this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2025
561 points (99.6% liked)

Privacy

3510 readers
374 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be civil and no prejudice
  2. Don't promote big-tech software
  3. No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
  4. No reposting of news that was already posted
  5. No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
  6. No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Spotify is now asking UK users to prove their age to access mature content
  • The age verification checks have been introduced as part of the UK's Online Safety Act
  • Spotify says it will present age checks if it suspects you're under 13, but many users have encountered checks despite being over 18

Spotify has become the latest app to introduce measures designed to comply with the UK's Online Safety Act, by asking users to undergo age verification checks if they want to view or listen to age-restricted content – and many users aren't happy.

The age verification requirements of the Online Safety Act came into effect from July 25, and requires all platforms that display adult content to verify that users are over 18 using age verification checks.

So far, we've seen the likes of Xbox, Discord and Reddit introduce age verification, and now Spotify has done the same.

Latest Videos From TechRadar

Like Reddit and X, Spotify has partnered with digital identification firm Yoti, a service that conducts age checks via facial scanning. For Spotify users, Yoti will use different means of age verification, from facial scanning to requesting a scan of your ID if it suspects you’re under 13 (Spotify’s minimum age requirement).

It will also use algorithmic methods to estimate a user’s age. But Spotify is taking it a step further, stating in its official outline that "your account will be deactivated and eventually deleted" if you fail to complete the age verification process.

While Yoti claims that your data will be kept safe, and eventually deleted, the new requirement has caused uproar among some Spotify users.

Some have take to forums such as Reddit to point that young people are clever enough to find ways around the checks, for example using a VPN to change their location to somewhere other than the UK – and a minority have even threatened to revert to piracy (see below). What is ‘mature content’ in Spotify?

A phone on a green background showing a Peaches album on Spotify (Image credit: Spotify)

This is the burning question among Spotify fans, considering the music streaming app doesn't host X-rated content on the same scale as Reddit or X. However, the platform does have certain features that are aimed at mature users.

In Spotify's case, you may be asked to verify your age if you try to "access some Spotify content and features, like Music videos that are labeled as 18+ by rightsholders". This could also apply to podcasts that discuss mature content and songs with explicit lyrics.

Fortunately, there is a way back if your account becomes deactivated due to an inaccurate age estimation. According to Spotify, you'll get an email that "allows you to reactivate your account within 90 days of deactivation", after which you'll need to go through age verification checks again.

So far, I haven’t been asked to verify my age in the Spotify app when trying to access mature podcasts and music videos, but a handful of users on forums like Reddit who are well over the age of 18 have have already encountered the checks. Why have VPNs become so popular?

Spotify has explained in various community posts that it isn't designed to work with VPNs, and you naturally shouldn't use one to circumvent any age verification checks.

However, this hasn't stopped free VPNs from dominating Apple's UK App Store, as internet users look to find ways of protecting their data from future breaches, or perhaps even bypass those checks completely.

VPNs work by encrypting your internet traffic, but they're not all equal – so it's important to choose the right one for your needs. Free VPNs can log an excessive amount of data, which could ultimately put your privacy at risk, and sometimes lack important security features.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dudesss@lemmy.ca 14 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

If you buy your music, say on Bandcamp Friday where Bandcamp waves their revenue, you could host your own streaming server, and eventually cancel your Spotify membership.

https://isitbandcampfriday.com/

https://www.navidrome.org/

https://github.com/navidrome/navidrome

There is also Qobuz as an alternative which pays the artist $. 01873 per stream, as opposed to Spotify's $0.003 per stream. About 5x more. Plus you can buy the music from the platform if you want. And it has higher quality audio, family plans, gift cards.

https://www.qobuz.com/ca-en/music/streaming/offers

[–] ReluctantZen@feddit.nl 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Qobuz+navi has been my go to for a while. Sadly, a fair amount of music I listen to isn't on Qobuz (or Bandcamp).

[–] dudesss@lemmy.ca 1 points 12 hours ago

Everything is on Qobuz for me. Bandcamp, not so much. But Bandcamp also has music you can't find on streaming services.

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 13 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

People only threaten to leave but never actually do it because "muh recommendation algorithm"

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Whats a good alternative? I tried last.fm for a while but didn't like the suggestions.

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 hours ago

Last.fm has been decent for me.
Also, believe it or not, Youtube. Just looking up the odd song once in a while has resulted in good stuff showing up on my home page pretty regularly.

[–] Mr_WorldlyWiseman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Navidrome and lidarr.

