this post was submitted on 17 May 2025
630 points (99.1% liked)

politics

23538 readers
2232 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wolfarine@lemm.ee 8 points 40 minutes ago (2 children)

So the "elected" government is trying to control prices? Isn't that the definition of socialism?

[–] Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca 6 points 32 minutes ago

Socialism is only bad when the left does it.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca -2 points 29 minutes ago
[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 hour ago

Rages at reality for doing the thing everyone said would happen?

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 points 37 seconds ago

What the fuck did this moron think was going to happen?

[–] Birch@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Hahaha, get fucked both of them

[–] Hyphlosion@lemm.ee -1 points 24 minutes ago

But not too hard. I rely on Walmart delivery because reasons.

[–] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

doesnt sound very free market to me

if they raise prices because they have to, thats just normal

if they raise prices because they can get away with it, thats kinda nasty though

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

Ironically, the Economy was one of the number one concerns among voters during the election. People blamed Biden for the stores raising prices, while the Biden admin actually investigated major grocers over artificially high prices, and then elected Trump who is actually responsible for raising prices.

[–] IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago

Captain dipshit said he’ll be watching and so will the customers. So? The price will go up from the tariffs. It’s like he struggles to be this much of a moron. I feel like he’s so stupid that I get dumber every time I have to listen to him talk.

[–] Azal@pawb.social 9 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Hahaha! This is the ONE time I agree with Trump.

All defending the house that Sam built, it is the richest company in the world by revenue beating out Amzaon and state owned organizations like Saudi Aramco and Chinese controlled organizations. It regularly bullies its way into small towns, demanding tax cuts and the infrastructure to build their stores, run those stores at a loss until all competition is gone then raises prices to squeeze out the area. Then is happy to shut down the "bottom performing stores" leaving a wasteland behind for these towns that lost everything to the mega giant. They're turning the home town of Bentonville into Austin, even driving out local business for their friends out of Austin.

And the biggest thing is... Project 2025, all of this going on, written by the Heritage Foundation... The Walton Family Foundation is one of the big funders of the Heritage Foundation as well as many of the other Project 2025 advisory board partners. They made it easy to search even! https://www.waltonfamilyfoundation.org/grants-database

I've come from its home town, Walmart has always pushed a radical republican conservative agenda. Walmart is not some hapless victim, this is pure 100% leopards dining on some faces that voted for the leopards eating faces party.

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The only thing I agree with on Trump here is that he's correctly pointing out that WalMart made billions in profits last year. Yes, WalMart supported this monster in the first place thinking it would work out for them in the long run, so it's a leopards eating faces scenario for sure, and I wouldn't be sad if WalMart lost profits this year because of Trump's stupidity. It's just too bad that regular people are going to suffer because WalMart killed the small businesses that used to support towns that they wormed their way into.

We aren't even done adjusting to inflation pricing, and here we are not getting slapped with a Trump Tax on top of it. Madness.

[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 1 points 12 minutes ago

That's the one thing I agree with him on as well, but honestly what did he expect? Trump—of all people—should understand greed. Billionaires aren't going to wilfully take a pay cut unless you force them to.

[–] Jackcooper@lemmy.world 11 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

WalMarts whole thing is tiny profit margins

They literally don't have a choice. It isn't about giving up profit margins, it's about having a profit margin AT ALL.

[–] Azal@pawb.social 14 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Walmarts whole thing is driving out competition. They're the richest company in the world and supported Trump. They asked for this.

[–] Anomalocaris@lemm.ee 5 points 1 hour ago

chance are they will rise prices way more than necessary to cover for the tariffs.

they will cry that they had no choice and have record profits.

[–] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 16 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

It's depressing how important this is. Walmart is core to a lot of American's purchasing. If Walmart decides to kiss the ring, even for a while, when they stop could determine when a wave of anger will hit, maybe even control the midterms. If they just pass on the prices now, many americans' cost of living is going to soar, right at the same time many of them will be facing layoffs as businesses choke to death on materials costs.

Anyone else remember what happened last time large numbers of americans experienced large amounts of free time? Do you think they'll be any happier when they are experiencing that level of free time without the benefit of CoViD stimulus? A lot of people are going to get hurt.

[–] PhAzE@lemmy.ca 4 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Their costs go up because of the tariffs, he can't expect them to lose profit at scale just to appease him. It would be a super bad business decision on Walmarts side if they do that.

[–] LogicalFallacy@lemm.ee 6 points 8 hours ago

They literally can't without getting sued by investors. Look at United Healthcare - they're getting sued for lost profits because they couldn't deny more claims after Luigi.

[–] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 8 hours ago

I'll be shocked if Walmart choses to "eat the cost" for tariffs.

They don't "eat the cost" so their employees don't need food stamps, a program also on the chopping block. If they gut medicate/medicaid the Walmart pharmacy will also definitely feel that loss.

[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Perfect malicious compliance opportunity: the price tag stays the same, but add an itemized Trump Tax for the difference.

[–] Azal@pawb.social 3 points 6 hours ago

Walmart won't kiss the ring. They supported Trump. The only thing they'll do is fight him if it looks like they can't control him.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 12 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Just more displaying that the rich, and particularly rich people like trump, live in the land of no consequences. They make demands that others pay for, never themselves, and when underlings defy them they become furious. Walmart CEOs are underlings, now.

[–] BadlyTimedLuck@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

I hope this more of a "don't bite the hand that feeds you," and Trump recieves SOME kind of consequence. He's been a conman for years, and at some point, CEOs should be able to see that. Like, do they really think he has THEIR best interests in mind? We're lucky he's even accepting that one plane as a bribe, since I expected him to sell out for the price of a big mac with fries (no drink).

[–] Volume@lemmy.world 13 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

And once the trade war is done, the prices will remain higher due to "record profits" and "people will continue to pay it because they have to".

[–] Azal@pawb.social 2 points 5 hours ago

100% This. Walmart is far from the "aw shucks" helping the common man image it wants to portray

[–] NotJohnSmith@feddit.uk 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Certainly what we appear to have experienced in the UK, I'm sure it's the same in other countries

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Britain’s a bit different, as it’s caught in a perfect storm. It got a large amount of its energy from Russia, and the invasion hit just as Britain was also pouring massive investment into renewables and nuclear, which has to be paid for via energy bills. Add onto that the £40bn annual loss to the economy from Brexit and yeah, prices aren’t going down any time soon, but it isn’t necessarily because of profiteering. For example, rail freight operators have mothballed their electric fleet because the tariff per mile is so much higher than diesel at the moment. And they’re a business sector who can readily change from electricity.

[–] NotJohnSmith@feddit.uk 2 points 3 hours ago

That's really interesting stuff, thanks for the reply

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago

The American Lukashenko supporters are clueless about tariffs. Oh the fuck well, let them pay more for products in every single red run welfare Oblast in the USA. Like many have typed, those prices are not going to decrease.

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

Back to school prices are gonna see the most change.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Wal-Mart just does not give Trump any respect. /s

[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 12 points 11 hours ago

Does Walmart even wear a suit? A lot of people are saying they don't. Good people

[–] aeshna_cyanea@lemm.ee 16 points 14 hours ago

Man he really is the American lukashenko D:

load more comments
view more: next ›