this post was submitted on 30 May 2025
203 points (95.5% liked)

Funny

9953 readers
859 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Some day all of those will be valuable cultural artifacts. Or alternatively, they'll be all that's left of humanity. I guess we're moving towards the second scenario right now.

[–] CanadianCarl@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago

I call dibs on the urine, and vomit bags.

[–] Glitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

Valuable, but also radioactive and locked away probably

[–] paranoia 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

200 tons is less than I would have expected honestly.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm shocked it's that much!

[–] Contentedness@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 week ago

Guess it depends if it's 200 tons worth moon-weight or 200 tons here on Earth.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm expecting all of those bits and pieces will be used in the construction of lunar settlements. It took a lot to get that stuff up there, may as well use it in place.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Nobody is going to use 1960s tech to build a base on the moon. Not to mention that those are literally history.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Someday a tourist will plant their foot right on top of Armstrong's first step and take a selfie while their friends chip pieces off the lander for souvenirs.

[–] Gurei@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Why not? If you need x feet of wall to insulate against radiation, why toss some treated relics in with the soil mix?