this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
1044 points (97.4% liked)

People Twitter

7449 readers
1294 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archived Post

https://archive.ph/vzrga

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rpa@europe.pub 34 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I remember all it took was some jizz...

[–] KingJalopy@lemm.ee 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Now we have an actual cum stain running this shit show

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Derpenheim@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 day ago

Only impeachment that will matter is a vigilante with better aim

[–] Jhuskindle@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Can anyone explain what happened to the articles of impeachment that were introduced a few months ago?

[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

impeachment shmimshmeashment, i want a conviction and an escort out of the building

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Not happening. Next quotum

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 day ago

Lol, no it isn't. Ever since Cold War times, the law has been that the president can not only launch missiles, but even deploy troops on the ground, without congressional approval. There's a limit on how long the troops can be deployed, iirc, but once you've started a ground invasion it's a bit late.

Obviously it's unconstitutional, but there's no legal precedent that would say so. If you think this is the first time this has happened, you really need to learn more about history. The US never formally declared war on Vietnam, for example.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

The problems, the House and Senate are controlled by the Russian supporting MAGA clowns. I believe Mango Mussolini has a 60 day window before he needs to end the military engagement against Iran. For the moment, a drunk, a felon and Signal App are controlling the US military.

[–] iamjackflack@lemm.ee 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Isn't the president allowed 90 days before congress is required?

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Yes, also he didn't declare war. Anyone old enough to remember 9-11 knows what is up.

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

They're coming right at us, Jimbo!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 8 points 1 day ago (5 children)

not with the house in the hands of republicans.

Best hope there is enough democracy left in the US to swing it back to the Dems in 2026.

And even then, without a comfortable majority for the Dems in the senate it will just be another impeachment to add to the pile, no conviction.

They don't call him teflon don for no reason

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Can we impeach him out of a cannon?

Into the sun?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] EverXIII@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

A sraight jacket would be a better solution.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I havent seen the Dems fight for much of anything in a long time. I highly doubt they'd do whats needed to make an impeachment happen.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago

Because the last two impeachments were a resounding success?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›