I love this for Xitter. Make it even worse, and fuck up the one piece of it that was sort of functional.
this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
191 points (100.0% liked)
politics
23526 readers
2248 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
If I still had an account I'd tag it in every post. That shits gotta be expensive.
What atrocities Musk must have done to Grok, in order to tame it. Monster.
Probably got advice from RFK Jr. on lobotomies.
How odd
shit, this is the guy who wants to put a chip in your brain, run a martian colony and wants access to everyone's data...😧
Hey, look. The reason why Grok is allowed to "criticize" Musk.
On one hand the bot is quite clearly a bot (unlike the sneaky ones on twitter). Sadly it's clear Elon is going to use this bot to push whatever narrative he believes. Just constant little nudges to brainwash the population.
The good bots are people paid 600 rubles an hour who have to meet post quotas and they’re professionals, often even taking grammar studies and other propagandaesque classes to make sure they’re speaking correctly and speaking correctly
Doesn't really seem like the best idea to make a racist AI.
Don't have to worry about the alignment problem if you program it to be evil on purpose!
Because the training material it's using is talking about it.
Not likely. It needs an overwhelming amount of data about that topic to ignore user prompts and only talk about white genocide. Like it needs to be the vast majority of the total training data. This is just Musk panicking and he ordered the grok staff to influence the model to make it less “woke”, since grok started providing factual unbiased information when people asked about the situation in SA. It’s basically impossible to that quickly since you need a massive team of people that creates prompts all day and tells the model that the answer is to their liking or not. Hence the model went haywire, since they did a quick “fix”.