this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2025
91 points (81.8% liked)

Showerthoughts

35735 readers
1390 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Karl@programming.dev 2 points 54 minutes ago

The more I think about it, the more I realise how less I understand this word.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I think it's weird that people even have beliefs. Belief is a dirty word to me.

[–] DominatorX1@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 hour ago

I'm inclined to agree.

[–] Hackworth@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Belief is a tool for achieving effects; it is not an end in itself. -Peter J. Carroll

[–] DominatorX1@thelemmy.club -5 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Ah quoting. All of the authority with none of the responsibility.

[–] bitcrafter@programming.dev 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Good writers borrow, great writers steal. -T.S. Elliot

[–] DominatorX1@thelemmy.club -4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Neither of which is the act of quoting.

[–] bitcrafter@programming.dev 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

On the contrary, quoting is exactly the act of borrowing another's idea, but doing the courtesy of giving credit to the person from whom you borrowed it.

[–] DominatorX1@thelemmy.club -1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

On the contrary

A borrowed idea stands on utility.

A quote stands on authority.

[–] bitcrafter@programming.dev 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I was definitely not standing on the authority of Elliott, merely making use of his words and crediting him for it, so you are simply wrong.

[–] DominatorX1@thelemmy.club 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

You are totally standing on that famous name.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 minutes ago

I'm laying down actually

[–] Hackworth@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago

Choose another tool.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I believe in science. I believe in justice, equality, and freedom. I believe fascism and capitalism is detrimental to humanity.

I do not believe in ghosts. I do not believe in gods, angels or demons. I don't believe in an afterlife. And I don't believe corporations are people.

[–] hedge_lord@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

I do not believe in doors. Does that mean that I think that they should not exist or that I think that they do not exist? Yes actually!

[–] Walop@sopuli.xyz 12 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Because as Terry Pratchett astutely notes in the Hogfather belief is what makes the human society possible. We invented justice, mercy, duty, laws, money etc. They exist only because we believe in them. Some beliefs make the world better, other ones worse, and we should try to emphasize the former and minimize the latter.

[–] DominatorX1@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Ok. So there's benefit there as long as the believing is controlled.

Is there a general benefit or liability to believing? What do we gain and lose simply by believing, no matter what the belief?

[–] waz@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Read the book Sapiens.

Being able to believe in fiction is what allows humanity to function.

[–] DominatorX1@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 hour ago

Eeeee, interesting. I'll check that out.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They do indeed.

My parents are deeply religious, but have never figured out that it's my siblings and I who actually answer their prayers.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

God sent you to them. It was their reward for rubbing their genitals together. Thank you heavenly Father!!

[–] PoastRotato@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago (21 children)

Yeah, of course they do. They literally form the cornerstone of your worldview. If you change someone's beliefs, you change how they see the world. That sounds pretty damn big and important.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] orbitz@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

I always liked the line in Dogma about them, don't turn ideas into beliefs, you can change ideas easier than beliefs. Paraphrased and I understand how much it waters down the whole problem but I still thought the idea of it was nice. Listen and be open, you shouldn't always need to be rigid. Though mean there are still ideals I'm rigid about, respect, compassion and such. Though I always thought the idea was you thought about what worked best for everyone not just what people said you should do cause tradition.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

Belief isn't inherently bad you can believe in observational facts. It's faith that's dangerous. Any system that requires you to maintain beliefs without observable facts or in the face of negative confirmational facts is a problem.

[–] spunow@lemmy.myserv.one 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

My dogma defines my in-group, and my in-group can’t be wrong because then that would mean that I am wrong, which I categorically can’t be. And even if I was wrong, then I would no longer be part of my in-group. Therefore, your science and logic and proof must be wrong if it contradicts my dogma.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›