A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
Philadelphia’s transit system SEPTA is cutting service by 20% & eliminating 32 bus routes, since state legislators failed to fund the agency
https://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/local/septas-nightmarish-service-cuts-take-effect/4258785/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/transportation/2025/08/23/philadelphia-transit-cuts/
long inhale
PUBLIC SERVICES AREN’T SUPPOSED TO BE PROFITABLE OR EVEN REVENUE NEUTRAL
In this case that's not even the issue. These public services by and large aren't revenue neutral because they increase the functioning of the city. The problem is, the state doesn't believe the city's taxes should improve the city, but it really all belongs to rural communities. The fact that public transit that drives increased out of state spending that directly increased sales tax revenue isn't even considered here because it's purely a rural/urban thing.
What's happening is the rural senators are yelling at Philadelphia about stealing their wallet because Philadelphia reached back while the senators had their hand in Philadelphia's pocket.
Perhaps the rural senators would like to pay their fair share of the infrastructure costs in their low density, low tax revenue housing?
@AceBonobo @roguetrick Yes, while forgoing the income tax revenue from residents of their communities who commute into cities to earn their living. A lot of these "rural" conservative legislators aren't from farm or mountain country, they're from bedroom communities.
You're basically saying, because they are rich they should be taxed less.
@AceBonobo No, the taxes should be paid where they work instead of where they live (or claim to, which the very rich they often game which of their properties they live in to minimize their taxes).
Pittsburgh cut a LOT of lines this year too. And decreased the busses on the routes they kept open
That is the same thing they did in Denver Métro. Underperforming buses gone, now whole swaths of the suburbs have to Uber to the remaining stations. That makes no sense, at all, especially because Denver traffic is starting to bé a 24/7 jam and any motion towards mass transit benefits everyone.
Similar thing is happening in Louisville KY. It's infuriating.
I’ve said it before, but cutting it even further than it already was cut is grim. Getting around through the system was already miserable from delays and infrequent service in a lot of places, especially if you’re used to the convenience of NYC transit (which admittedly also has its own problems). It’s been a few years since I’ve been on it but I can’t imagine it’s gotten any better, and now this.
Is the ultimate plan to ruin it for private companies to buy up on the cheap, I wonder?