this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2025
1578 points (97.3% liked)

Political Memes

8799 readers
2617 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Draegur@lemmy.zip 235 points 1 week ago (19 children)

If they're not with Zohran, they're against Democracy.

I mean this is kind of obvious at this point that the democrats and the republicans are both anti-democracy, just one covertly and the other overtly. But still. I want more people getting loud and angry at anti-democracy democrats.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 75 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I mean at this rate with about %70 of democrats saying no to Bernie's stop arm sales motions, we can already safely assume yes they are. They have only been caring about their seats for quite a while and the deals they have made to stay on those seats do not align with the aims and interests of people like Bernie and Zohran. That is why they try to stop such candidates as ferociously as Republicans.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] EightBitBlood@lemmy.world 152 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Don't forget Bernie.

DNC had the same exact response. With the same exact Trump.

Took the DNC ten fucking years to pull their head out of their ass long enough to complain about young men populism being the key to victory, despite literally pissing away all the young men populism voters they had with Bernie Sanders.

Thank fuck it's now blatantly obvious with Zohran.

[–] derry@midwest.social 28 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I'm not confident they will get it this time. Or care

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean really they don't, I'm pretty sure 180 just voted against the impeachment of Trump. Literally just waiting to see which shill geriatric they'll put up for 2028 and pull the same "vote for us or suffer Republicans" bs for the next election.

I keep saying that if progressives in the DNC are being constantly blocked and cheated out of power, they need to split off and make their own party. They're afraid that if they do, they'll lose a majority against Republicans, but that's already true because even bargain basement protection laws barely pass when the Dems do have a majority in congress, and they actively support bs Republican bills when a minority like right now.

Splitting would render the DNC useless and simultaneously tap into the huge block of nonvoters that would turnout like how Mamdani's voter base was largely a grassroots campaign.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 126 points 1 week ago (3 children)

So funny to see in real time the difference between their phony outrage over Trump’s arguably monstrous policies, VS their genuine fear over a socialist winning a mayoral race.

This is why everyone who claims the way to fix Dems is via primaries is wrong. Dems will lie, cheat, or simply not hold primaries altogether, rather than risk an actual leftist winning the nomination.

[–] sturger@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Now watch as Dems throw their support behind the independent in order to undermine Zohran.

[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] mikezeman@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Your source indicates he is still running, but unless I'm missing something makes no mention of endorsements. Do you have a source for that?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago

Theres like 2 people in the DNC who have voiced dislike of Zohran, and they're getting fucking roasted on social media for it.

Zohran Mamdani is a Democrat. He is the DNC candidate. Vote for the DNC, vote for Zohran Mamdani.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I still think we should support those that do primary if just to show the flippant double standards.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] grte@lemmy.ca 105 points 1 week ago (14 children)

I wonder what all the people who shamed 3rd party voters will say if establishment Democrats start throwing their support behind an independent Cuomo.

[–] octopus_ink@slrpnk.net 67 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

This one would say all the things Harris would have done wrong are still better than all the things Trump is doing wrong. I'm not and have not been a fan of Harris. She's still not Trump.

Edit: While I actually did not truly shame anyone for their vote (I hope) it was always true that third party vote was going to help Trump get in, and I do think folks shouldn’t pretend it wasn’t true. If you are going to make a principled vote in the name of sending a message, I think it’s only reasonable to be honest about the effects of that decision.

[–] srecko@lemm.ee 28 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I'm not from US, but why not ask for something more than lesser of two evils?

[–] octopus_ink@slrpnk.net 46 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because that's what we were given to choose from.

Insert long, tired diatribe about FPTP voting and the US two party system here.

TL;DR: Third party votes were effectively a vote for Trump. And while I actually did not truly shame anyone for their vote (I hope) this was always true, and I do think folks shouldn't pretend it wasn't true. If you are going to make a principled vote in the name of sending a message, I think it's only reasonable to be honest about the effects of that decision.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Logically, third party votes were only "effectively a vote for Trump" if you assume that otherwise all of them would be votes for the Democrat Party AND that the Democrats could not possibly win without those people sacrificing their vote to a party that doesn't represent them (i.e. that it would be impossible for the Democrats to appeal to those voters the way politicians are supposed to, by supporting policies that those voters wanted).

As an outsider, it's painfully obvious that the Democrat Party establishment strategy was to try and get those votes without trying to appeal to those voters using the exactly Propaganda you're still now parroting, and it failed miserably.

They tried to cheat at representative politics (by wanting the votes without offering representation) and failed (worse, failed when their adversary was a loudmouth buffoon), but you're blaming those who wouldn't vote for those who did not at all want to represent them.

Interestingly, Zohran is starting to show that the strategy of appealing to such voters is a winning strategy (in other words that the Democrat Party establishment did not won because of their refusal to represent in any way left of center voters), a proof which will become undeniable if the NY Mayoral race ends up as a three horse race with him, Cuomo and a Republican and he wins.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 week ago

If they aren't on the ballot nationally, its too late.

