this post was submitted on 11 May 2025
1390 points (99.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

7627 readers
1774 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Soup@lemmy.world 157 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Bezos makes ~$2,500 every SECOND. His big idea? Get a bunch of funding to heavily undercut local bookstores and operate at a loss while destroying local businesses such that he could take over as a near monopoly. And it’s highly doubtful that it was his idea, but it worked because when you’re willing to cheat against those not willing to do the same you’re gunna win.

[–] vala@lemmy.world 28 points 5 days ago

Best part is Amazon can't even manage to shop books without destroying them at this point.

[–] eletes@sh.itjust.works 115 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (8 children)

Here's the math since I was curious

1492 was 194,440 days ago * $5000 = $972,200,000

Forbes put bezos at $209,000,000,000 for 2025

[–] MoonlightFox@lemmy.world 53 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The author of the tweet didn't go far enough. Should have gone for for 1 million USD instead. Even if you made 1 000 000$ every day, it would still not be enough.

Absolutely insane.

[–] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 33 points 5 days ago (1 children)

shit, I was about to write that you overshot by a few zeroes, and then I looked closer and put the commas and everything, and you're right: 194,440,000,000.

[–] MoonlightFox@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

Yeah, it's so fucking wild.

[–] DogWater@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Well it says that you wouldn't even be a billionaire. That's right up against the limit for being a billionaire.

But yeah bezos has over 200x that money

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] arakhis_@feddit.org 12 points 5 days ago

nEt WoRtH iS nOT sAlaRy

[–] ElderReflections@fedia.io 11 points 5 days ago (4 children)

I feel like compound interest would be important here

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 34 points 5 days ago (4 children)

It cracks me up that compound interest gets raised every time someone makes an argument about just how much money billionaires have. As if the only reason we're not billionaires is because we were too dumb to invest the $5,000 we've been making every day since Columbus sailed the ocean blue.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] peregrin5@lemm.ee 10 points 5 days ago (2 children)

When did compound interest even get invented?

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 23 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)
[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

Compound interest when charged by lenders

Today “compound interest” usually relates to reinvested dividends and amortized growth/appreciation of investments (e.g., stocks, bonds) simply because non-predatory loans are designed for payoff within some fixed term. So if the term “compound interest” applies, something unexpected is happening (e.g., default) and the loan will be bundled and sold at a discount to collections.

Not far enough back to make a difference I’d wager

I’ll take that wager! 5k daily, ignoring inflation and leap-years, compounding annually (not quarterly) at 10% annualized ROI, gives us the standard annuity formula

1.1 * 5000 * 365 (1.1^n^-1) / 0.1

where n is the number of years, which

… in 100 years becomes ~278 billion (e11)

… in 200 years becomes ~3.8 million billion (e15)

… in 300 years becomes ~53 billion billion (e19)

… in 400 years becomes ~721 thousand billion billion (e23)

… in 533 years becomes ~231 billion billion billion (e29)

If that sounds incredible to you, you’re not alone. It’s the result of a hyperbolic growth curve that starts slow but keeps accelerating indefinitely, and 533 years is a very long time in market terms, so you easily reach the silly-numbers range.

Edit: the numbers before were napkin computation. I edited this to use the standard annuity formula which should be more accurate. Point should be the same though. Exponential growth is crazy.

[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

100% agree with the point you're making and 100% disagree with the math that you did to get there.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Lol you’re right! It looks like the final number I gave was only for 400 years. I didn’t actually reach 533.

Also I was rounding numbers midway through like a pen and paper physics computation. Since that error scales exponentially, even if I had gotten to 533 the final number was guaranteed to be off.

Update: fixed it

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 days ago

DAMN YOU AND YOUR MONSTER MATHS!

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

even $1 at 1% compound interest gets ridiculous after a hundred years

[–] drathvedro@lemm.ee 3 points 5 days ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 4 points 5 days ago

look it up and let us know, we'd like to get the math done :)

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago

No it isn't because it's an imagery used to show how absurd that amount of money is. 5000 a day is easy to grasp and a few hundred years is easy to grasp.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sxan@midwest.social 3 points 5 days ago

I'm more interested about the 5k/d. That must be excluding compound interest. Like, all the money if just being stuffed into mattresses, or something. OTOH, having your money in a bank account might have reset you to zero in 1929.

load more comments (4 replies)

Whenever a capitalist says he got wealthy through hard labor ask him whose.

[–] kuhore@lemmy.world 57 points 5 days ago

If you made 7000 dollars every hour since Jesus was born, you would still not have as much money as Jeff Bezos.

[–] DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world 67 points 5 days ago

Conservative logic: Giving poor people a small amount of money will cause them not to work, whereas passing laws that benefit billionaires will cause them to create jobs.

[–] Not_Dav3@lemmy.world 46 points 5 days ago
[–] LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world 37 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] o1011o@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

Maybe but there are also lots of people with mental illness who manage it and are still decent people. Not every sociopath is a serial killer but every billionaire is fucking evil. The decision to acquire great wealth at other's expense and use it only for yourself is something else.

[–] 58008@lemmy.world 30 points 5 days ago

It makes me think of hoarders. It just happens to be the case that money is universally sought-after, and so we think "it make money, is good!" But it's not much different from someone with stacks of ancient newspapers filling 98% of their living space. It's not like Jeff could actually spend all of that money even if he wanted to. He has more than he could ever need to live the most lavish and privileged of lifestyles, including giving the same to several generations of his offspring. He could still go to space and do all that crazy shit with 10% of what he has in his bank account. It can't be normal.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 5 days ago (1 children)

548 years to a billion dollars at 5k per day. Saved you a calculator.

[–] turtlesareneat@discuss.online 8 points 5 days ago

Thank you, now try telling this to my debt collectors

[–] PhoreTwunny@lemmy.world 21 points 5 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 5 days ago

bUt hE GivE TO CharITY! i BELievE HiM! gOoD wHiTE MasTEr!

[–] 96VXb9ktTjFnRi@feddit.nl 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

taxes or the guillotine. decapitilization or decapitation.

I prefer the first option, but ultimately the outcome is what's important.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] joel_feila@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

You need 548 years

load more comments
view more: next ›