this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2025
656 points (98.7% liked)

/r/50501 Mirror

1120 readers
1019 users here now


Mirrored /r/50501 Popular Posts


founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Originally Posted By u/Kitedo At 2025-06-14 04:50:59 PM | Source


top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

So now they're being very open about it, Good. Document this so that they can't get away with it

[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 35 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Oh no, this is really bad, we need to write a strongly worded letter"

-The Good Place Committee

yeh the first time i watched that show i was like "oh my god theyre democrats!" and its only gotten truer

[–] selkiesidhe@lemm.ee 19 points 1 day ago

Fuck off, fascist!!! 🖕🤬🖕

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We cannot let the Republican party stand after the dusts settles. It is tainted, planted over the bones of white supremacy and watered with hate.

Force them to set down new grassroots by banning every Republican politician from office that manages to escape prison.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

today on sesame street: gang wars edition, we're going to learn about power vacuums!

if you have a large population that supports a particular group or person and get rid of that group or person, a vacuum will form that sucks all that support with new hostility into a new group or person, usually they are worse than the original.

the best way to combat this is to replace existing leadership with leaders who are sympathetic to your goals and will lead the vacant minded masses to the agreed upon goal.

the US has done this hundreds of times in history with great success.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

the best way to combat this is to replace existing leadership with leaders who are sympathetic to your goals and will lead the vacant minded masses to the agreed upon goal.

That's what neocons were until the Tea Party purged them.

The problem is that the Democrat leadership wants the old GOP back so they can get back to ending history. We can't tolerate either party in their present forms.

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

The power vacuum exists when the power is left sitting at the table. Presumably, in my utopic wish to disenfranchise fascists, we'd fix the guiderails that let us fly off into this canyon but I didn't get into that in the midst of my angry diatribe.

[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 169 points 2 days ago (2 children)

That's a literal death threat. Fuck that guy. Maybe he'd like to experience the same next time he votes against a Democrat? Or maybe, we just don't do political assassinations.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago

Nah, this type of cretin deserves only what they salivate over dolling on others. He deserves it. Completely. Literal psychopath throwing threats.

[–] sqgl@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

~~No it isn't. See the tweet in context.~~ https://sh.itjust.works/comment/19206531

Edit: Hmmm that tweet is dodgy AF. It really is a death threat which is disguised as Dems killing their own. Doesn't reveal that the killer was a Republican.

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 121 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'm going to paste in part of my comment on another thread:

Something important to know about the two people who were shot: until her death, Melissa Hortman was a member of the Minnesota State House of Representatives; and John Hoffman is a member of the Minnesota State Senate. Both were Democrats.

And up until they were shot, the Minnesota House had 134 Members: 66 Republicans vs 67 Democrats (with one seat empty to be filled later). And the Minnesota Senate had 67 members: 33 Republicans and 34 Democrats. If the assassinations had both been successful, both chambers would have been tied. As it is, they're only saying that Hoffman is "stable", but there are no further details.

Luckily, in this case, nothing fascist is gonna get passed through the Governor's veto. It's just a momentary delay in passing laws until a replacement can be elected in the next special election.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Is it not in the US that the house is seen as full of seats and these are tied to a party? Surely it's not that they're tied to a person, lest a drunk driver could shift the entire political landscape. I imagine the party refills the seat.

[–] camr_on@lemmy.world 48 points 2 days ago

They are tied to the person, not party.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 days ago

To add to what the others said; it depends on the state but typically in this situation it would be up to the governor to appoint a replacement. Whether or not that person has to be from the same party, serves the rest of the term or is just temporary, or if there needs to be a special election will also vary by state as well.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I imagine the party refills the seat

Political parties do not have direct granted power or authority in any state or federal position. They are not officially part of the election process. They organize and group candidates, and spend millions on advertising but they aren't directly granted any power. States will run primary elections to assist parties in selecting a candidate to proceed to the general election, but the process the party uses is ultimately up to them for determining the name they want to submit for the general election. Neither of the current two major parties existed when the US was founded, and originally there were several others. The actual general election process doesn't care about parties at all. Our system has inevitably devolved into the two party system we have now because of the Electoral College process.

