this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2025
156 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

71800 readers
4228 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

Similar to other apps, CoverDrop only provides limited protection on smartphones that are fully compromised by malware, e.g., Pegasus, which can record the screen content and user actions.

[–] Mynameisallen@lemmy.zip 19 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I saw the headline and was ready to rage about why they should just use signal instead. Then I read the article and honestly this is a fucking genius use of tech

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (3 children)

I read it and don't understand. Why is this better than Signal? Or the 500 other secure file/messaging protocols?

Jabber seemed to work perfectly for Snowden...

[–] Mynameisallen@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 minutes ago

For one, ease of access. Say you’re trying to break a story, who are you going to message with signal? Because you’re going to need to get that contact info somehow right?

Snowden is permanently stranded in Russia. That’s not exactly a great example of an anonymous source.

[–] rosco385@lemmy.wtf 15 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Because analysing network traffic wouldn't allow an adversary to see what you're sending with Signal, but they could still tell you're sendig a secure message.

What the Guardian is doing is hiding that secure chat traffic inside the Guardian app, so packet sniffing would only show you're accessing news.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 hours ago

I downloaded the guardian app and couldn't find the option.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

analysing network traffic wouldn't allow an adversary to see what you're sending with Signal

How are they analyzing network traffic with Signal? It's encrypted. And why does it matter if they know you're sending a message? Literally everyone using Signal is sending a message.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Using an encrypted messaging app could itself be a red flag, using a news app is normal behavior.

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Timing of messages. They can't tell what you send, but can tell when

[–] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago

Messaging protocols already resemble the frameworks that come out from time to time. And their effectiveness is due to the fact that they require a certain quota of users.

It's just a secure messaging app with a direct line to Guardian journalists. How to use 911 or special numbers when you're not feeling well.

[–] hera@feddit.uk 23 points 13 hours ago

Love seeing open source projects from companies that aren't specifically tech firms

Horrible name sadly