this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2025
861 points (98.8% liked)

Comic Strips

18994 readers
2047 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SugarCatDestroyer@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

It reminds me of real dragons who strive to collect as much gold as possible at any cost.

[–] bunchberry@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] BlueMagma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

You know... Elon musk, Bernard arnaud, Bill Gates... Those dragons !

[–] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

The dragons you name care about power, not gold.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Smaug is only worth like 54 billion, doesn't even make the top tier list.

The ones you ve listed are way wealthier.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 13 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

A properly managed gold horde can be used to invest in infrastructure to increase income. But these assholes will just spend it on useless bullshit and invading their neighbors because nobles lack the education to manage their wealth.

[–] myotheraccount@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

You can only invest, if there is other people who actually make shit, and are willing to give it to you in exchange for gold.

[–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 33 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

This dragon would be a very good museum curator if he wasn't currently dying.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 34 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

He's actually fine, look at how tiny that sword is compared to his chest.

He's pretending to lose because this world is wayyyy behind the curve on starting the industrial revolution and he's trying to trick their primitive oligarchy into realizing fundamental economic truths.

Like, obviously a knight cant kill a dragon if you think about it, right? Metal isn't going to stop fire breath and if something that outweighs you a hundred times over hits you you're not going to survive it.

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 13 points 16 hours ago

Tell that to this fly thats withstood my meaty slaps and keeps coming back for more.

[–] salacious_coaster@infosec.pub 124 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] racketlauncher831@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 day ago

This is gold... wait!

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Existential comics is the best.

[–] tshirtman@mas.to 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Bruh, I robbed it off of another feed - they didn't share source. Thanks for the link though

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just do a reverse image search before posting.

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 0 points 17 hours ago

It's actually a repost

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"What you need are machines to free up labor"

Clankers?

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

I'm currently thinking of the scene in Futurama where Bender (the robot) lies on the couch and mourns "oh if we only had some kind of machine that does the work for us". Very ironic. What if robots gain some basic pride and demand basic rights, including limited work times and such? Who does the work for them?

[–] Shard@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago

Its a funny episode. But its a false dichotomy.

Robots with sapience are granted rights and don't make refrigerators or vacuum cleaners capable of abstract thinking and feelings. I'm looking at you Samsung. Washing machines and microwave ovens do no need to be "smart"

[–] plyth@feddit.org -2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Almost everybody. People will realize, wrongly as some may argue, that the abolition of slavery was a mistake.

Not that I agree, but the need will drive morality, like not going vegan or keeping up Neocolonialism.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Tbh, if AI was freeing up labour and people would still get the same pay without having to work, nobody would complain. The issue is that people who's work got "freed up" don't get paid.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 6 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

that's the same thing the textile loom did.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

the difference is that when the textile loom was invented, industrial revolution just started and cities weren't built yet. Today, they are, and since growth generates the majority of human labor, you're facing a huge unemployment crisis in the next decades.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

...what? the city of Rome had a million inhabitants around 0AD

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

yeah and then it fell and then the medieval ages started where you only had buildings made of stone if they were either fortresses for the rulers or monasteries/churches. and then the great fire of london happened in 1666 and people realized it's a stupid idea to build cities of wood and rebuilt everything in stone. that's what i was referencing when i said that "cities weren't built yet" at the very start of the modern age.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 12 hours ago

rome was one of many million-inhabitant cities at the time. baghdad, beijing and chang'e, for example.

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think the dragon is a billionaire and is tricking the knight into destroying jobs

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago

Chad luddite

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago

Well most get hired back with the same amount of work at lower pay.

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Fuck the G-ride i want the machines that are makin em"

[–] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Literally me. The only wealth I put stock in is family, friends, food, tools, reference materials and books.

No, I didn't list books twice. There's a lot of shows I keep copies of, also posters, weights, standard measures and such.

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Do you own a Kilo? I've always wanted a noble metal kilo.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A tungsten kilo is the only kilo worth having.

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 1 points 7 hours ago

Þe tiniest kilo.

Is tungsten reactive? I ΓΎought ΓΎey used noble metals because ΓΎey were stable.

[–] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

35lbs is the single heaviest weight I have at the moment, and honestly, that's for workouts, not precise measurement. In all honesty, I mostly brought up weights and measures to explain what I meant by "reference materials" as a seperate category that happens to include some books, and is far from confined to them.

All that said, the single most extreme or "esoteric" such thing I own is a 24x36x6inch granite surface-plate I got free when some jackass abandoned it in his girl-friend's garage. No idea the quality or weight of it.

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 1 points 7 hours ago

Aww. I figured ΓΎat's what you meant, but it was possible you collected precise weights and measures.