this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2025
807 points (97.9% liked)

Greentext

6710 readers
1822 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago

Meme creator is clearly blind.

[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The Finals uses rxgti and the only difference between raytracing off and on is the speed at which the lighting changes within a scene.

I see little benefit from raytracing in many games. And would prefer the implementation be used in other games.

[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I haven't played the finals myself but as of the pre-release version when I watched a video about it lighting didn't update at all without raytracing enabled. It is pretty hard to get any sort of dynamic lighting without raytracing. If not impossible, depending on how you define raytracing. But basically if they have a dynamic lighting feature that works without 'raytracing' they have to create a whole other GI system using world-space probes and maybe even dynamically voxeliIng the entire scene. Neither of which are easy on performance, but usually not as bad as normal hardware RT and restir. Neither of those are good at reflections or fine detail, which is why games that want to look better than that usually switch to doing it the normal way.

[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think they're using the SHaRC implementation in RXGI for when you disable raytracing.

They're forthcoming about using rxgi. That said it does work very well even on non-raytracing capable hardware.

[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

It says on that page that SHaRC requires raytracing capable hardware. I guess they could be modifying it to use their own software raytracing implementation. In any case it's the exact same math for either hardware or software raytracing, hardware is just a bit faster. Unless you do what lumen did and use a voxel scene for software raytracing.

[–] unknown1234_5@kbin.earth 1 points 1 week ago

never got the point of raytracing. screen space reflections look the same and save so much performance.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›