this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2025
1244 points (99.0% liked)

Flippanarchy

1552 readers
363 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 4 points 18 hours ago

If something happens to one of them and I happen to be in the area ... I didn't see anything.

[–] Cocopanda@lemmy.world 10 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

As someone from an ultra wealthy family but with no real wealth of my own. I’ve warned them plenty. They think they are safe. I’m just gonna sit over here and sip my tea. They can have fun.

[–] AgentOrangesicle@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

Just drink matcha for safety.

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 2 points 18 hours ago

Hey look those people off the same class have opposite view points go waste time and effort in them. Ez win every time

[–] badelf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 day ago

I hope you realize Orange is amassing domestic military to protect billionaires and himself.

[–] vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sorry, I could afford to buy a "t".

[–] SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago
[–] sqgl@sh.itjust.works 110 points 2 days ago (4 children)

11 years ago...

The Pitchforks Are Coming… For Us Plutocrats — By NICK HANAUER

See also his Wikipedia page in the section on his controversial TED talk where he said:

Businesses and the rich do not create jobs. Jobs are created by a feedback loop between customers and businesses that is set in motion by consumers increasing their demand....

If lower income tax rates for the wealthy really worked we would be drowning in jobs, and yet unemployment and underemployment is at record highs

TED refused to publish the talk.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

This is the only TED talk worth watching.

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago

Incorrect. The best TED talk was the one where Bobby Mcferrin educated neuroscientists in music theory.

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 46 points 2 days ago (5 children)

They refused to publish it? Wow, thank you for finally giving me a concrete reason to hate TED talks. They've always seemed like the biggest fart-sniffing conventions I can imagine. And it drives me nuts how people all present with a certain cadence, intonation, tone of voice. Like some kind of learned artificial dialect, the "good public speaker" dialect/accent. A perfectly fitting marker of the incestuous masturbation so prevalent among the kinds of people who give TED talks. I'm not saying they're all bad, so no offense to anyone's favorite TED speaker. There's been decent ones, but its largely exactly the kind of elite Ivy League parasite that, remarkably, manages to be despicable to both conservatives and many liberals. No wonder TED didn't publish something that might make their own speakers feel bad.

[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago

TED is a platform for basic "Ecomodernism" (Green Capitalism), its entire philosophy is Business As Usual with slow change via technological innovations.

[–] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They're all Steve Jobs wannabes. They copy his presentation style as much as possible, short of wearing a black turtleneck and jeans.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 44 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (22 children)

Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's capitalism. I find the more of a capitalist someone is, the more they worship money and the more they idolize anyone with a lot of it.

It also seems to be the case that the further you are from capitalism and it's ideals as a person, the more you're willing to emphasize with those less fortunate and want to help them to succeed.

Weird huh?

[–] dickalan@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

It’s totally not weird at all that there hasn’t been any studies on billionaires brains and what having that much money does to you

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Capitalism doesn’t hold a monopoly on financial obesity, it can manifest in many economic models.

[–] rarelyhere@europe.pub 3 points 1 day ago

Agreed. People blame capitalism but our problem isn't economic: it's social, psychological, cultural.

That financial obesity is a symptom, but the root is the issue of cooperating with immense amounts of total strangers: no animal is wired for it, almost no one is wired to truly, deeply, emotionally care for nameless and faceless people: strangers who, you feel, won't help you when you have a fever, but who raise the price of potatoes because they need them too. We say we do care, maybe we even donate 5€ to some cause, but a stranger is a stranger and our day goes on.

That antagonism is even more heartfelt if you were a child who wasn't give the love they should have been given... Like way too many of us. Burning the village to feel its warmth.

No animal before us had the option, once they had abused the trust of their pack, to easily move hundreds of miles away and start from scratch with a clean reputation.

No animal before us fell into the trap of the paradox of tolerance: if a pack member intentionally and repeatedly damages other members, other animals do not spend a lot of time writing books about feel-good, entirely theorethical principles.

No animal is as detached from themselves as we are: since we have such complicated language with abstract concepts, we can forget the truth of our bodies and live in a fantasy world. We can even deceive ourselves, and make decisions informed by that deception. Even worse, we can deceive others a lot better than other animals: a lying gazelle might maybe sound the "lion!" alarm when there is no lion, but it's soon discovered; humans instead can brainwash others into standing against their own best interests, and the victim might believe it was their own opinion until their very last breath.

Capitalism creates competition with its advanatages and disadvantages, but I'm not sure it has great alternatives within the current system: incentives are necessary in a society of strangers, although I think the details -such as the amounts and the safeties- should be re-thought.

Again, within the current system. But I believe we will witness big changes in our lifetime (climate, biodiversity, AI, mass surveillance, military drones, a multipolar world, life extension, pandemics...), and who knows, maybe the entire framework might change.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[–] xxce2AAb 79 points 2 days ago (10 children)

Yeah, but if these people were truly masters of long-term thinking, they wouldn't be spending all their time ruining the economies upon which their wealth is predicated.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 69 points 2 days ago (14 children)

You say that, but if you have a large cache of cash, economic crashes are just opportunities to buy assets at a bargain.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] dangling_cat@piefed.blahaj.zone 53 points 2 days ago (7 children)

I think we have passed the point of no return. Like, we are going to have our very first trillionaire, and everyone seems okay with it.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Nothing's going to happen to them. They have the upper hand and everything that happens will be slightly tilted in their favor, at least. I don't see any major victories ahead for us. This isn't a defeatist attitude, it's the recognition of truth that makes revolutionaries do what they do.

I'm just saying, if things go as usual the billionaires will be just fine, it's the rest of us that need help

[–] hector@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

On the contrary the political monster they created appears assured to seize absolute power and when the financial downturns hit the supreme leader will cannibalize the rich, first the disfavored rich that will be prosecuted and have their assets seized, before long seizing assets will be the end.

Even those that stay above the fray will see their real wealth decline as the economy fails even as the numbers on the economy are rigged to make it appear as good as ever.

Short-term greed will destroy these Ultra rich. One way or the other and or others.

[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

That seems totally plausible

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago (11 children)

"Oh, those rich people better look out. Something real bad is going to happen to them" is a thing I've been hearing since the 90s.

The only "bad thing" I can think that's remotely qualifying is that US billionaires are being left behind by their East Asian peers, as their home country is run into the ground. And idk if "feel bad because you're not in first place anymore" is the thing being implied.

[–] bier@feddit.nl 4 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Yeah even after Luigi shooting a CEO nothing happened. Even if a revolution happened these people would just go to their luxury underground bunkers to wait it out.

[–] wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There have been several more CEOs shot and stabbed since then but the media was instructed to not push those stories.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

Please enumerate.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I mean, looking a bunch of billionaires in a luxury basement for the rest of their lives would be something resembling a consequence. I would actually be fine with that.

Would I prefer they get the Jack Ma or Hui Ka Yan treatment? Absolutely. The Louis XVI treatment? For a few of them, definitely.

But it's so far away from "Renting out Venice to celebrate my marriage to my favorite concubine" that I'd take it

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›