this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
680 points (95.8% liked)

me_irl

6317 readers
1490 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 2 points 32 minutes ago* (last edited 32 minutes ago)

I'm exactly like that, but the other way around. 90 % of the movies I watch I don't enjoy. Mayhap it's just not my medium. Makes the 10 % I did enjoy realy worth it tough.

[–] kepix@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago

dude is stuck at a toddler level

[–] Ougie@lemmy.world 0 points 51 minutes ago

With the same logic there's no good food and bad food, might as well eat mud if it makes hunger go away. Drink your piss, yay thirst gone! Live under bridge, yay no rain! Work 60 hour weeks get minimum wage, yay you're contributing to society woohoo

Good rage bait tweet, twat. You got me.

[–] wuphysics87@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 hours ago

I 100% get this and I think a lot of people are missing the point. It's like going to a football game without knowing the rules, which team is better, or who is winning and having fun anyway. It's not having fun watching people suck because shitty football can be funny.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 13 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Movies can be fun bad tbh. They can have cheap budgets, horribly low quality CGI, but still be a fun watch.

[–] wuphysics87@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 hours ago

Yea but this is telling the difference beyween a good and bad movie

[–] Fillicia@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Modern comedies have nothing on movies like asteroid-a-geddon, the shark side of the moon, or even the velocipastor.

Those movies slaps and are a guaranteed laugh!

[–] DJDarren@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 hours ago

Valocipastor is a bona fide masterpiece. Quietly confident that the sequel will also be fun.

[–] Gronk@aussie.zone 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Mario Bros. Dune.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 18 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Good movie: the one you enjoy

Bad movie: the one you don't

Simple as that, my metric of scoring isn't good or bad, it's whether i enjoy it or whether it annoy me. I pick what i watch and will go through review and score so most of the time i know i gonna enjoy it, but sometime an outlier will pops up. I'm still not over how annoyed i am for 28 Weeks Later.

[–] Senal@programming.dev 6 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

That assumes that enjoyment is the only metric, which is common, but not universal.

Some people can think the movie is of high quality, but the subject matter isn't for them, as an example.

Think of it like food:

Good food: the food you enjoy

Bad food: the food you don’t

Unless you're basing good and bad on how "healthy" the food is (for whatever given metric of health you want to use)

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 2 points 8 minutes ago

What you're saying makes sense except that's not what OOP was talking about. They weren't asking what definition of "quality" to use.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

And that assuming "enjoyment" is a single metric, because in the matter of fact, it's an overall score with the combination of everything the critics use. If i like it i like it, figuring it out why and justify it is part of the critics job.

If you wanna translate that into food, then the good food will taste good and bad food will taste horrible.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago

Yeah. Nobody enjoys watching Requiem for a Dream or Schindler’s List, they’re still top films.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

I mean hey, if you have low standards, and you're completely honest about it, nothing wrong with that... and it also puts the onus on the people with higher standards to actually explain why they do or do not like any given movie, easier to suss out the people who don't actually have consistent standards, but instead just have an amalgamation of their favorite influencers opinions.

Win win win as I see it. I'm a bit of a movie snob, and I can explain why I do or don't like a movie...

But I am also self-aware enough to realize that other people have other standards, and 90% of the time, if there isn't some utterly reprehnsible trope or caricature or very very misleading depiction of real events in a 'based on a true story' type thing... eh, whatever, we have different tastes, wanna get pizza?

[–] 50shadesofautism@lemmy.zip 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I have a friend who can rant for hours about why he hates Rian Johnson and what he did go starters. I think all the movies are good, the first 6 for sure huge nostalgia but I like the newer ones too.

[–] Muaddib@sopuli.xyz 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Knives Out is a great movie

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago

Brick is a masterpiece

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Dude just watch the room and you will get it

[–] rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works 23 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Sounds like 10% of the time you did not have fun watching a movie. That's a bad movie.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 16 points 11 hours ago (5 children)

Sometimes bad movies are fun to watch.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 minutes ago

Yes if you change the definition of "bad", but there's a name for that logical fallacy.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 4 points 8 hours ago

Madame Web was actually so fun to hate watch. Take a shot every time she opens a soda.

SpoilerThere are two scenes where she holds a can of soda but doesn't open them. She keeps almost opening them but never quite does. It's hilarious.

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (5 children)

'So bad it's good' is one of my favorites. But you have to be prepared going into it. If you start a 'so bad it's good' film wanting something decent, you'll be disappointed. If you go in planning to enjoy the terrible, ridiculous, and ridiculous and/or banality, you'll probably enjoy it. If that's your thing.

My favorites of this genre are 'Hobo with a shotgun', 'Dead Snow' (sequel is actually good), and 'rubber'.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago

Wasn’t Hobo with a Shotgun deliberately made as a “bad” film?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 7 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I did a Final Destination marathon recently to prep for Bloodlines.
While all the movies have their flaws and weaknesses, FD4 was garbage. Even as a easy to please person I couldn't handle it.

Genuinely terrible, I am shocked they wanted it to be the last one in the franchise, to the point they called it "The Final Destination"

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 41 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Must be nice to be able to just completely switch off your brain like that.

[–] stebo02@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 hours ago
[–] copdeb@crazypeople.online 1 points 5 hours ago

I get you bro

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 61 points 14 hours ago (7 children)

Me enjoying a movie does in no way exclude it from being a bad movie.

Seeing as I do enjoy watching bad movies. Terrible acting, bad cuts, awful dialog. I love it.

[–] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

This is why I love Nicolas Cage films. But they're intentionally bad, campy and corny as an anti style.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 145 points 16 hours ago (28 children)

Whether you had fun and the quality of the movie are not entirely related.

load more comments (28 replies)
[–] Ceedoestrees@lemmy.world 33 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (8 children)

Good movies are self-aware. Not everything needs to be a masterpiece of acting and cinematography, or have the best effects, or the best writing. But they have to know what they are. I don't mean breaking the fourth wall or self-deprecating humor. More like understanding their limits.

The people making Sharknado knew they were doing a campy action film (series) with sharks in tornadoes. Fun Movie. Would watch again.

M. Night Shyamalan is a great writer and director, but a lot of his films have a feeling of over-dramatized self-importance, where it seems like he really wants you to know how clever he is. So they get panned.

Chrisopher Nolan (I think) puts similar importance on symbols and archetypes with a dramatic and artistic style, but his movies have a feel of like "I don't give a shit if you get it, just enjoy the ride." He makes good films.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Sometimes, it's more important that you enjoy the thing than the thing being objectively good. There is merit to objectively analyzing things, and there can be enjoyment found in doing so. There is also merit to just enjoying the thing you like. Both are valid.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›