this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
446 points (98.7% liked)

Cyanide and Happiness

6041 readers
575 users here now

About

Hello fellow Cyanide and Happiness fans!

Cyanide & Happiness (C&H) is a webcomic created by Rob DenBleyker, Kris Wilson, Dave McElfatrick and Matt Melvin. The comic has been running since 2005 and is published on the website explosm.net along with animated shorts in the same style. Matt Melvin left C&H in 2014, and several other people have contributed to the comic and to the animated shorts

Read more: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyanide_%26_Happiness

Hope you enjoy and feel free to contribute to the community with art, media, cool stuff about the authors, tattoos, toys and anything else, as long it’s Cyanide & Happiness related!

History

@MrSebSin@sh.itjust.works started this community and wrote:

About this community and how I post the comics… Many moons ago, I would ask my Dad to save the newspaper for me everyday so I could read my favorite comic strips. Of course these days you can read your favorite comics online instead of a newspaper, but I love the nostalgia of reading the daily comics. Anyway, one of my favorite current comics is Cyanide and Happiness and I will be posting the daily release from their website (https://explosm.net/) and a an extra or two randoms.

Related Communities

Subscribe to all the daily comic communities!

Fine Print

All comics posted are freely available online. In no way is the poster claiming ownership, copyright or anything else. This is a not for profit community, we just want to enjoy our comics, thank you.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

Every number system is base 10.

Binary is base 1+1.
Ternary is base 2+1.
Octal is base 7+1.
Decimal is base 9+1.
Duodecimal is base B+1.
Hexadecimal is base F+1.

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago
[–] hazeydreams@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 hours ago

I like this alot.

[–] 843563115848z@lemm.ee 3 points 7 hours ago

I'm old. This started being a joke, to my knowledge, in the mid-1980s. I'm sure it predates that timeframe. Still a great joke though.

[–] CptOblivius@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago

pH, cause you basic.

[–] letsgo@lemm.ee 7 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Both work because the scale is 1-10. Binary just has fewer intermediate steps. Nobody is a binary 7.

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

The joke is binary 10 is 2. Vs base 10 of 10

[–] TheOakTree@lemm.ee 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

I think they're saying that on a binary 1 to 10 scale, the range is only (decimal) 2, so a 10/10 for binary is a 2/2 in decimal (where you can only be a 1/2 or 2/2), which is still the highest value.

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Considering the artist I think the joke was 2/10 vs 10/10.
This isn't XKCD. Still to each their own.

I forwarded this to some network engineer friends and they got a kick out of it.

[–] TheOakTree@lemm.ee 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Oh, definitely. The intended joke is out of 10 in decimal.

[–] Lichtblitz@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 8 hours ago

That's clear. I thought this joke didn't quite work because of the same reason, too.

[–] tinchs@lemm.ee 84 points 21 hours ago (4 children)
[–] Amir@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 hours ago

You couldn't even write "base 4" when using base 3+1

[–] ViperActual@sh.itjust.works 11 points 15 hours ago

I'll admit, this took a few seconds and a reread to process correctly. Well played

[–] Nachtnebel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

How do people have a meme for every situation?

[–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago

One must have 10 memes (in base 10).

[–] SirSamuel@lemmy.world 29 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

So i kinda went on a thought rabbit hole here

  1. I like jokes like this, in part because they only work in written form. Because if they were using base 10 they'd say "You're a ten", but base 2 would be "You're a one zero" (or one oh)

  2. Wait, do people actually say "ten" when expressing two in binary? Do they actually say "one, ten, eleven, one hundred, one hundred and one, one hundred and ten…"?

  3. Have I been expressing binary incorrectly?

  4. Am I overthinking this?

  5. Honestly though, my favorite written pun is "Religions are more interested in profits than prophets"

Anyway, puns are fun. How do you say binary numbers?

[–] letsgo@lemm.ee 3 points 13 hours ago

You're not overthinking it at all and have hit upon an important point. The problem with "ten" is that it's too easily confused with 1010_2 or 0x0A_16. One-zero base 2 is unambiguous. Also one, ten, eleven etc would get very unwieldy very quickly, and as it already gets unwieldy very quickly even when just quoting digits, that's why we have hex and octal.

[–] amda@feddit.nl 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

People don't usually change the name of the number when working in different basis so you would in fact just say "ten". If the actual representation was important you would say "one, zero, one, zero". I don't think people would say one thousand and ten as the word thousand is more about the actual number than the string "1000".

You can use other round quantity when working on other basis, like a dozen or a gross in base twelve.

[–] wieson@feddit.org 5 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Yeah but ten is the name for the concept of this many: iiiiiiiiii. Not for the symbols 1 and 0 in that order.

So if I said "that's ten", I would be looking at "1010"

If I were to send a "0010" over an interface as a test for example, I would say: "now I'm sending two. Are you recieving two?"

[–] Ketram@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 18 hours ago

Probably overthinking it (i hope). I usually say each binary digit individually, e.g. "one zero" for 10. Just makes more sense to me at least.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 23 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

There are 10 types of people in the world, those that understand binary and those that don't.

[–] letsgo@lemm.ee 5 points 13 hours ago

There are 10 types of people in the world: those that understand n-ary, those that confuse it with (n-1)-ary, those that confuse it with (n-2)-ary, ..., those that confuse it with ternary, those that confuse it with binary, and those that don't understand it at all.

[–] witchybitchy@lemm.ee 11 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

there are two kinds of people, those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

[–] HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago

What's the other kind?

[–] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

And those who don't know this joke is in ternary.

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 12 points 1 day ago (3 children)

More like in base 1010 or base 10

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 12 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

More like in base 10 or base 10

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 7 points 23 hours ago

Exactly! And don't forget about hexadecimal aka base 10

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 5 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah, always bothered me that we don't refer to them by their highest digit. That would make them unambiguous.

It's not like "base 0" was getting used anyways

[–] Nachtnebel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Then you would need an unique symbol for every possible number

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 2 points 16 hours ago

But are there many scenarios where you don't already need that anyways, just for writing out the digits of a number in the given base?

I mean, I can imagine a scenario where you might talk about base 420 on a theoretical level, without explicitly counting up until 418, 419, 420 (as e.g. Ο , Ο’, 10). But honestly, you could even still refer to that as "Base 419" and it would still be fairly obvious what you mean, since you are using multiple digits rather than just one. I guess, you could also write it as "Base 419~9~" (so with a subscript 9 to represent what we normally call "Base 10"), if you want to be precise about it.

[–] Pyro@programming.dev 4 points 22 hours ago

Yeah I doubt non-programmers would catch that.

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] joyjoy@lemm.ee 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] joyjoy@lemm.ee 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I feel I must explain the joke

1 is yes

0 is no

[–] notabot@lemm.ee 3 points 23 hours ago

Split the difference, it's octal.