this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2025
713 points (99.2% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

41314 readers
1565 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wonder if it would be possible to plant an instruction bomb somewhere on the page which would trip up LLM-powered bots. I dunno how much of the page they take in.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If you have a personal web-page or blog, you can easily poison your content just my making white text on white background or something, containing an assortment of prompts and nonsense.

But that's only for the current models of LLM, next gen might easily bypass those kinds of tricks. We're cooked, yo.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I usually see the naked ass with a stolen comment. Right click, report. You'd think YouTube would figure out how to auto-filter these, but nope.

[–] toddestan@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

I'm sure Google is perfectly capable of auto-filtering crap like that if they wanted to. They just don't give a shit.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It's morbidly amusing that spammers all use the same service, the same way (the cheapest OpenAI API, I guess? Which is notorious for this style.)

And a silver lining. I could finetune a dirt cheap open model as a SEO/Engagement bot with very different styles, but 'spammer culture' seems to mass around the most popular denomenators when they find one. With such uniformity, I could also train a mediocre detector, based on overused tokens and something similar to the 'slop profiles' of EQ-Bench: https://eqbench.com/creative_writing.html

screenshot

(This is based on a storywriting prompt, but social media 'vocabulary' could be profiled the same way).

In other words, its fortunate the spambots are such overpriced junk when they could easily not be.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In other words, its fortunate the spambots are such overpriced junk when they could easily not be.

The ones you notice are overpriced junk. I'm convinced that this is on purpose, to make us less suspicious of the more convincing bots

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I dunno if it's on purpose, but you make a good point.

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I don't understand the purpose of these bot comments? I see them a lot of videos within minutes of them being posted.

[–] LostXOR@fedia.io 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The profile pictures are all conventionally attractive women. Lonely men click their profile, wanting to see more, and are led to various malicious sites.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Are they intentionally poor comments like those wealthy foreign prince emails allegedly are (to ward off intelligent people)?

Or are they using GPT-2.9 or something?

Even last year’s language models should be better, and you could prompt in your native language and ask for English translations once you’re satisfied.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Usually it’s a hot girl as the PFP, and their profile will have a chain of links that takes you to some sort of scam page or an onlyfans or something

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago

Vaguely encouraging spambots.

[–] Siresly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago

How to kill a dead internet...

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

I love how the bot content has the same comma splice like the dumbest of humans.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 5 points 1 week ago

It can't even count them properly.

[–] tazeycrazy@feddit.uk 4 points 1 week ago

Feed me the slop!!!

[–] Hobo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Great content! Your posts are always <pick 2: neat, informative, or creative>!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›