this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2025
155 points (98.1% liked)

Ask Lemmy

34271 readers
1393 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tgirlschierke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Maybe not the worst, but this one's personal: Edge of Tomorrow's take on the fantastic All You Need Is Kill (spoilers ahead).

  • Making the movie PG-13. In chapter 2 of the manga, there is a brutal death scene showing how Keiji can't escape the Mimics wherever he goes. The series was quite bloody, and used that to its advantage.
  • Casting Emily Blunt as "Rita Vrataski". One of her defining character traits was that she was unassuming, and that you wouldn't expect that level of combat skill from her appearance.
  • While Keiji was in love with "Rita" in the original, it was unrequited–the change felt actively detrimental to "Rita's" character.

SIDENOTE: I feel like changing this was sort of unimportant, but you'll notice I'm using quotes for "Rita". That's because, in the original, her real name is unknown. She took someone else's identity.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Coolbeanschilly@lemmy.ca 50 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (8 children)

TV adaptation of Wheel of Time was just fucking awful. Like every stupid character change and story change was done literally as stupidly as possible and seemingly with a view to ruin the actual story as it was written.

I genuinely think the showrunners hadn't read the series to the end by most of the changes they made and canned it when they caught up and realised how much they had fucked the story that was still to come.

Book and TV spoilersTower in exile run by Siuan mentoring Egwene who is aes sedai by virtue only of being elected Amyrlin? Nope, Siuan is dead and Egwene was made Aes Sedai so I guess that arc is dead.

Moiraine thought to be dead and later rescued from the tower of Ghenjei by Matt and Thom? Nope, she never got "killed", and never went through the doorway.

Min, Elayne and Aviendha all accepting the situation and bonding with each other as sister wives and sharing the bond with Rand through their own connection? Nope. Min is shacking up with Matt (maybe? Either way doesn't gaf about Rand) and Elayne and Aviendha are shacking up with each other instead.

Having Rand kill Turak with the power instead of entertaining his challenge was a little funny but completely outside of both Rand and LTT's code of honour and especially LTT's massive ego.

The first one that me swear out loud was killing Uno and making him Gaidal Cain. Like.. I guess Uno won't be leading armies in the last battle then, and Birgitte won't be wondering where Gaidal was woven into the world as a young child..

Oh god I forgot they gave Perrin a wife and had him kill her for literally no reason...

So many stupid changes made for no conceivable reason. Not little things to make a character easier to write for TV or more relatable, but sweeping giant story changes that make great chunks of the original canon impossible.

I genuinely implore anyone who even got the slightest amount of joy out of the show to read the books. Learn the original and really very good story, and experience Jordan's writing, rather than Judkins' made-up-as-they-went-along shit erroneously accepted as passable work.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Visstix@lemmy.world 41 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Please don't fuck up project hail mary.. please don't fuck up project hail mary..

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] EponymousBosh@awful.systems 27 points 3 days ago (3 children)

OK, here's the thing. Overall, Peter Jackson's LOTR trilogy is extremely good. I think it's the best Tolkien adaptation we're likely to ever get.

HOWEVER.

The random "Arwen is dying!" subplot was incredibly fucking stupid and while it didn't ruin the movies for me, it did dampen my enjoyment of them. There had to be a better way to get more screentime for Liv Tyler, surely.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 14 points 3 days ago (2 children)

For me it's elves at Helm's Deep. Totally unnecessary.

Although I always laugh out loud when Sam says "We shouldn't even be here" in Osgiliath.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WormFood@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

I love the lotr movies but even the extended editions can't fit in the nuances of all the supporting characters. this gets worse the later you get in the trilogy, the biggest victims probably being the ents, faramir, denethor and pippin.

my own personal pick is probably one flew over the cuckoo's nest, where they change McMurphy's crime from battery and gambling to statutory rape. that did not engender sympathy

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Just pick a scene from The Hobbit movies and there's your answer. Any scene.

[–] oyo@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 days ago

You don't remember in the book when Gandalf did a kick-flip 720 to a backside rail slide down the goblin king's decapitated body?

[–] 5ibelius9insterberg@feddit.org 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Nononono, the singing dwarfes were absolutely true to the book. And Gandalph looking at Galadriel like a Schoolboy with a crush on his friends older Sister was definitely not in the books, but I loved it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 3 days ago (15 children)

The Dark Tower. Good movie in its own right, especially if you like Idris Elba.

First, they took 8 Stephen King books, some of which were like 2" thick, and decided to turn it into a 90-minute PG-13 film. A single film.

Second, because the racist element was so offensive (a Black woman taken out of the 1970s, who has personally experienced racism toward her, is taken to a foreign world, an alternate reality, where she basically is led by an old white man (modeled after Clint Eastwood) and naturally she feels a certain type of way about that) they decided they were going to change it up. Make her white, and him Black. Hence casting Idris Elba as a guy based on Clint Eastwood. Then they dropped her character entirely. I will argue that Elba made a hell of a Gunslinger, but the reason they cast him was because they wanted to turn the whole racism plot on its head. For no good reason. It was fine in the books (this would be The Drawing of the Three, and The Waste Lands, the second and third books).

But for all that, it was an entertaining action flick with a bunch of Stephen King references. I quite like it. As a reader of the books and a fan of Stephen King, I shouldn't, but the movie itself was good.

Honestly that the movie exists at all is the worst change, though.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Not a movie, but a show. "Foundation".

Look, I get it, if you want to tell your own sci fi story that has nothing to do with Asimov, great! Good for you!

