taxes in 2022

This seems realistic, but could be an underestimate. Google tells me:

Immigrants make up over 19% of the US workforce as of June 2024 — over 32 million out of a total of 169 million — and participate in the labor force at a higher rate than native-born workers, according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).

How many of them would be at risk of deportation - illegal, so to say - is a much harder question because people don't tell "oh, by the way, I'm illegal" to the authorities. From an economic viewpoint, harassing 20% of the country's work force with the aim of deporting even 5% of the country's work force is committing political suicide. It's taboo of the highest order.

Stephen Miller and the Trump legal machine are now planning to label undocumented immigration as an “invasion,” which would let them bypass courts and jail people without charges, trials, or legal representation.

If they do, courts will soon rule "this is not an invasion".

If the Trump administration then ignores the courts, both the judicial branch and the population will have a common goal: to bring the executive branch into compliance. Methods will differ, of course.

P.S.

Legal advise from the devil: habeas corpus can't be suspended because of someone's assassination. :)

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Free airline tichets and an exit bonus?

As a completely legal, American-born citizen, what'll you pay me to help me escape?

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 62 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Bout to find out who REALLY supports the spirit of the 2nd amendment. Noticed that the usual “mah rahts” crowd is silent on this one.

[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 41 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think you're under valuing the importance of the "mah" part for these people.

They (Trump voters, and many Americans in general). are the most selfish people on the planet. They will gladly shit on anyone's rights to make themselves feel successful at their own life goals. I would also like to emphasize feel successful, because they would chop off their foot to own the libs

I know how self centered they are. I like to highlight their hypocrisy although at this point it’s lit up like a neon Vegas sign so maybe there’s no point anymore.

[–] Guidy@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Your typical gun nut is a fascist/racist boot licker and the rest of us tend not to be that loud.

All that my guns are going to do for me is see to it that I die in a hail of gunfire from whatever form of gestapo shows up someday.

Armed protesting works only when there’s twenty or more people. I don’t know hardly anyone who is armed because my local fellow Democrats treat owning guns like shitting your pants on purpose.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 7 points 2 days ago (10 children)

The objective is to take out two. Just two. Even one would be ok, but two: that's a win.

The problem is that the American public never benefited from the insurgency training the US gave to Afghanistan rebels during the Russian occupation. Nobody likely to rebel knows how to make IEDs, or how to booby-trap their houses. And a lot of people don't realize just how useless handguns are for these situations. The Army doesn't even issue handguns to infantry, because they're practically useless.

Long guns are cheaper, more likely to penetrate body armor, and more accurate. Folks, when you're arming yourself, skip the Glock and get a hunting rifle.

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The Army doesn’t even issue handguns to infantry, because they’re practically useless.

The rest of your post is good but this is false. I was an Army infantryman who carried an M-16/M-203 and also a Beretta. In my unit there was one person in each squad with a Beretta. It depends on your unit's mission.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RejZoR@lemmy.ml 55 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Isn't that literally due process?

[–] arotrios@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago
[–] Nay@feddit.nl 16 points 2 days ago

Essentially.

[–] scathliath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

I'm suspending my compliance with the social contract further then. No warrant? No excuses to your bosses if you come to my door, I will be acting in judicious self defense.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 13 points 2 days ago

Ight, looks like we gonna play this the hard way

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›