In most States, replacing a State legislator is done via a Special Election, and stays vacant until then. A quick Google search seems to show that is the case for Minnesota. So if that district doesn't solidly vote D, it will be up for grabs. On this current political climate right now, I'm not sure that it would shift R.

On the federal level the State Governor would appoint someone to the Congress/Senate until the next election. Depending on the State laws, because States control their own election process, they may not be required by law to appoint someone from the same party.

In a deeply divided political climate like this, forcing both the legislature and Senate into a tie can effectively shutdown the government. Which is great for a party with a goal of trying to obstruct any progress.

[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Wait till you hear about the supreme court. They could just get one of their cultists to murder the 6 non-trump judges and fascists will control the entirety of the courts by appointing their replacements.

Edit: Actually, the courts are already 5-4/4-5 split most of the time in recwnt years, just muder 1 liberal judge and democracy is effectively over.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 43 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

And also tries to use an (AI-generated?) prompt answer in an attempt to call dissenting commenters an ablist slur and prove that he definitely didn't make any threats of violence with his statement clearly implying that people who voted against his party of choice have their "li[ves] at stake".

https://xcancel.com/AlecLace/status/1933983687864913980#m

Real fucking class act this fascist shitheel is.

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So this is actually him implying that Tim Walz ordered the assassination because Melissa Hortman voted against healthcare for undocumented migrants. Not the threat that it sounds like without context, but orders of magnitude more stupid. These people live in an entirely different reality.

[–] sqgl@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yes he implies that with ambiguous language as a way of weaseling out of the legality of threatening violence.

[–] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 78 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The brownshirts are being activated. They’ll inspire more domestic terrorism, and they’ll stop facing any consequences. It’s a speedrun to fascism.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago (4 children)

After today's protests, they will be pressing the pedal harder. Do NOT give in! We fight back.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 68 points 2 days ago

It is called stochastic terrorism and this shitbag should be locked up

[–] subignition@fedia.io 53 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm no lawyer, but I feel like this statement is really toeing the first amendment line https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seditious_libel#Seditious_speech_in_the_United_States

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago

As Dennis would say

They are referencing two murders and two attempted already and stating there will be more, this is far beyond that line

[–] IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Has trump pardoned this murderer yet?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Draegur@lemmy.zip 32 points 2 days ago (3 children)

we protest peacefully

they murder us

i am not hopeful.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Peaceful protests work. Plenty of people protesting today cited that their main motivation was violence against peaceful protesters. People do not like that, and this injustice tends to form a greater coalition.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The feeling is becoming mutual. If the GOP keeps it up, reprisals will happen.

[–] Ironfist79@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The Balkanization of the US is well underway.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

1000001651

has been since 2008.

[–] Zenith@lemm.ee 20 points 2 days ago

Uh?????? What the actual fuck??? I guess throw it on the pile

[–] Alpha71@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

why would I care what a failed podcaster thinks?

[–] el_bhm@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago

Because he is a fascist with an audience. Little Goebels.

What needs to happen is some led flying over his head. Or bricks to his face. Windows. Molotov his house.

He wants violence? Serve it to him.

Cries wolf? Serve more violence.

Serve violence until he stops.

Why? Because this is what he salivates for for everyone else.

As a fellow Yuropean from eastern block.

DO NOT IGNORE MEDIA FASCITS

[–] Cosmiss@beehaw.org 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So apparently this is in reply to another tweet of his where he accused it of possibly being a hit from Walz and that is you don't vote with Democrats, then Democrats will kill you. Still completely unhinged, but the context changes the meaning of this tweet.

The image comes from a reply in the reddit comments.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Godofdirt@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

Well murder goes both ways

[–] Tuxman@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

To be fair… I wouldn’t really shed a tear if some of them became messages to other republicans… so I guess that’s where the country stands right now.

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago

My only question is; Did they support the oIigarchy and/or fac!sm?

I haven't looked at recent numbers but Minnesota was leading in kidnappings by far.

That said, I know nothing about these two and it's possible this happened because they were the only ones resisting.

load more comments
view more: next ›