this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
1116 points (97.3% liked)

News

29647 readers
2353 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 45 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

J K Rowling can go suck a fuck.

It would have been so easy for her to shut her mouth and keep supporting the feminist causes she did support, and instead she’s spent so much time and political capital attacking the ideas she doesn’t support.

It’s fucking asinine. Her mother clearly never taught her to shut the fuck up if she has nothing of value to say.

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 23 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Piece of shit author continues being a piece of shit. More news at 11.

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's good to publicly remember every now and then. Plenty of people don't know that she's a raging transphobe, and if even one of them recently joined lemmy and sees this post and is convinced to no longer buy her work, then that makes this post worth it, imo.

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 13 points 3 days ago

Yeah, good point

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] tal@lemmy.today 42 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Rowling donated £70,000 (roughly $88,200) to the anti-trans group For Women Scotland in 2024 after it lost its challenge to a 2018 Scottish law that legally recognized trans women as women. The group appealed its case to the U.K. Supreme Court, which ruled last month that trans women aren’t considered women under the nation’s Equality Act.

Rowling responded to the decision by posting a picture of her having a drink and smoking a cigar, with the text “I love it when a plan comes together.”

Setting aside the question of the cause itself, I'm not sure that taunting people is a good way to effect social change.

kagis for image

https://metro.co.uk/2025/04/17/jk-rowling-says-i-love-a-plan-comes-together-supreme-court-result-22927389/

JK Rowling smokes cigar as she celebrates court ruling on yacht in the Bahamas

Yeah, that seems likely to antagonize people.

[–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 41 points 3 days ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago (5 children)

It amazes me how some people just refuse to put their money to anything actually useful.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] oliver@lemmy.lothians.social 10 points 3 days ago

Imagine what good things could be done with the money instead of using it for stuff that's non of her business. The older they get, the more conservative they turn out to be - sad for someone who brought a wonderful world to life once...

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago

It’s always the people you most expect.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I heard a YouTuber refer to her as Jeepers Kreepers Rowling recently, and it makes me giggle. What an awful woman.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago

What an ugly human being

[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago

What a rotten bitch

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 3 days ago (4 children)

It's this actually new? Wasn't it already known that she did that?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] nieminen@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (25 children)

Okay, I'm sure I'll get vote-bombed here, please don't jump the gun, I'm pro lgbtq+. I don't give a shit who or how someone loves, just hope they're allowed to be happy with themselves (unless they're hurting people, obviously).

I believe trans rights, and womens rights, are human rights. I don't think anybody should be treated differently due to gender, sex, race, or orientation, and they shouldn't be discriminated against in any way. I'm just trying to make sure I understand fully for when I defend the pro trans position that I believe to be correct.

I started looking further into this because a friend of mine, which is a total HP nerd, was trying to give me some context on where her anti-trans activism comes from. It SEEMS like she mostly wants to make sure women stay safe (paraphrasing her own words here). In Scotland apparently they're changing things so that a dude can just say he's not a dude, and be legally allowed in all women only spaces if they register with the government or whatever. I can absolutely see how that could be used in a predatory manor, and can see that side of the argument.

I just read her piece here: https://www.jkrowling.com/opinions/j-k-rowling-writes-about-her-reasons-for-speaking-out-on-sex-and-gender-issues/ To make sure I'm getting as complete of a look at the situation as I can.

And it confused the issue a little for me. All of her arguments seem to be coming from a place of reason, and some of them made sense (if the referenced stats were true). Most of her arguments seem to come from a "I don't want to make it easier for male predators to prey on women" standpoint, which makes sense at the surface level.

is the current climate making it fashionable to transition? I find it hard to believe someone would go that far without truly thinking it's the right thing to do, but some people are highly influenced by peer pressure. I can also see maybe some women wanting to change to escape the misogyny of our current world. I'm a straight cis-male, and I can't personally resonate with the idea of changing that because it's "popular" or whatever, so I don't put a lot of credence into that argument, but I'm not everyone 🤷.

I also understand that sex and gender are separate, and Rowling seems to be on the train that conflates it, which might be the basis for her position.

Please help me learn and understand. Someone with more context or knowledge, please let me know. I'd love the opinion of some trans folks if you see this. Rowling says she's getting support from trans women for her positions. And I'm sure that's true, there's bound to be some, like there's women who support patriarchy.

Edit, reordered my statements so my current position is clear at the start

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (6 children)

I started looking further into this because a friend of mine, which is a total HP nerd, was trying to give me some context on where her anti-trans activism comes from.

You deliberately found someone with strong bias to get info from? Maybe you should think about that.

I also understand that sex and gender are separate, and Rowling seems to be on the train that conflates it, which might be the basis for her position.

I think you need to back up a little more on Rowling. If you start dissecting her works, you'll see she has born/birth/blood nature being a reoccurring theme. Hagrid is naturally angry. Voldemort is evil because he was a rape baby. House Elves are natural ~~slaves~~servants. The Weasley family will always be poor(even when Harry should be paying rent or at least buying them a new car). Hell, the Irish character keeps blowing things up. Things are the way they are at birth and anyone who pushes against the natural order is wrong. Hermione Granger, the other outside to magical society took issue with the House Elves being treated as slaves and everyone, including the House Elves and Harry Potter, the first outsider and someone who should have no bias for slavery, treated her as being annoying and wrong for caring.(Also remember when JK implied that Hermione could be Black? Yeah, this isn't a good look.)

If you want a deep dive into Rowling's writings that isn't centered on the trans issue, check out Shaun's review of her total body of work at the time.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)
[–] muusemuuse@lemm.ee 15 points 3 days ago

Fucking god, she’s still doing this shit? She’s going to turn her franchise into another Tesla.

[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is just sad. What could have made JKR use her wealth in such an unkind way?

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

she seems to have been harboring these feeling since she before she wrote harry potter, there are many people attributing her books to transphobia and antisemitism in a subltle way.

[–] maxxadrenaline@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

moaning myrtle probably killed herself because she wasn't accepted.

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Ugh. What a despicable person. I was thinking about pirating her shitty TV show, but i don't think i will. They probably base popularity, among other things, on torrents. I don't want her to have any popularity. She's a really gross person :/

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›