this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2025
631 points (86.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

8088 readers
3582 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pnut@lemm.ee 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I've had the first four books in the study at my mom's house since I was a kid. My nephew and nieces will read them. We have the box set of DVDs from forever ago. Same deal. I wouldn't consider myself a die-hard fan. I still don't understand why die-hard fans could still be spending so much money on the franchise. Did they add to the books?

[–] DrivebyHaiku@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 hours ago

The short answer is it's not books. It's mostly licencing deals in the form of video games and merchandise... However HBO is about to put forward a new series that JKR will have executive control and an executive sized pay check for.

It's the "well it already exists and licencing deals are already paid, might as well watch it/play it/own it" that keeps the whole engine rolling on. Every time there's a little bit of advocacy to disengage from the fandom it is always spun as "too late" or focuses on the books or death of the author... But all that's really required is ambivalence.

Inevitably the new HP thing will come out and whether or not trans people mention anything people will drag up the controversy, use the reminder to brigade the spaces trans people connect online, try and goad their trans coworker for a commentary and set off yet another flurry of right wing backlash that makes elevating the franchise a patriotic duty to "stick it to the moralizing trans people to show them who is boss". All of this causes more cultural pressure on a population already underwater with being chased out of the public sphere but it will be framed as a just retaliation for a perceived slight.

It's a song and dance that will continue ad infinitum as long as it's profitable because appearantly nostalgia is worth turning a blind eye to the where the money goes.

[–] nintendiator@feddit.cl 4 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Sure, Karen.

I liked the (first four) movies. Honestly awesome if short Alan Rickman screentime. I pirated them. I watch hem whenever I want, not when you think I have to be a soldier for your cause, and that bitch still don't get a cent from me.

Like, sure, conveniently I won't have any spare time to rewatch them this month, but that's because life is busy not becuse you think you're right.

[–] Gabadabs@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Or you could just... watch better movies.

[–] Slovene@feddit.nl 1 points 1 hour ago

But ... Then I won't understand the memes. 😕

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world -1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

My wife's name is Karen. We have multiracial friends, gay and trans friends, and we don't demand to speak to the manager. But she has to put up with the name she received at birth being used as a lazy slang term for horribleness - which to me is one of the most hypocritical behaviors a trans person or ally can engage in. But that's just like, my opinion, man.

edit: Just checking back... yep, predictable burst of douchvotes. There are over 1.5 million people named Karen in the US alone, and you haven't met most of them, but go ahead and defend demonizing their names to object to bad behavior - how fucking enlightened!

[–] FarmTaco@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

just call her K-dawg

[–] Vinstaal0@feddit.nl 24 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

If you wanna play the game, pirate it and then play it offline.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I wasn't interested in playing it, but now I'm gonna do this out of spite.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

what are some fun trans-inclusive universes? doesn't have to be fantasy

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

Discworld explores gender a few times in a way that I like.

Monstrous Regiment is about a bunch of women who pretend to be men to join their military. For the most part - these aren’t trans characters, they identify as female. The funny is the characters slowly discovering that everyone else in their group is doing the same thing. One character though, explicitly identifies as male after the “reveal” and has male pronouns used for them.

Discworld as a series tends to be irreverent without punching down. Comedy is a weapon in Pratchett’s hands, but his targets are capitalism and oppressive systems.

LeGuin has a lot of interesting takes on gender. The Hainnish cycle is about a race of humans who had previously colonized a bunch of planets and did lots of experimentation on those populations - kinda Vault Tec vibes. The civilization collapses/gets better, and the POV character is usually some type of researcher/anthropologist looking at how those planets develop The Left Hand of Darkness is a sci fi classic: a planet where people stay sexless until they go into “heat” and will develop the opposite genitals of the person who they are attracted to. There’s lots of switching back and forth. It’s a big deal when the king gets pregnant, because only children the king carries can inherit the throne.

Any LeGuin is good. Earthsea is a far superior children’s series compared to Harry Potter. Nothing that really makes it explicitly trans but the process of finding your true name and accepting yourself is something that resonated very much with me. (Also props to LeGuin for being very forceful with insisting that the characters not be depicted as white. None of this pussyfooting retroactive “I never said Hermione was white!”)

