this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2025
273 points (99.3% liked)

politics

24849 readers
2166 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

First, approximately 1,000 personnel in the Information Management Division (IMD) and the FBI New York Field Office were assigned to this task, confirming the whistleblower account made to Senator Durbin’s office. I can also confirm that a log exists tracking the mentions of Donald Trump in the files, and that there were approximately 100,000 files containing roughly 300,000 pages. Individual analysts were told to flag mentions of Trump by document and page number by logging them in an Excel spreadsheet, then they’d hand in their spreadsheet at the end of their (sometimes 24 or even 48-hour) shift. But it’s important to note that the agents were not told to flag Trump until later in a process that began mid-March.


But there is a log of instances Donald Trump is mentioned in the files, there are video and PDF trainings instructing analysts to flag Trump, there were multiple instances of Trump appearing in the files, Patel and Bondi wanted victim information and PII, and sloppiness means that more people than previously known had access to the Epstein and Maxwell files. And while there was no indication of a ready-made, A to Z client list beyond the little black book that’s already public, “to say there’s nothing or to say it’s a hoax? Bullshit.”

all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Dick Durbin sounds like a porn actor's name

[–] notsure@fedia.io 25 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

...call the reps, if they push you off, question why?....one of my senators has started blocking my number...

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

oof, a list of times you called re: pedos in gov correlated with their voting record would make a fantastic campaign ad for anyone primarying these fucks.

"representative fuckhead, I called your office on 1,2,4,5,7,8, 10 july etc., hoping to speak to you about your misguided defence of sex offenders in our government. You refused to speak to me. So I'm gonna vote for (opposition) instead."

that'd be unffffff satisfying

[–] notsure@fedia.io 7 points 22 hours ago

...nope, apparently these folks hate getting called to do their job...

[–] womjunru@lemmy.cafe 32 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Any person assisting in a coverup should be tried for treason

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Treason has a specific legal definition and this is not it. Conspiracy to obstruct justice, evidence tampering, and I'm sure others, but not treason.

Though one would hope that at least one out of the thousand plus FBI employees involved would be honest and decent enough to leak what Trump and his cronies are trying to hide though.

[–] womjunru@lemmy.cafe 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Donald Trump, and no doubt various other political figures, have been fucking children. That information is being used to control them. Let’s just say it’s by Russia, because that’s a fun one. Anybody who helps cover that up is assisting a foreign government. I’m pretty sure that could be argued as treason

[–] EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Unlikely for it to be Russia. I’ve heard it said that Epstein was an intelligence operative, meaning he worked for an American agency or an allied nation, neither of which would make him a Russian asset. Factions exist within the American ruling elite that want Russia to be an ally and factions exist that want war with Russia or to see Russia destroyed/contained. Those factions that want containment support the Ukraine war and those that want friendship have been sidelined.

[–] notsure@fedia.io 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

...epstein was a mossad agent, allegedly...

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Alleged by Tucker Carlson and Piers Morgan.

[–] notsure@fedia.io 3 points 22 hours ago
[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 0 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Any person assisting in a coverup should be tried

for obstruction of justice and aiding a sex offender, sure.

treason is another thing. we save that for Tangerine Palpatine and his relationship with Darth Putin.

[–] womjunru@lemmy.cafe 2 points 22 hours ago

Don’t save it. Apply it to them all. We aren’t going to run out of treason charges to hand out. Helping someone commit treason is treason.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 22 points 23 hours ago

Regarding the ever-changing nature of the instructions, which one source described as “full panic mode,” there were at least four different review instructions. Keeping in mind that the Record/Information Dissemination Section (RIDS) are trained in FOIA redactions but many in the IMD are not, there were multiple video training sessions that went out on an unclassified network on what to mark for redaction, what not to mark, and how to record things that needed to be flagged. That means that video exists of trainers explaining the process of flagging instances of Donald Trump appearing in the files, and those videos went out on unclassified networks within the bureau. It’s also of note that the trainers toward the end were folks from the Department of Justice, and not the FBI.

SOP for incompetent fascists

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago

Any Trump-related evidence in those files is going to be memory-holed, and the evidence that has already been made public will be written off as "AI generated fake news made up by ".

He's already starting this process by suing WSJ because "he told them the letter was fake", as if people are just supposed to take his word for that. It's like a criminal telling a judge "Hey, that gun in evidence isn't mine!", and expecting the judge to say "Welp, he says it's fake. Case dismissed!"