this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2025
219 points (95.8% liked)

General Discussion

13653 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy.World General!

This is a community for general discussion where you can get your bearings in the fediverse. Discuss topics & ask questions that don't seem to fit in any other community, or don't have an active community yet.


🪆 About Lemmy World


🧭 Finding CommunitiesFeel free to ask here or over in: !lemmy411@lemmy.ca!

Also keep an eye on:

For more involved tools to find communities to join: check out Lemmyverse!


💬 Additional Discussion Focused Communities:


Rules and Policies

Remember, Lemmy World rules also apply here.0. See: Rules for Users.

  1. No bigotry: including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with ‘silly’ questions. The world won’t be made better by dismissive comments to others on Lemmy.
  4. Link posts should include some context/opinion in the body text when the title is unaltered, or be titled to encourage discussion.
  5. Posts concerning other instances' activity/decisions are better suited to !fediverse@lemmy.world or !lemmydrama@lemmy.world communities.
  6. No Ads/Spamming.
  7. No NSFW content.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

We’re not in the business of making financial recommendations, but CNBC personality Jim Cramer says there’s no bubble coming for the AI sector — which, given his track record, should probably make any AI investors just a bit nervous.

Now that Cramer — whose calls have historically underperformed so much that he inspired an entire phenomenon of people betting against him, called the “Inverse Cramer” effect — has chimed in on the topic, netizens are worried about an imminent collapse.

“Oh god, it’s worse than we thought,” one Reddit user wrote in a tongue-in-cheek post. “The grim reaper of finance has weighed in, the collapse of the global financial system is imminent.”

Cramer has made plenty of disastrous calls over decades. In February 2000, he proclaimed that internet-related companies “are the only ones worth owning right now” — right before the dot-com collapse. In 2012, he bet against stalwarts like HP, Netflix, both of which soared following his sell notice. Hes even been accused of playing a part in the 2008 financial crisis.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 51 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Jim Cramer, who famously told people to hold Bear Stearns as the 2008 crash was unfolding, is making another bold prediction on LLM's and GenAI. If you're heavily invested in LLM's and GenAI, this is just another thing to think about as financial shenanigans continue to unfold.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don’t think Cramer has the requisite skills to understand this.

Weirdly, Wall Street quants do have the requisite skills to understand the tech in detail.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

Agreed. Dude is just an entertainer.

[–] cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de 29 points 2 weeks ago

Oof, the bubble-pop is closer than I expected.

The grim reaper of finance has weighed in

Thats a good one

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"Fanny Mae and Freddy Mac are fine"

  • Kramer, early 2008, iirc.
[–] beetus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

You should check their last 1 year charts btw. Trump wants to do some shit with them and they've 10x since November election.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ah yes, the ever old reliable RCI.

Reverse Cramer Index.

[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

How is the RCI doing these days?

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 4 points 2 weeks ago

Man I'll be honest, I haven't looked at it in a while.

If I had to guess, the exact opposite of what he says.

[–] wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It's not going to be a pop. It'll be a fizzle. This one isn't a debt fueled collapse - everything has been paid for up front with cash. The companies who are paying for the enormously expensive datacenters just won't ever bring in non-investor money. Yes that can result in some sudden bankruptcies and subsequent devaluations - but nothing that will make a company's market cap shoot to zero.

If anything be happy that the billionaires who are personally funding all of this ai shit will lose their investments.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I could see a decade of stagnation because of this.

But I also think in a few quarters someone will start asking questions when these new data centres start coming online

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

I think you mean another decade of stagnation.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 3 points 2 weeks ago

Finally, wealth redistribution

[–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Your investment portfolio should be diversified over multiple sectors and regions anyway otherwise it's gambling.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

100%, especially diversifying beyond the US

[–] jaykrown@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Hilarious that this guy is wealthy even though he's been wrong so many times. It just goes to show that being loud and confident is what matters most.

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This reads like an article that you copy-pasted. You should include the source if so.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Right you are.

My mistake. Added the link.

[–] JailElonMusk@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 weeks ago

Just invest in a goddamn index fund and fire this goon.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 3 points 2 weeks ago

Any "AI free" ETFs? Like SPYX is with oil? I think it's SPYX.