this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2025
122 points (96.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

13450 readers
532 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
toaster@slrpnk.net
grue@lemmy.world
Toaster1@lemmy.world
122
Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior (www.pnas.org)
submitted 2 weeks ago by veganpizza69@lemmy.vg to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Seven studies using experimental and naturalistic methods reveal that upper-class individuals behave more unethically than lower-class individuals. In studies 1 and 2, upper-class individuals were more likely to break the law while driving, relative to lower-class individuals. In follow-up laboratory studies, upper-class individuals were more likely to exhibit unethical decision-making tendencies (study 3), take valued goods from others (study 4), lie in a negotiation (study 5), cheat to increase their chances of winning a prize (study 6), and endorse unethical behavior at work (study 7) than were lower-class individuals. Mediator and moderator data demonstrated that upper-class individuals’ unethical tendencies are accounted for, in part, by their more favorable attitudes toward greed.

Fig.1 Percentage of cars that cut off (i) other vehicles at the four-way intersection (from study 1) (A) or (ii) the pedestrian at the crosswalk (from study 2) (B), as a function of vehicle status (1 = lowest status, 5 = highest status).

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hegar@fedia.io 29 points 2 weeks ago

EEG studies have shown that power changes the brain, suppressing empathy and making you less capable of considering the pain of others.

The statement that "power corrupts" is will always be true, it's literally how our brains work. The powerful will always be more evil than the rest of us.

Here are some sources:

"Recent evidence has demonstrated that empathic responses are modulated by social power." "high-power people show low empathic accuracy compared to low-power people" "numerous studies have shown that people with high power are less accurate in recognizing others’ emotional expressions"

"higher socioeconomic status is associated with reduced neural responses to the pain of others" "experiments using fMRI indicates that power promotes greed ... displayed decreased response in the right and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, indicating a weaker restrain of self-interest when processing receiving more than others" "Power decreases empathic concern" "powerholders may experience less distress and less compassion as well as exhibit greater autonomic emotion regulation when faced with the pain of others" "elevated power impedes accurate understanding of other people’s emotional expressions" "Elevated power is associated with heightened interest in rewards while low power is associated with increased attention to the interest of others"

"In face-to-face conversations, participants disclosed experiences that had caused them suffering. As predicted, participants with a higher sense of power experienced less distress and less compassion and exhibited greater autonomic emotion regulation when confronted with another participant's suffering."

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

See BMW owners.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

mercedes even worst, an mercedes owner pulled an insurance fraud upon a family member.(basically he saw a opportunity and saw scratches on familys car and decided his was also scratched by the car, so he accused of bumping scratching the car, eventhough both cars were parked and not moving.

[–] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 weeks ago

On the one hand, greed is already an indication of unethical behavior. But on the other hand, wealthy people are not concerned about paying a few hundred dollars (lunch money), for a ticket. The behavior could be slightly mitigated by making fines proportional to net worth, otherwise they’re laws that only apply to the poor.

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

higher wealth and social status has less consequences

[–] AceBonobo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Imagine raising a child but never making them face consequences for their actions.

[–] Cocopanda@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Idk. My uncle is ultra wealthy and he was an honest tax payer. Sure he donated a lot to offset his taxes. But he never committed fraud.