this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2025
565 points (99.8% liked)

Technology

74663 readers
2696 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] b3an@lemmy.world 45 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Good article! Thanks for the archive link. Amazing that this type of shady shit which Tesla is doing is likewise behind a paywalled source where people can’t get this information as easily.

Inside a Starbucks near the Miami airport, the plaintiffs’ attorneys watched as greentheonly fired up his ThinkPad computer and plugged in a flash drive containing a forensic copy of the Autopilot unit’s contents. Within minutes, he found key data that was marked for deletion — along with confirmation that Tesla had received the collision snapshot within moments of the crash — proving the critical information should have actually been accessible all along.

The attorneys high-fived behind him.

Basically too, Tesla has also tried to delete the data again by powering up the unit from the crash, which would have ‘updated’ the device and conveniently removed data. How STRANGE it maintains this behavior… especially for collision snapshots.

Tesla is actively harming people, lying about it, and using shitty tactics to avoid any responsibility for it. Just like its daddy, Elon.

Seriously. This is so fucked yo. I’m NEVER EVER going to buy Tesla.

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 209 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So they lied. And they'll lie again. And they'll get away with it.

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 38 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Well they have to pay 200+ million. So im not sure if "get away" is the right word. But I get the sentiment. Its a tragedy.

"It took the jury less than a day of deliberation to find Tesla 33 percent liable for the crash and responsible for $243 million in punitive and compensatory damages."

[–] Whitebrow@lemmy.world 49 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Almost 100 billion revenue last year.

250 million of 100 billion is what… 0.25%?

Yeah. That’s nothing to them.

[–] int32@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 2 days ago (1 children)

it never is. fines should be a percentage of the value of the company, not just some sum.

[–] Attacker94@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Value can easily be manipulated, it really should be based on 15% ish of their gross income

[–] 123@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Or value, or XYZ whatever is largest.

[–] Attacker94@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

In theory I agree, in practice I despise laws that are needlessly wordy, and including a whichever is larger clause will add on an unnecessary element since gross income can only be abused with tax credit shenanigans which aren't very over the top, and if I had my way wouldn't exist at all(fairy tale I know)

[–] eierkuchen@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

Well, net income already had plummeted 52% then. Let's see 2025 figures. Sales are down, down, down..

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You'd need to do the math on net profit. Gross revenue is a pretty meaningless figure on its own.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Want to fine Twitter 10% for something horrible they did in 2020 using their net profit? You now owe Twitter 113 million.

[–] despoticruin@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

That's why they said revenue, not profit. You never go for the net. Always go for the gross.

[–] bisby@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Or, y'know, don't do illegal things and it doesn't matter. That's the point of fines being a deterrent

[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 100 points 2 days ago

Tesla? The same company, that was revealed to delete sensitive data out of the crashed vehicles, after it was remotely downloaded, and pretend it was "mysteriously" unavailable?

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 74 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The information was key for a wrongful death case the survivor and the victim’s family were building against Tesla, but the company said it didn’t have the data.

Then a self-described hacker, enlisted by the plaintiffs to decode the contents of a chip they recovered from the vehicle, found it while sipping a Venti-size hot chocolate at a South Florida Starbucks. Tesla later said in court that it had the data on its own servers all along.

Joel Smith, Tesla’s attorney, said in an interview that the company was “clumsy” in its handling of the data but did not engage in any impropriety with regard to it. “It is the most ridiculous perfect storm you’ve ever heard,” Smith said, in an effort to explain why Tesla was unable to produce the collision snapshot data until after the hacker retrieved it for the plaintiffs.

In court, Smith told jurors in his opening statement that Tesla would “never think about hiding” the data because it proved that the driver had time to react to the pedestrians standing by their parked car had he been paying attention.

“We didn’t think we had it, and we found out we did,” he said. “And, thankfully, we did because this is an amazingly helpful piece of information.”

For reference, here is a poem called the Narcissist's Prayer:

That didn't happen.
And if it did, it wasn't that bad.
And if it was, that's not a big deal.
And if it is, that's not my fault.
And if it was, I didn't mean it.
And if I did, you deserved it.

If I was on the jury or I was the judge in a non-jury trial and this happened, I would have pushed for the largest decision possible. No company or person should be allowed to act like this.

[–] rainwall@piefed.social 40 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The jury basically did exactly that. They weren't buying Tesla's multi-year denial that they had the data as an "oopsy doopsy" story.

They found Tesla liable for $235 million. It's the first case Tesla hasent been able to settle, and that's a big ol' number. They are going to have more lawsuits coming.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Tesla’s attorney, said in an interview that the company was “clumsy” in its handling of the data but did not engage in any impropriety with regard to it.

You know what really ticks me off? Every driving Joe and Jane learns that negligence or ignorance or "clumsiness" does not excuse you from breaking the rules.

A very basic tenet of lawfulness. Which does not seem to apply to multi-billion-money-corpos.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

And it’s strange, because corporations are sposto be people now right?

What a fucking joke.

[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago

Clear fraud and an attempt to undermine the American public.

Tesla and SpaceX are some of the largest welfare receivers in the country. But they refuse to take accountability or clean up their messes.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

How does archive get the unpaywalled version? I don't think they pay the subscription for every single tabloid out there?

Asking for a friend.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The paywall is JavaScript but the content is still in plaintext below. The crawlers don’t read the JavaScript.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

Disabling 3rd-party js has no paywall, but only the first paragraph too. Crawlers get full access?

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think they use the same thing that web crawlers use. If Google's crawler couldn't access the content of the page (or could only access a limited amount of content), it would likely rank far lower in search results

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Btw, how come there is no search engine where you can sort and filter how you want instead of how they want? (except self-hosted i mean)

Pornhub has better searchability than, uh, all search sites i know.

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 24 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I'm sure whoever is in charge into the government, who will have no interests in this, is going to definitely look into Tesla. /s

[–] redditexcommunicado@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

Nothing too surprising here