this post was submitted on 17 May 2025
325 points (97.1% liked)

politics

23526 readers
2321 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Oh I think I know how this will end.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pnut@lemm.ee 5 points 1 hour ago

I get gun enthusiasm. Like, as a hobby. Those folks that hang out at the range are as nerdy as the folks that hang out at the model airplane club. This isn't for them. This is for the baddies. It's strange considering that Trump had a close attempt on his life involving a gun with iron sights. You would think he would want to be the last person involved in approving more effective people killers.

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

that means YOU can buy one too.

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 22 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

All the other kids with their pumped up kicks

Sandy Hook 2 Electric Boogaloo. I can feel nothing but sorrow for the children of america's education system. Forget not Columbine, Sandy Hook, Uvalde, Virginia Tech, Parkland, Texas Tower, Red Lake, or Santa Fe.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 13 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

Wasn't the bump stock banned by Trump after the Vegas shooting? Then unbanned under Biden?

[–] OmegaMan@lemmings.world 13 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Supreme Court unbanned it 6-3. Not really Biden's call.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee -4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I said unbanned under Biden. I didn't say he actually did it.

[–] OmegaMan@lemmings.world 13 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Sure, but "under" implies he had authority over the decision.

[–] Pnut@lemm.ee -1 points 1 hour ago

It shouldn't. That's not how it works.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee -4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I am aware. I wasn't sure how to word it.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 6 points 2 hours ago

“Then unbanned by the Supreme Court during Biden” would do just fine

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

In other countries they sell modified versions of these handguns that cannot be made into machine guns with a switch. This is the real solution, but for some reason gun manufacturers can do no wrong in the US and are not held to higher safety standards.

[–] LucidiaDiamond@lemm.ee 2 points 13 hours ago

In Belgium, of all places, you can buy fully auto weapons from shops with just a collectors license.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Do you have evidence to support that? Because AFAIK, the Glocks made both in the US and Austria have exactly the same design. OTOH, in most of Europe, it's very difficult to get the appropriate license for a handgun, so it's largely irrelevant.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Glocks sold in Europe are designed not to work with switches. This is common knowledge.

https://www.abc4.com/news/national/ap-new-jersey-minnesota-sue-glock-over-switch-that-allows-pistols-to-fire-like-machine-gun/

"Glock is profiting by continuing to sell the adaptable version in U.S. markets, even as they make and sell handguns in Europe that cannot accommodate such a switch."

Do you have evidence to support your claims or should I just block you now?

Edit: A quick look through you comments shows you are definitely a gun nut. Hard pass on discussing anything with your denialist guns r gud mentality.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 2 points 2 hours ago

Hard pass on discussing anything with your denialist guns r gud mentality

Yeah, isn't is strange that someone doesn't want the state to have the monopoly on violence, and believes in civil rights? Weird, right?

From your article:

"Platkin said Glock is profiting by continuing to sell the adaptable version in U.S. markets, even as they make and sell handguns in Europe that cannot accommodate such a switch."

 This is something I've having a really hard time finding a source on. Everything I can find says that that about half of the Glock pistols that are sold in the US are made in Austria. And, as I said, sales in Europe for pistols are very tightly controlled, meaning that very few pistols--relatively speaking--are getting into the hands of anyone other than cops and military, so I'm not sure that there's a strong motive for them to make the design alteration in the EU.
 Aside from the assertion from New Jersey's AG, I just can't find a source for that. I'm not saying that it doesn't exist, and, if the AG is correct, then yes, Glock should change their design in the US. There's already precedent for this; open bolt semi-automatic firearms manufactured after 1986 are banned because they can--in general--be readily converted to full auto. However, given how many Glocks currently exist in the US, that would be an enormous legal mess that could possibly result in the National Firearms Act being declared unconstitutional.

"Also known as “auto switches,” the devices, which are already illegal in New Jersey and some other states, [...]"

They're illegal in EVERY state; it covered under federal law, specifically the National Firearms Act (1934) and Firearm Owners Protection Act (1986). Even if it was legal in New Jersey, it would still be a felony to possess or use one.

[–] MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

Because why not?!

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago

Good luck kids going to school in the United States

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 9 points 22 hours ago

This will help his pardoned militia in 3 years

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

at least they haven't resticted sales to registered republicans...

[–] Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“We were going to win this,” said the former senior ATF official. “These things are not like bump stocks."

Forced reset devices are actually exactly like bump stocks in that they're legal because they force a distinct action of the trigger for every round fired. The legal definition of a machine gun is a firearm that fires more than one round per single action of the trigger. They haven't bothered to amend or expand that definition, so these types of devices keep skirting by on a technicality.

I suppose the argument could be made that forced reset devices work in a very similar way to a machine gun's auto sear, the difference being that they act on the trigger of the gun rather than the hammer, but it still doesn't meet the government's own definition of a machine gun.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cornpop@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Nice I’ve been wanting a FRT. machine guns aren’t very good for mass shootings. All your ammo is gone instantly and you’re way less accurate. It’s good for suppressing fire, and fun in the backyard. This is not going to lead to more gun deaths.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 8 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

I like how you are acting like most of us haven't played an FPS. The biggest difference is that there is no balance nerf between the damage an automatic bullet does and a semiautomatic bullet does. It's certainly leading to more gun deaths in Mexico, where a lot of these weapons are getting exported down to, although it is refreshing to act like school shootings still aren't a thing.

I fully expect for police to have to fear being "suppressive fired" soon enough, there are enough militant groups within the US that will enjoy the news, specially given the number of their members that were pardoned for Jan 6th.

[–] Cornpop@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Games are not equal to real life. 99 percent of people would have no idea how to control a machine gun.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

It's enough to learn when you are being gaslighted about machine gun ammo consumption. Yes, it eats ammo faster, but it is also more dangerous. Furthermore, being fully automatic doesn't mean you spam it until it consumes the whole cartridge, it means you have more control how many bullets you can track with each trigger engagement. It's why burst mode exists, but better. People do have an idea in how to control ammo consumption, it is a core game mechanic with most games with guns.

[–] mothersprotege@lemm.ee 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

True enough, but it's not very hard to learn.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

How many people actually go out to a range every single week and burn through a couple hundred rounds working on training drills though? I did shooting at distance today (100-550y with .223) and burned through about 140 rounds, and most ranges don't even have that kind of distance available. (Thank fuck the RSO had a spotting scope; I couldn't see my splash in the grass to see where my rounds were going when I didn't hit. He was able to see trace with his scope though.)

[–] mothersprotege@lemm.ee 2 points 13 hours ago

Not a lot, I imagine! Still a pretty low hurdle to clear. All you really need is ammunition and a place to shoot it. It sure helps to have a spotter/RSO/somebody who knows what they're doing, but you can muddle through all right given enough trigger time.

[–] Chef_Boyardee@lemm.ee 1 points 15 hours ago

What if I've watched Rambo? Does that work?

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Let us not forget... an FRT doesn't even constitute a "machine gun" by their own definition!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago (27 children)

Remember gang, if your ID has an l, g, b, t, or q on it you qualify as desperately in need of guns.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 1 points 24 minutes ago

Every driver's Licence with daTe of Birth and orGan donor has LGBT on it.

load more comments (26 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›