this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
744 points (99.6% liked)

politics

24084 readers
3153 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wampus@lemmy.ca 6 points 21 hours ago

I agree that this is a significant issue / problem for democratic countries, and that the trend of violence towards journalists in America is an obvious concern.

That said, the media has generally turned a blind eye as Israel killed a record number of journalists the past few years - and not only that, but they continued to broadcast out that regimes narrative. Given that the media / journalists "at large" have ignored this sort of issue in another "democratic" country that's gone authoritarian, I find it totally unsurprising that another authoritarian-trending regime feels emboldened / empowered to treat journalists the same.

[–] Robotsandstuff@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Hi all, I hope people hear this and the post is not hidden. This is an insecure system, and talking on here about things you want to or will do will be used by the regime.

Please take this as it is meant. I fully appreciate the anger and the pain you are all feeling, and you are totally right to fight, but you must fight smart.

DO NOT LET YOUR ANGER GET THE BEST OF YOU. If this goes the way it's looking like it might, direct fights with whatfever is left of the States' forces is suicide, and the good guys need all the boots on the ground you can muster.

There are many veterans of the war on terror who are literal experts on the tactics needed to win this; seek them out.

Assume all coms are monitored because they are. Look after each other, people.

A friend who knows the score.

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Crooks don't like being told on.

[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Trump should be impeached for this, and many other high crimes and misdemeanors in recent months.

[–] GoobyMcMooby@lemmy.zip 76 points 2 days ago (25 children)

I think it’s about time the press and protesters start showing up strapped. These people clearly don’t have any fear and are just power tripping on people for simply being there. Put the fear of God back into these pigs.

[–] mean_bean279@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The people of sh.it.just.works and Lemmy.world both loved to try and act like I was out of line for calling for open carry the other night. Unfortunately California state law doesn’t allow for it. I think that it’s the only way to get them to back off with the Marines, the National Guard and with ICE though. If they’re not going to be afraid of us then they’re never going to change and the people saying “don’t give them a reason to escalate” will keep saying that up to the first battles at which point they’ll run and cower.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Fun fact, the real wave of gun restrictions started with the Black Panthers open carrying in California back in in the 60s.

https://www.history.com/articles/black-panthers-gun-control-nra-support-mulford-act

That led to the Mulford Act:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mulford_Act

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

I hope Newsom puts forward legislation to eliminate the Mulford Act. That would give the Neoconfederates serious pause.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The state law made by fucking Reagan and should thusly be ignored.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Jury nullification, baby. Just make sure you're headed in front of your peers and not getting dumped into a concentration camp in El Salvador.

[–] mean_bean279@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Completely agree. We should have gotten rid of the law. It was born out of racism and restricts our rights in Cali.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 days ago (8 children)

Escalation to violence is exactly what they want. It gives them all the justification they need to invoke the Insurrection Act, declare martial law and suspend your Constitutional rights. And not just in California.

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

If they want escalation then they can take it when ever they want. Police just wear plain clothes and throw a brick. Bam and done, at this point it’s best to just assume violence and act accusingly, it’s not like the media are impartial.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Escalation to violence is exactly what they want.

Are you sure? It seems like the escalation is what they don't want. And that's why they're having to call in the marines to try and scare people back into submission.

Passive acquiescence and blind obedience is what they want. That's why the news media is so eager to label these protests as abnormal, intolerable, and anti-American. If the conservatives wanted protests, they wouldn't be so eager to censor the protests' advocates and so worried about valorizing these opposition efforts.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is that why they're shooting random protesters with rubber bullets, even though there's no justification? What are they trying to "prevent"?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Further protest and disruption of ICE raids by protesters.

[–] GoobyMcMooby@lemmy.zip 34 points 2 days ago

I didn’t say start blasting. Right wingers show up strapped all the time showing they mean business and are given plenty of space as a consequence. The cops can do the same for other Americans. If they can’t then it shows the public that it was never about individual rights and all about allowing one group they favor to get away with it.

[–] Jerkface@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (17 children)

Protesters urged not to give trump administration pretext for what it is already doing

edit: Oh, what the hell. Let's add a snippet.

Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass publicly urged protesters Monday not to give the Trump administration any pretext for what they’re already doing and will keep doing no matter what. “Angelenos—don’t engage in violence and give the administration an excuse to inflict all the damage they have been inflicting carte blanche for months on end,” said Bass, adding that Trump and his team are just looking for a reason to respond with violence, as they would have done whether or not any of this happened.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] mean_bean279@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

Where does the goal post moving stop? It’s not an escalation of violence if you don’t use it. It’s a threat to escalate to violence. If they aren’t afraid of you then they’re not going to change.

When they declare martial law are you going to be saying the same thing and hoping by just chanting loudly you change their mind?

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Problem is the situation won't improve without an escalation

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 17 points 2 days ago (13 children)

So what? Do you just watch until you're being herded into concentration camps anyway? This is the first instance of effective resistance to Trump (the April parades don't count) since January and they're calling in the Marines already. This was simply never going to end peacefully, because any effective act of mass resistance was going to be suppressed violently; avoiding escalation means avoiding resistance.

Edit: This person is not arguing in good faith. I cornered them in this thread and they claimed that ICE won't shoot people unless provoked and then that they're shooting people to provoke an escalation. Their argument seems to hinge on the idea that rubber bullets are harmless pranks you should just suck up.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 7 points 2 days ago

Californians have a right to defend themselves

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Reporter Ruben Salazar March 3, 1928 – August 29, 1970. Murdered by the LASD.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

During the march, Los Angeles County Sheriff's deputy Thomas Wilson struck and immediately killed Salazar with a tear-gas projectile. No criminal charge was filed, but Salazar's family reached an out-of-court financial settlement with the county.

Classic USA

load more comments
view more: next ›