  1. Download all your Spotify playlists and listen history from their privacy page
  2. Download the full discography from all the artists with lidarr
  3. Listen to your new music with dynamic recommendations from your downloaded songs with Navidrome.
[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago

Download the full discography from all the artists with lidarr

Damn, that's gonna be a looot of stuff

[–] roserose56@lemmy.ca 17 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Do it, why don't they do it???? Because they are cowards!
Same goes for Nintendo fans and Nintendo 2, and many other who finally caved.
I'm sick of all these people saying but do nothing

They live from us, not the opposite. We have the power.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 6 points 14 hours ago

I never stopped downloading my favorite stuff. I pay for streaming, but I'm not trusting them to give me access forever.

[–] Texas_Hangover@lemmy.radio 3 points 13 hours ago

This shit is ridiculous.

[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 21 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I want to support independent artists, not that Spotify gives them a fair share. My plan is to support artists where possible via Bandcamp or merch, but otherwise find a way to acquire music

[–] sylvieslayer@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

wait to buy shit at shows instead of online. Bands make more directly from live March sales vs online.

[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 11 points 16 hours ago

Unfortunately, many of the artists I listen to don't play near me often.

[–] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

What? Interacting with people in live environments? In this economy?

small local bands have $20 or even free shows

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 7 points 18 hours ago

Wow look at you affording to go to concerts.

Can we start pushing for it to be illegal to expose children to religion?

[–] biotin7@sopuli.xyz 18 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (3 children)

No no no, just start torrenting. Streaming services shouldn't exist. They rob you & then geo-block you & then censor you

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 8 points 18 hours ago

I want to remind people something: you are using this decentralized and open source platform for free.

Spotify is shit but artists releasing their music there is not helping. There are plenty of musicians struggling to live off their career but these in top charts most people listen to are not poor, their are on spotify because it's lucrative.

[–] lemmyknow@lemmy.today 12 points 22 hours ago (8 children)

I swear if they continue with this kinda shit, I'm gonna go from 'fan' to 'disappointed paying customer'

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

If buying isn't owning piracy isn't stealing.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago

I wonder how "bad" it really is for a kid to be exposed to nudity (and "worse"!), if actually at all or even the reverse.

Then Bam 18 years old, let's look at beheading videos and 2 girls 1 cup no problemo?

[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 116 points 1 day ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (15 children)

In the words of my forefathers, “Fuck you, I won’t do what you tell me.” 🖕

EDIT: MUTHAAAAFUCKAAAARRRRR!!

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] DavidGarcia@feddit.nl 52 points 1 day ago (5 children)

wtf is up with this coordinated push to tie your internet accounts to your government ID.

what garbage international NGO is behind it this time?

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 13 hours ago

Name<=>IP Address<=>Time

Use "save the children" to record and squash political dissent

Next step will be to force VPN's to identify

Then to make ISPs require logging and block non-identified traffic.

We'll be running community wifi pirate networks and off-grid radio text forums in no time.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Billionaires. Want to increase control.

And 'adult' content is code for queer. Anything else is collateral damage.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think it's just queer content they're targeting, though that is a big part of it. These people are also just puritanical fucks that think nobody should get to watch porn. Same people that support anti-sex worker laws, abstinence education, anti-abortion laws. It's about control and stopping anybody from having any goddamn fun.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

True. And we need to show them there are consequences.

They're afraid we're'attacking the family'? Okay, lets go. That shit's evil anyway-children are not property of their parents, especially if those parents are 'stains, lets make this happen.

'Christians are persecuted'? Well, let's figure out what we can do to make that happen, what we can take from them, what we can exclude them from. Bet there are a lot fewer 'chrietians' on college campuses when it gets you blacklisted from any party worth a damn. Fewer christians in slums when the liqour store won't sell to them fewer chriwtians in suburbs when it gets their houses vandalized.

Edit: pushing religion on children is child abuse. Letting children go to a church is child endangerment. Basically begging for the kid to be raped. Deliberate miseducation of your child or neglecting to educate your child is abuse. You do any of that, kid shpuld be taken and you should be sterilized, your property searched for other kids you might be keeping in your basement. Bet we'd find a lot of them.

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 4 points 18 hours ago

They always wanted to do it and they are finally pushing it. Governments spend billions in planning their authoritarian shit, perhaps until now it wasn't convenient for them because not enough people used the internet or they had enough control over it already.

[–] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 17 hours ago

international NGO

Bitch, it's the same dudes as usual. Nothing "non-government" about this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] b_tr3e@feddit.org 40 points 1 day ago (16 children)

Since when have there been age restrictions on music? Freedom of the arts, anyone?

[–] skarn@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, except Spotify isn't just a music company. They've been trying for years to get you to use their App for other stuff that's costs them less royalties.

So now Spotify includes all manners of audiobooks and shitty podcasts.

And while we all agree that age verification is bad... If anything ever deserves age verification, it may be Joe Rogan.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 8 points 21 hours ago

"PARENTAL ADVISORY", once a coveted badge even 😄

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›