For over a hundred years, DeBeers has dominated and controlled the global diamond trade.

But today, Chinese factories are mass-producing lab-grown diamonds, which are chemically identical to natural stones, and prices are collapsing worldwide for both man-made and natural diamonds.

DeBeers sources most of their rough diamonds from mines in Botswana, and the new government there is determined to move DeBeers' value chains to Botswana itself, thereby retaining billions of dollars in industry revenues in-country.

Anglo-American is DeBeers' parent company, and they are trying to divest their holdings. But even after writing off $4.5 billion in book value in two years, no buyers can be found.

top 19 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 49 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Can't wait for the upcoming NYT op-eds: "China is killing the diamond mining monopolies: but at what cost???"

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 46 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Just a quick search gave me some fun ones

BONUS

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Last one sounds like way too extreme satire but knowing those ghouls priorities it's probably real.

[–] appropriateghost@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 month ago

can someone pleaseee think of the oligarchy PLEAAAASE.

DEMOCRACY (copyrighted/trademarked) IS AT STAKE!!

[–] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 17 points 1 month ago

It’s just not the same if a child slave didn’t suffer for it. Or something.

Given all the horrific history of conflict diamonds, etc, why would anyone not want a lab made stone at this point?

[–] GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

I'm prepared for many headlines about how these diamond mines are actually providing good, if meager, livings for people who would otherwise be jobless in Botswana.

It'll be crickets about the massive exploitation, however.

[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago

Good. Fake "rare" gemstones are actually the most common of all gems. Take down the cartel!

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Good, fuck em. Diamonds are shiny carbon rocks with no more intrinsic value, except maybe for industrial use, if they're cheaper than synthetic.

[–] KingGimpicus@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Natural diamonds are quite shit for industrial use. Industry likes uniformity, and natural diamonds have irregularities and flaws that do not benefit them in comparison to synthetic diamonds.

[–] KitKatKitCat@piefed.social 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I think even making a distinction by calling them "synthetic" is doing them a disservice. By all accounts, they're as real as naturally formed diamonds. The quality is higher too. They are better in every way.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah, they are artisinal

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 month ago

[–] lostoncalantha@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

Fantastic news. Hope the diamond trade crashes.

[–] wurzelgummidge@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Eiw, how could I ever hold my head up at the ball in a lab-grown diamond tiara?" squeaked Emily Von Foiegras-Carruthers-Reed.

Diamonds have never been anything more than a scam, but they help the rich feel superior because no one else can afford more than a gravel-sized bit on a thin gold ring.

[–] bountygiver@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The OG NFT

Not only is it also environmentally destructive, it also comes with a side of slavery.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 17 points 1 month ago

Oh no!

[–] jmankman@lemmy.myserv.one 13 points 1 month ago

I'm sure they'll be fine, after all, "diamonds are forerver", right DeBeers?

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Bummer, dude.

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

DeBoers