[–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 1 week ago

Because the system is specifically designed to prevent that from happening.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That only works when running for president. Running third party in every other election is what we should be doing. Bernie Sanders is a independent. He preached on that but nobody fucking listens. Instead they think we can fix the Democratic Party (we can't) Like police reform can't be done.

You have to build something NEW from the ground up. Why every local election we should be running candidates with a new party. One that actually stands for the people. Once we take over all the states. Then and only then do we run for president.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 week ago

I say Democrats should be reformed in the primary, voted for in the election. The time to support Mamdani as a Democrat is now. (Billionaires like Ackman, Bloomberg aren't real Republicans or Democrats anyway, they just have a lot of money and they want to back a horse that will let them keep it). The time to bring about a change in Democratic candidates ahead of the midterms (if they happen) and next general is now. In 2~4 years, it will then be time to vote in whoever's been put forward as the best chance to stop fascism.

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 16 points 1 week ago

Schumer already did a kind of shy endorsement of Mamdani, after that the others politicians don't have much room to stab the party in the back. The problem here are the donors; oligarchs are pissed.

My current bet would be that Cuomo will leave his name in the ballot out of spite but not really campaign, and lots of right wing Democrats will stay silent, while the oligarchs will try to resurrect Adams' political career by throwing money at it (may all their donations burn into a pile of useless ash)

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] FriskyDingo@sh.itjust.works 74 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's funny how hot Gillibrand got over Zohran, but hasn't really said a peep in the last 5ish months of all... this.

It's certainly curious.

[–] Auntievenim@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I like how she just invented her own hysterical interpretation of the interview where zohran wouldn't condemn people for saying globalize the intifada, and then when confronted with the actual quote from zohran, including the "I won't become mayor to be the word police," and she takes that and says "actually, you DO have to be word police, you have to tell people its unacceptable to say things that other people may interpret as calling for the slaughter of millions of jews, even if you know those phrases mean something completely different from how jews feel about it"

The interviewer at that point is like well he didn't say that and what he said doesn't imply the killing of jews but okay youre clearly just a violently racist woman so lets take a question from a caller and end the interview

I hope she resigns if he wins, if not then her next election should be her last. Disgusting, hateful, disqualifying behavior from this woman in that interview.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Truthtwopower@lemmy.zip 65 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Bought and paid for and unwilling to lose their power at any cost it seems.

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

Most of the people we're talking about are either members of the house or senate in our federal government. And our current system makes it very difficult to win or keep those specific seats unless you're willing to be bought and paid for. Those who don't do as they're told will get primaried by an opponent who is much better funded. It is a system that is specifically set up to choose corrupt politicians.

We desperately need campaign finance reform, but none of those politicians who are bought and paid for are going to honestly support it. Realistically, I don't see any way that we'll see it unless there is an overwhelming popular sentiment in favor of it. Where everybody is truly upset about it and politicians' hands are forced out of fear. But I don't see that happening in America any time soon, when half the country is voting Republican.

[–] freewheel@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 week ago (4 children)

For some of us, the 2016 Democratic primary was quite illuminating. I'm glad to see people are catching up finally.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 43 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The Democratic Party are not friends to the people. They get rich being the opposition party and will only do the bare minimum necessary to get you to not vote the monsters back in, which is one of the reasons far-right parties are getting a draw world-wide when the alternative is neoliberalism.

We have to force radical change (the no brainer stuff like social safety nets, massive justice reform, and massive election reform).

The Sword of Damocles is twofold: the revolution of the people, and the wrath of rival dictators. And it's not to be blunted, but to keep our officials serving the public rather than their own private interests.

🧵⚔

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago (7 children)

It's fun watching you kids realize that the Democratic party isn't the place to go for real change. I was there after Kucinich lost the primary in 2000 and then when Gore gave up fighting for his votes.

Also: You have to vote for them no matter how much you hate them. If Fetterman wins his primary next time I MUST vote for him or I am letting Republicans win.

As opposed to Chuck Schumer who also lets Republicans win.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] foggianism@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (4 children)

the Dems are in cahoots with the same elite that are in cahoots with the Reps. the dems and reps pretend to be on opposite ends of a spectrum, but they are both sucking up to capitalists and their corporations

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 1 week ago
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

Only one is an actual threat to how the Democrats do things.

[–] Cattail@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

we shall destroy the democratic party and rebuild it in our image

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] itspatato@lemm.ee 23 points 1 week ago

DNC=Divide N Conquer

[–] WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social 23 points 1 week ago (4 children)

But Republicans and Democrats are completely different parties.

/s

Don't worry, I'm sure that if moderate Democrats succeed in their rabid crusade against Zohran and he gets defeated then they'll turn around and say it was because we didn't back Cuomo 1000% and without criticism, going back through your comment history and quoting this comment back to you every time you share any political opinion whatsoever.

But they're super serious about opposing Trump, pinky promise.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 19 points 1 week ago

The democrats have been like this since at least Clinton.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Trump barely beat Harris.

Cuomo got crushed in this primary.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] aaron@infosec.pub 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (10 children)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Um, "fighting" Donald Trump.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Donald Trump is useful to the real power.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›