Anne Leckie’s Imperial Radch trilogy is also more gender bending sci fi. Everyone is “she.” The first book was part of the Sad Puppies drama, because it won Hugo’s and absolutely pissed a bunch of a bunch of chuds.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Pratchett did indeed inspect gender quite a bit in the Discworld books.

It's never quite explicitly explained where Nobby Nobbs' peg fits, but it turns out he certainly prefers to wear women's clothing and is reluctant enough to change back into his male uniform at the end of Jingo that he has to be explicitly ordered to do so.

There's also Equal Rites, the very second story (and third book), which explores the notion of, "Just why can't a woman be a wizard, anyway?" (It turns out she can. And quite a powerful one, too.)

Gender is a pretty big deal to the dwarfs on the Disc, too. It's a recurring theme ever since Cheery Littlebottom is introduced in Feet of Clay.

[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 2 points 8 hours ago

I read her catwings when I was very young and it made me cry. the ending is so happy. i love her

[–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 26 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

I would love to understand why saying "Don't support cunts" is such a non-controversial statement.

Until it comes to Harry Potter.

Especially considering how simple it is to do.

[–] KAtieTot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 7 hours ago

They're basically swifties ffs.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Vari@lemm.ee 38 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I’ll never. Ever. Understand being rich enough to enjoy the rest of your life and choosing to spend that wealth harming innocent people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LordGimp@lemm.ee 12 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (4 children)

I made the same decision with Brandon Sanderson and his fuckin fanclub takes it extremely personally when I point out how problematic he is as an author.

Yes, his writing is good. Yes, his writing is remarkably inclusive with regards to sexual orientation, disability, and mental illness.

However, Brandon is a Mormon first and foremost, and actively tithes to his church. That means a significant percentage of ALL Dragonsteel profits go directly towards the suppression and disenfranchisement of LGBTQ+ programs, sex education, and effective mental health services.

He might write a good story, but his IRL politics are repugnant.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Oh, when you brought him up I was worried he had actively done something bad. But no, you just don't like that he's Mormon, that's literally your only gripe.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Financially supporting the harming and oppression of others is a problem, no matter how it's labelled. I think it's completely fair to call that out.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

So how many degrees of separation are necessary for your morals? Because unless you grow your own food, weave your own cloth, make everything you own yourself, and consume no media; I can pretty much guarantee there are things you have spent money or time on that contribute to groups or individuals that you find reprehensible.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

That is some very intense False Equivalence you are brandishing.

[–] LordGimp@lemm.ee 3 points 2 hours ago

Funnily enough, ignorance is a valid excuse here. You can't be expected to investigate the companies behind every single product you buy or use in the day to day, but that's not what were talking about here.

We're talking about Brandon Sanderson, specifically, and how his tithes to the Mormon church significantly contribute to the open oppression and abuse of LGBTQIA+ communities. You, buying your mistborn and stormlight archive books, are DIRECTLY supporting that behavior.

[–] LordGimp@lemm.ee 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Every time he tithes to that house of abuse and oppression, he IS actively doing something bad. Is that not enough for you?

[–] syreus@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago

No. And his books are good.

He tithes and hopes those funds go toward the good things the church accomplishes.

He has a lot of explanation on his relationship with the church and his stance on not allowing his religion to negatively affect his writing.

He has consistently advocated for lesser know authors and fought against Amazon to improve conditions for them.

His books are full of LGBTQIA+, neurodiverse people, women passing the bechdel test, and irl cultural inspiration from around the world.

He actually hires people to consult on things like schizophrenia so he doesn't promote misinformation.

The thing you are asking him to do is abandon his community. Instead he works to better it from the inside. He is a lecturer at BYU and is directly exposed to the future leaders of that church. Let him cook.

So yeah I don't like his religion's track record but anyone who has investigated the guy can see he's a fair author and the criticism is hyperbole.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 7 points 9 hours ago

No different than Rowling in that regard. Giving money for others to actively do something bad is also bad. You don't get to launder your shit politics by paying someone to do the dirty work and it doesn't absolve you of those politics.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›