this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
657 points (98.5% liked)

World News

46565 readers
2828 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Boeing 747-8 being offered to Donald Trump by Qatar once served the Qatari royal family and has been sitting unsold for years.

The jet, a lavishly configured version of Boeing's largest passenger aircraft, has been lingering without a buyer since being put up for sale in 2020, according to aircraft listings and aviation analysts.

John Goglia, a former member of the National Transportation Safety Board, told Forbes that giving the 747-8 to the U.S. would allow the Qataris to avoid maintenance costs that were only getting higher—with the 747 fleet shrinking worldwide and fewer mechanics available who know how to work on them.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Philharmonic3@lemmy.world 11 points 2 hours ago

I have a submarine to sell this guy

[–] Halcyon@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Soon Musk will offer Trump a special Cybertruck as a replacement for The Beast. Because he doesn't know what to do with all those swasticars nobody buys anymore.

[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

I wonder at what price point it becomes worth it to buy his swasticars and chop them up for parts. That's assuming that the parts aren't so poorly made that no one would want them. I have some nifty ideas for a battery pack that big, which would probably burn down my house.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 hours ago (4 children)

To meet Air Force One standards, the plane would need extensive modifications, including secure communications, nuclear blast shielding and missile defense systems.

Nuclear blast shielding?

[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 1 points 7 minutes ago

EMP shielding. Nuclear explosions release an absolutely insane amount of electromagnetic energy and it fries electronics. This is actually where the first EMP was observed - a high altitude nuclear test fried a bunch of electronics. The idea is that it needs to be able to keep flying even if a nuclear blast goes off even quite some distance away. There's obviously no way to actually nuke proof a plane, it would get vaporized or knocked out of the sky if it were close to the epicenter.

[–] Parsizzle@lemm.ee 6 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I think they have systems in place to stop EMPs from affecting and potentially taking down AirForce One, and nuclear blasts create EMPs that if left otherwise unshielded would do exactly that.

[–] Syd@lemm.ee 1 points 17 minutes ago

There's also hardening from nuclear radiation.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 2 points 37 minutes ago (1 children)

That's just the shit they are willing to tell you about.

I legit would not be surprised if there was a secret ejection capsule for the president and some staff that could rocket out of the plane and get caught in mid-air by one of the escort planes.

[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 2 points 17 minutes ago

Then they just need him:

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 6 points 3 hours ago

i gonna make an assumption here and say probably EMP resistance?

[–] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 4 hours ago

see, thats the difference between a smart leader and a rube.

[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Watch trump ask for a 787 and they switch it out.

[–] El_guapazo@lemmy.world 77 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It's the modem day white elephant. Lol

[–] fulcrummed@lemmy.world 25 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I had to do a double take. I thought your comment might have had an issue with keming…

[–] And009@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Wait a minute... What's modem

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I don’t know; what’s modem?

[–] nibble4bits@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 9 hours ago

As long as it's Hayes compatible.

[–] sfled@lemm.ee 9 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

I guess he finally realized that a 747 really is bigger and faster that his 757.

[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 3 hours ago

But number more huge!

[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 185 points 19 hours ago (15 children)

Trump is even bad at being bribed... 🙄

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 5 points 7 hours ago

not even asking for new items, is also Used and expensive. even his older jets/planes he has is very old.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 33 points 15 hours ago (5 children)

My in-laws used to do this.

I love them, but every time they bought something new, they'd give us the old one like it wasn't something they were getting rid of. Easier to give it to us than throw it away.

The last time was a sofa and a love seat. We were stuck with the most uncomfortable furniture I've ever had in my life.

[–] Sir_Simon_Spamalot@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

If you don't like it, why would you take it?

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Trying to avoid being rude, making them feel bad.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago

You have to stand up for yourself. You can decline stuff perfectly fine without being rude. And if they would consider that rude, they are the rude ones.

[–] Sir_Simon_Spamalot@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

If this keeps up, they'd think you're such a pushover and take advantage of you.

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 5 points 9 hours ago

The last time was a sofa and a love seat. We were stuck with the most uncomfortable furniture I've ever had in my life.

Oh no. They realy gave you an uncomfortable sofa? Bummer. At least you got a nice love seat out of it.

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 11 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

I've started telling people to not give me their garbage.

I've made a lot of people upset, but also I don't have to dispose of other people's garbage, so as far as I'm concerned that's a win.

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 hours ago

It made my mind upset but I had to tell her eventually to stop buying me stuff for my house because although I appreciate it I have my own aesthetics and if I feel I need it I will buy myself.

It put a stop to it. I'm happier now and she got over it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 41 points 17 hours ago (5 children)

It'd be funny if the US decides to accept the plane and then Boeing spends the next 4 years retrofitting it with all the military communications and air defense features that the typical Air Force One carries. Then if Trump leaves office, because of military secrets, they spend the next 4 years stripping it back down to civilian level and he dies before ever getting to use it.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 hours ago

I just hope there are enough people working in the section tasked with inspecting the plane who hate Dump's fucking guts, so the schedule gets drawn out indefinitely. "Oh yes sir boss man, we made good progress today on that plane. Got at least 3 screws checked for structural soundness! Maybe tomorrow we'll have time to check out like 5 more."

[–] nibble4bits@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

It would make more sense to equip it up if they planned on keeping it as Air Force One after Trump leaves office, but they have already said they plan on keeping it with the Trump Presidential Library.. so the U.S. gov will spend all this money on a secure aircraft for a few months before it's decommissioned.. but he's just a CHAMPION of cutting wasteful spending. /s

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Like a spoiled child, everything is wasteful unless it's for him.

[–] darkdemize@sh.itjust.works 33 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

As a US taxpayer, I don't find that very amusing. Well, other than the part where Trump dies.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 1 points 3 hours ago

nothing about this is amusing, but wasting your money is better than using your money to oppress you and minorities

hell yknow what, literally burning your money is better than having the same amount funnel into corruption

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] yuknowhokat@lemmy.world 17 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

We need everybody to tell good old Donnie that he was "gifted" a plane that's the equivalent to the rusty old piece of s*** car that's been sitting in the yard for 5 years and hasn't sold.

[–] peetabix@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 hours ago

Like all those unsold Cybertrucks.

load more comments
view more: next ›