I never understood how transactions were supposed to be anonymous if every single one ever made was recorded on the blockchain. The argument a long time ago seemed to be that the sheer volume of transactions would make it impossible to reasonably handle, but in the past couple years I’ve seen more and more stories where the FBI has tools that let them trace transactions and use them in arrests of people engaged in crimes that have netted millions of dollars. Maybe right now it’s still only worth doing on major crimes, but I assume it will only get easier and more available with time.
this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2025
10 points (100.0% liked)
Pulse of Truth
1234 readers
66 users here now
Cyber Security news and links to cyber security stories that could make you go hmmm. The content is exactly as it is consumed through RSS feeds and wont be edited (except for the occasional encoding errors).
This community is automagically fed by an instance of Dittybopper.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
10
FBI used bitcoin wallet records to peg notorious IntelBroker as UK national
(www.theregister.com)
Bitcoin is not anonymous, it's pseudonymous.
Pseudonymous: the semi-anonymous nature of transactions and wallet addresses.
I believe Monero is supposed to be anonymous. not sure what other crypto out there has this property.