But don't pretend it's Foundation.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Eh. I've been watching it, and I think it's a decent adaptation. Entirely faithful to the original? No. But the core trilogy of was written in the 1950s, and it's absolutely a product of its time. I for one am glad they left the misogyny back in the 1950s where it belongs. Also, the original books were very much in the "our friend the atom" era of nuclear power, the era where they were predicting power too cheap to meter and no one had ever heard of a nuclear plant meltdown. The inclusion of the genetic dynasty was an inspired choice. And frankly, I'm glad we're not depicting a far future where everybody is white.

But I think the TV series is faithful to the core themes of the books. It still explores the contrast between the "trends and forces" and "great man" theories of history. It still explores the fascinating concept of predicting the future mathematically. It still shows the slow and inexorable decline of a great galactic empire. And the Mule in the show is every bit a force of malevolent evil as the Mule in the novels.

Overall, is it a perfect one-to-one adaption? No, but that was never going to happen for a book like Foundation. It was long considered unfilmable. But some minor adaptations have allowed them to create a good series that explores the core themes of Asimov's work.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Can I flip the script? Black Hawk Down was the most faithful adaptation of a book I've ever seen. As to the book, the author wanted to tell the story of the Battle of Mogadishu, faithfully. He had unprecedented, at the time, access to Defense Department files, interviewed everyone involved, strived for perfect accuracy.

When those guys are on that street corner, that's what happened.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SimpleMachine@sh.itjust.works 24 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Literally every single detail of the Eragon movie. God I hope someone actually adapts it well some day. Not that it's the world's best prose or anything but I truly believe it would be a great series with the proper director and cast. You know, where literally any of them had read and appreciated the source material.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago

Wanted. It's a completely different story, in the movie it's about a loser guy discovering destiny murders that are ordered to kill people by a Loom. The comic is about a loser guy discovering a secret society of super-villans because he also has a superpower.

But I would also like to present a counter-example. Watchmen, the ending is different from the comic to the movie, and I much prefer the movie ending. In the comic the plan by the villain is to make an alien-like monster appear out of thin air, because this will make humankind unite, in the movie his plan is to blow out the major cities in the world and make it look like Dr. Manhattan did it because then humanity will unite both out of fear and trying to stop Dr. Manhattan from doing it again. I never questioned the comic, but after watching the movie I got the nagging thought of "why would an alien appearing unite mankind? They don't know if the alien destroying stuff was purposeful, them thinking Dr. Manhattan did it is better because they know it was intentional and done by someone who knows who they are"

[–] Aeao@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The color from outer space.

It wasn’t glowing purple. It was closer to a dull grey.

I’ll give them a pass because it’s hard to film lovecraft books. How do you film a new color no one has seen before? Or monster that drives you crazy just to loook at?

[–] kip@piefed.zip 2 points 2 days ago

A purply pinky pallette is often used for cosmic horror. I don't know if this is because of magenta 'not existing' or if it's just a coincidence but it's a good choice anyway

https://leatriceeiseman.com/magenta/

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SacredHeartAttack@lemmy.world 32 points 3 days ago (9 children)

EVERY SINGLE CHOICE made in Ready Player One. What a disappointment.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 32 points 3 days ago (14 children)

Jurassic Park. The original was a horror/thriller that would have had to be unrated if they made it literally from the book. Instead, we got a PG-13 family film that really did not live up to the book.

In fact, it’s the first time that I read the book before seeing the movie, and I learned to never ever do that again.

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 36 points 3 days ago (3 children)

to 4yo me, JP was a horror film. I mean, the kitchen sequence alone. And the run underground in the dark in search of the fuses, only to find a severed arm.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] cobysev@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Personally, I'm still irritated at the end of Hannibal (the 2001 movie). Spoilers for the end of the film and book ahead:

In the book, Clarice Starling has gone as far as she can in her FBI career. She became famous for solving big cases, moved up the corporate ladder, but that glass ceiling kept her from advancing. Too many misogynistic "good ol' boys" at the top, who not only prevent her from excelling in her career, but take every tiny mistake and blow it up into a potentially career-ending scenario.

Enter Hannibal Lecter; the suave and highly intelligent cannibal serial killer. He's outraged that Clarice's coworkers and bosses are actively objectifying her and ruining her career.

Long story short, at the end of the book, Hannibal rescues Clarice and gives her misogynistic boss an impromptu (and tasty!) lobotomy. Clarice ends up running away with Hannibal, because she realized he's the only person who respects her as an intelligent human being and not a piece of ass.

The movie chose to keep her loyal to the FBI and combative against Hannibal, even though the FBI actively tried to destroy her life. Hannibal escapes alone and the film just kind of ends. It was a complete non-ending.

The whole point of Silence of the Lambs and its sequel, Hannibal, was that Clarice was a woman trying to survive in a "man's job," yet proved she could belong - and excel - through her own skill and intellect. Silence of the Lambs did a pretty good job showing that on the big screen, but Hannibal didn't get the point of the story and decided the hero shouldn't end up with a cannibal, period. They treated him as more of an irredeemable monster.

It's kind of the "man vs. bear" meme, except replace the bear with a cannibal serial killer, and the girl still chose the cannibal as the safer choice to her co-workers.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] noahm@lemmy.world 32 points 3 days ago (38 children)

Most of David Lynch's Dune.

load more comments (38 replies)
[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

Dune.

Turning the Bene Gesserit power of Voice into some weird gun was fucking stupid.

Edit to add: first film adaptation from the 80s. The latest movies have been good.

[–] Twig@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Don't actually remember that scene, refresh my memory please?

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›