this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2025
665 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

71537 readers
4652 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

France is moving to classify X as a pornographic website, a designation that would place it under the country’s mandatory age verification and digital ID laws.

This step, if finalized, would force the company to either implement robust age-gating mechanisms or restrict access to adult content altogether to avoid being cut off from younger users.

It would also mean that users have to show ID to access the platform, introducing major implications for privacy and free speech.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 23 points 6 days ago

Nazi propaganda: I sleep

Porn: Real shit

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 51 points 6 days ago

Twitter is shit, but France went really nuts.

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago

Never expected the place known for nude beaches and a president who married a pedophile to be one that implemented this kind of block.

[–] CtrlAltDefeat@sh.itjust.works 13 points 5 days ago

Kids would be better off on pornhub

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 16 points 6 days ago

Sad to see France is heading this direction, Canada was very close to heading this route too, thankfully it didn't end up that way.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Tbh adult content is probrally the most respectable content you can find on X, especially compared to the constant Nazis and genocide apologetic liberals.

[–] viking@infosec.pub 1 points 5 days ago

Liberals are genocide apologists?!

[–] thisisnotmyhat@programming.dev 8 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Everyone should have content filtering tools. I use Adguard services for filtering my own internet (adult, Reddit, YouTube, etc.). Surely, implimenting something similar at an OS or router level would have saved us decades of pointless bickering and provided us with an actual consumer benefit?

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I don't know if they still do it, but some mobile internet providers in the UK would filter things out unless you sent them your ID to unblock it.

Not sure it's a great solution, but better than having to provide your ID to every random website out there.

[–] Zetta@mander.xyz 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Having to provide Id to any entity to access internet pages is dystopian and fucked up, sounds just like the UK.

Not that the USA is better at all

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 1 points 5 days ago

I think it's mostly because it's a SIM only thing and anyone can send off for one.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If you want it, that should be your right, but the government shouldn't be forcing it on you.

[–] thisisnotmyhat@programming.dev 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying governments could force MS, Google, Apple to implement content filtering tools at the OS level, that give users the choice to set up filtering however they want for themselves or their kids.

This already largely works, at least on Android. I use RethinkDNS, which allows me to filter stuff already, and comes included with a host of DNS filters out of the box.

I don't need MS, Google, or Apple to do it, just make it possible to install a third-party app that does it. That way I get to decide which tool I think works best instead of whatever the OEM decides.

[–] Geist_@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

what does that have to do with France forcing you to show your ID to use Twitter?

[–] thisisnotmyhat@programming.dev 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Those against website age verification argue that content blocking should happen at the OS level. For example, a parent could enable the built-in "child mode" on their child's smartphone or computer. As I understand it, that would be more effective, graceful, cheaper, free speechy, and private. To a degree, tech savvy parents (and people who block ads and other content) already do similar things with third party tools - i.e. it's feasible.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Sure if that was all they had in mind. This is also about collecting info and controlling what people can do, the content is just an excuse as a means of doing so.

Well, yes, there is that.

[–] Schwim@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 days ago

Everyone in France already subbed to VPNs for the pornhub block. This won't even result in a traffic hiccup.

[–] shekau@lemmy.today 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Elon probably punching air rn

[–] Pnut@lemm.ee 3 points 6 days ago

That's the only thing he's ever punched.

[–] arararagi@ani.social 1 points 5 days ago

Why is every country dreaming of becoming south korea?

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 175 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The site formerly known as Twitter would be more respectable these days if it were a porn site.

[–] Emi@ani.social 36 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's not? Thought that's the main use.

[–] SpicyColdFartChamber@lemm.ee 20 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I like my porn to be less faschy and more flashy.

[–] Darkenfolk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago

Yeah alright, but dem uniformed forms though..

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 107 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Fucking ridiculous. Might as well do the same for sites like Tumblr, Reddit, even Youtube. "Protecting" kids comes at the expense of everyone else.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 6 points 6 days ago

Won't somebody think of the children [who should be raised by their parents, not governments]?

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 135 points 1 week ago (10 children)

Its not about protecting kids, even if they say it is.

[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 55 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh, of course not. Just the given excuse. Honestly, people being so obsessed with minors jacking off is creepy. Who cares? If it's a problem, then the parents can deal with it.

As a parent, I'm with you.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Stillwater@sh.itjust.works 49 points 1 week ago

This is kind of hilarious. Right wingers seek to limit privacy by forcing age verification online, and then the right wing social network gets caught in the same net. It hurt itself in it's confusion.

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 44 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Why is anyone still on X anyway? Its AI bot trash.

[–] arararagi@ani.social 1 points 5 days ago

Because artists are still there.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›